The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mc 980a

Manufactured by Tanita
Sourced in Japan

The MC-980A is a body composition monitor that measures various body metrics, including body weight, body fat percentage, muscle mass, and more. It provides detailed information about the user's body composition through advanced bioelectrical impedance analysis technology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using mc 980a

1

Anthropometric and Body Composition Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height (cm) and weight (kg) were measured using a stature meter (YHS-200D, YAGAMI Inc., Nagoya, Japan) and an anthropometer (MC-980A, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Weight measurements were taken with light clothing and with shoes off. Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) was calculated from height and weight measurements. Body fat percentage was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (MC-980A, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). The lean body mass (LBM) (kg) was calculated from the weight and body fat percentage. Visceral fat area (VFA) (cm2) was measured at the umbilicus level, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (SIGNA Premier, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA), as described in a previous report [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Body Composition Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height (cm) and body weight (kg) were measured using a stadiometer (YHS‐200D, YAGAMI Inc., Nagoya, Japan) and an anthropometer (MC‐980A, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Body weight was measured with light clothing and without shoes. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated from height and body weight measurements. Body fat (%) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (MC‐980A, Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). Fat‐free mass (kg) was calculated from the body weight and fat. Visceral fat area (cm2) and subcutaneous fat area (cm2) were measured using MRI (Signa Premier; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA), as described previously (Usui et al., 2020 (link)). Body composition at each body part was measured using DXA, as described in a previous study (Kawakami et al., 2021 (link)). Abdominal circumference (cm) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the umbilical region with an inelastic measuring tape at the end of normal expiration. Calf circumference (cm) was measured in 0.1 cm increments in the standing position; twice on each side where the circumference was the greatest. Details of the two circumferential measurements can be found in previous studies (Kawakami et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Estimation of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthropometric measurements were performed in the morning by trained researchers after the participants had fasted for a minimum of 12 h. Height and body composition were measured with the participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was estimated using a multifrequency BIA (MC-980A, Tanita Corp.), as described previously(14 (link)). To adjust for the effects of an individual’s physique, we divided the ASM (kg) by the square of height (m). Our previous study confirmed a strong correlation between ASM/height2 measured with the same BIA and ASM/height2 measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Horizon A, Hologic Inc.) (r = 0·88 for men, r = 0·84 for women)(14 (link)). The inter-instrument reliability between the two measurement methods for ASM was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0·88 for men and 0·76 for women)(15 (link)). We defined low muscle mass based on the cut-offs for BIA-measured muscle mass values, as recommended by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019(20 (link)); the ASM/height2 cut-offs were 7·0 and 5·7 kg/m2 for men and women, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The participants visited the laboratory between 08.30 and 10.30 hours, and all measurements were conducted by trained investigators. Height was measured using a stadiometer (YHS-200D, YAGAMI Inc.). Body weight was measured using an electronic scale (MC-980A, Tanita Corp.), with the participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by the square of the body height (m). Waist circumference was measured at the umbilical region with an inelastic measuring tape at the end of normal expiration to the nearest 0·1 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multifrequency BIA for Body Composition Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition parameters were examined by using a multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer (MC-980A; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). The BIA instrument used six electrical frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and 1000 kHz). The surface of the hand electrode was placed in contact with each of the 5 fingers, while the heels and forefoot of the participant were placed on the circular-shaped foot electrode. The participants held out their arms and legs to avoid contact with any other body segments during the measurements. The BIA assessment was performed between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM. The participants were required to fast and avoid vigorous exercise for at least 1 hour before BIA assessment. The measurements were recorded by well-trained staff and completed within 30 seconds.
Height and weight were measured barefoot, with participants wearing underwear and a cloth gown, to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively, using a mechanical balance with altimeter (Seca 711, Seca GmBH & Co Kg, Germany). BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the square of body height (m2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMI (kg/m2) was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Fat and muscle mass were determined using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (MC-980A, TANITA, Tokyo, Japan). We measured the waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) to confirm whether the participants displayed the corresponding risk factors for metabolic syndrome. Risk factors for metabolic syndrome were evaluated according to the Japanese standards as follows: abdominal obesity (WC: male ≥ 85 cm, female ≥ 90 cm), high blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg, or a history of hypertension), high fasting glucose (≥110 mg/dL or a history of diabetes), low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL), and hypertriglyceridemia (≥150 mg/dL or a history of hyperlipidemia) [15 (link)]. To measure the amount of daily physical activity (PA) and sleep time, participants were required to wear a Polar A370 fitness tracker based on a wrist-worn three-axis accelerometer model for the entire study period of 7 days [16 (link)]. The number of walking steps, total sleep time, and PA time by intensity (light, moderate, vigorous) were divided into baseline and during the experiment, and the mean values of each were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured using a stadiometer (YHS-200D, YAGAMI Inc., Nagoya, Japan). Body weight was measured using an electronic scale (MC-980A, Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Body weight was measured with the participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the body weight (kg) divided by the square of the body height (m).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Body Composition Measurement Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were obtained in the morning, after fasting for at least 12 hours, by trained researchers. Height and body composition were measured with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. BMI was calculated by dividing the weight (in kilograms) by the height squared (in meters). Body weight, fat, and ASM were measured using a multifrequency BIA analyzer (MC-980A, Tanita Corp, Tokyo, Japan) with 6 electric frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and The DXA [Delphi A (until December 2016) or Horizon A (after January 2017); Hologic Inc] was used to measure body fat and lean soft tissue mass. The interinstrument reliability for ASM between the 2 DXA devices was excellent (ICC = 0.97). Participants lay in the supine position on a DXA table for whole-body scanning according to the manufacturer's protocol. ASM was estimated by summing the lean soft tissue mass of the arms and legs. BIA-and DXA-measured FFMs were calculated as the whole-body weight minus whole-body fat mass. To adjust for individual physique, ASM (kg) or whole-body FFM (kg) was divided by the height squared (m 2 ). Supplementary Figure 1 shows an explanation drawing of the body compartments, including FFM and ASM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Muscle Mass Assessment via BIA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-body and segmental muscle mass was measured using BIA with a multi-frequency body composition analyzer (MC-780A and MC-980A, Tanita Co., Tokyo, Japan). Subjects were required to stand on the balance scale with bare feet and hold the handles during measurements, which provided whole-body and segmental muscle mass. Muscle mass obtained using BIA has been reported as reliable with a high correlation to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry25 (link). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was calculated as the sum of the skeletal muscle masses of the arms and legs. Trunk muscle mass was calculated by subtracting the appendicular skeletal muscle mass from the whole-body muscle mass. BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight by the square of the height at the time of the measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multifrequency Bioimpedance Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition and anthropometric measurements will include body weight, and fat and muscle volumes will be measured using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MC-980A; TANITA Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Height will also be measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!