The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

70 protocols using application suite x las x

1

Multimodal Imaging Techniques for Comprehensive Sample Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gross images were taken with a Sony Macro Lens and camera. Figure 1A was created with BioRender.com. IHC images were captured using Leica STELLARIS 5 confocal system (using the 10x objective) with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) at the CHP Rangos imaging core facility. Brightfield imaging was obtained using the Thermo Fisher EVOS M7000 system (using the 10x and 20x objectives) with EVOS M7000 Software revision 2.0.2094.0. Whole H&E slides were scanned using the Leica Aperio AT2 system (using the 40x objective) and subsequently evaluated using Aperio ImageScope 12.4.3. Images were optimized using Adobe Photoshop (version 23.3.1). Figures were compiled using Adobe Illustrator (version 26.2.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macro-Morphological Characterization of Fungal Specimen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macro-morphological characteristics were described, based on dried material and the photographs provided here. Colour codes (e.g. 8E8) are from Kornerup and Wanscher (1978) . Pileus was sectioned with a razor blade and mounted in 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. Pileipellis, hyphal systems of pileus, basidia and basidiospores were observed and captured using a compound microscope (Leica DM2500) equipped with a camera. Images were measured with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X). In the description section, the number, length, width and length/width ratio of the measured basidiospores are denoted with symbols n, L, W and Q, respectively. The Faces of Fungi number was registered by following Jayasiri et al. (2015) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence Imaging of 2-Me PeER in HepaRG Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated HepaRG cells were cultured in collagen-coated eight-well chambers (SCC-038, Matsunami Glass Ind., Ltd., Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (160,000 cells per well). After culturing differentiated HepaRG cells for 6 days, fluorescence imaging was performed with 2-Me PeER (1 μM) and Hoechst (1 μM). After the fluorescence imaging, cells were washed with PBS three times, then culture medium was added, and the cells were incubated for 1 day. The next day, the culture medium was removed, cells were washed once with PBS (pH 7.4), and 200 μM DMEM was added. Fluorescence imaging was performed to confirm that 2-Me PeER had been removed from the cells. After that, 2-Me PeER (1 μM) and Hoechst (1 μM) dissolved in DMEM were added, the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and fluorescence imaging was performed again. Fluorescence images were captured using a Leica Application Suite X (LAS-X) with a TCS SP8 and a 40× objective lens. Light sources were a diode laser (405 nm) and an Ar laser (514 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then processed by the Histopathology Core Facility in the University of Sydney. H&E staining, Picro-Sirius red staining and immunohistochemistry were completed as described previously [22 (link),28 (link)]. Images were captured with a Leica DM6000B microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) and analysed with automation provided by Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) version 3.5.5.19976. Stain area thresholding was varied according to the isotype negative control immunostain. The immunostained area of CD8 or CD4 was measured using a threshold value and divided by total tissue area to calculate the proportion of positive staining on each section [22 (link),30 (link),31 (link)]. Histological quantification of lesions was performed as described [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Confocal Imaging of Midgut Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed samples were imaged on a Leica SP8 WLL confocal microscope with a 63× HC PL APO CS2 oil objective. Serial optical sections were taken at 0.5 μm intervals through the entirety of whole-mounted, immunostained midguts. Confocal microscopy images were collected using Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) (Version 3.5.7.23225). Fiji (Version 2.9.0) and Bitplane Imaris x64 (Version 9.7.2) were used for image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence Microscopy of Membrane-Bound Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were mounted on a 2% agarose pad containing resuspension medium using a gene frame (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Cells were concentrated by centrifugation (3,300 g for 30 seconds) prior to mounting and visualization. This step had no impact on the localization of the fusion proteins. Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Leica (Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) DMi8 wide-field inverted microscope equipped with an HC PL APO 100×DIC objective (NA = 1.40) and an iXon Ultra 888 EMCCD Camera from Andor Technology (Belfast, Northern Ireland). Membranes were stained with TMA-DPH at a final concentration of 100 μM. Excitation light intensity was set to 50%, and exposure times were 300 ms for TMA-DPH (λex = 395/25 nm; λem = 460/50 nm); 500 ms for m(E)GFP (λex = 470/40; λem = 500 to 550); and 1 second for mYFP (λex = 510/25; λem>530) respectively. Images were acquired with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X), and analysis and processing were performed using the ImageJ software [97 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunocytochemistry of Actin Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells seeded on coverslips for more than 24 h were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, then permeabilizated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min. After that, cells were treated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with species-specific secondary antibody for two hours at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted using an antifade mounting solution containing 4,6-diamidino- 2-phenylindole (DAPI; P36935, Invitrogen) after three-time washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Actin was stained with Myo10 (Rabbit, HPA024223, Sigma-Aldrich) and Rhodamine Phalloidin (R415, Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Confocal images were captured using ZEISS LSM 880 confocal microscope with Airyscan (Carl Zeiss, Germany) or Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Switzerland), and fluorescence quantification was measured as described previously 9 (link). Co-localization analysis was performed via Leica Application Suite X (LAS X).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Imaging Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three representative areas were imaged using a bright field microscope (Leica DMi8) with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X). For nuclear staining (Ki67 and phospho-STAT3), images were converted to 8-bit images and threshold adjusted. Then positive nuclear staining was counted and analyzed with “analyze particles, Size (pixel^2: 10-Infinity)”. MECA-32 stained vessels and lung nodules from tail vein injection were manually counted. Overlapping regions (MAFF, HIF-1, BACH1, IL11, pimonidazole) were calculated after drawing the region of interest and compare the percentage of positively stained areas, which were coexisted in both tissue sections. For spontaneously metastasized lung nodules, whole tissue sections were imaged using NanoZoomer 2.0-RS (Hamamatsu). Then using ImageJ, images were converted to 8-bit images and contrast was enhanced to saturated pixels of 0.35%. After threshold was adjusted, images were mask converted to generate to black and white images. From converted images, lung nodules were counted using “analyze particles, Size (pixel^2: 5-infinitiy)”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence images were acquired
using a Leica DM6B fluorescence microscope with a DFC7000T camera
(40fps at full resolution, pixel size: 4.54 μm). 10× (numerical
aperture (NA): 0.4) dry, 40× (NA: 0.85), and 63× (NA: 1.32)
oil-immersion objectives were used for imaging. The following filters
were used: blue filter (DAP) excitation 350/50 nm, dichroic 400, emission
460/50; green filter (L5) excitation 480/40, dichroic 505, emission
527/30; red filter (RHO) excitation 546/10 nm, dichroic 560, emission
585/40; Cy5.5 filter (Y5) excitation 620/60, dichroic 660, emission
700/75. All images were further processed using the Leica Application
Suite X (LAS X).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Imaging Protocol for Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gross images were taken with a Sony Macro Lens and camera. Figure 1a was created with https://www.biorender.com/. IHC images were captured using Leica STELLARIS 5 confocal system (using the 10 × objective) with Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) at the CHP Rangos imaging core facility. Brightfield imaging was obtained using the Thermo Fisher EVOS M7000 system (using the 10 × and 20 × objectives) with EVOS M7000 Software revision 2.0.2094.0. Whole H&E slides were scanned using the Leica Aperio AT2 system (using the 40 × objective) and subsequently evaluated using Aperio ImageScope 12.4.3. Images were optimized using Adobe Photoshop (version 23.3.1). Figures were compiled using Adobe Illustrator (version 26.2.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!