The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

434 protocols using spad 502

1

Photosynthetic Profiling of Cotton Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the full boll-setting stage under sunny and cloudless weather from 9:00 to 10:00 AM, the photosynthetic parameters of fully expanded leaves (fourth main-stem leaf from the apex) were determined using three randomly selected plants in the central two rows of each plot. SPAD-502 readings were used as a proxy of the chlorophyll content of leaves (SPAD-502, Minolta, Japan). A Li-6400 portable photosynthetic apparatus (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, United States) was also used to measure the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr). The fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll, including the primary light energy conversion efficiency (Fv/Fm), non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII), were measured by an FMS2 portable fluorescence system (Hansatech instruments, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, United Kingdom). The Fv/Fm determination required leaves to be dark-adapted for half an hour (Song et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Crop Growth and Yield

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cotton growth and development measurements were performed on plants in the central part of the experimental plot to avoid border effects. Leaf chlorophyll contents (SPAD values) were measured at 90 days after sowing (DAS) on the 4th fully developed leaf using a SPAD-502 (Konica-Minolta, Japan). Plant height, codes per plant, bolls per plant and height to node ratio were counted and calculated. Leaf area was measured following the procedure described by Monteiro et al.34 (link) using a leaf area meter CI-202 (CID Bio-Science, Inc., USA) in the laboratory. Leaf area index (LAI) was calculated using the formula: LAI = (leaf area per plant x number of plants) / plant area (2 m2). Seed cotton was harvested twice (during October-2018 and November-2018.
For wheat, the chlorophyll content (SPAD value) and LAI were measured at 90 DAS. Chlorophyll content was recorded with three repeated readings per flag leaf using a SPAD-502 device (Konica-Minolta, Japan). Leaf area was measured following the procedure of Yin et al.35 and using a leaf area meter (CI-202, CID Bio-Science, Inc., USA). The data of yield and yield contributing parameters plant height, spike length, grains per spike, spikelets per spike, plant biomass, and grain yield were recorded was recorded at maturity and following standard procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Agronomic Traits Evaluation of Chinese Cabbage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The agronomic traits were determined for the investigation according to Liu et al. [66 (link)], and the main agronomic indicators include: maximum outer leaf soluble solids (MOSS), middle leaf soluble solids (MLSS), number of outer leaves (NOL), plant height (PH), maximum outer leaf width (MOLW), maximum outer leaf length (MOLL), maximum outer leaf area (MOLA), maximum outer leaf SPAD value (MSV), leaf head gross weight (LHGW), leaf head net weight (LHNW), root weight (RW), midrib length (ML), midrib width (MW), midrib thickness (MT), condensed stem length (CSL), leaf head height (LHH), leaf head width (LHW), and head length/head width ratio (HR). At the same time, referring to the method of Badu-Apraku et al. [67 (link)], ward minimum variance cluster analysis was performed on agronomic trait indicators. The soluble solid content was determined using a PAL-1 digital sugar meter (ATAGO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The chlorophyll content of Chinese cabbage was determined using a portable hand-held chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 (Konica-Minolta, Japan, SPAD-502). The Chinese cabbage leaf area was measured using a portable leaf area meter (Yaxin-1242, Beijing, China). All assays were conducted with at least three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Plant Growth Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant length was calculated by using a measuring tape from the soil surface to the tip of the longest spike. Flag leaf area was determined by the Muller (1991) (link) formula, which is given as: flag leaf area = maximum length × maximum breadth × 0.74. Total chlorophyll content (SPAD) was estimated by using a portable chlorophyll meter SPAD 502 (Minolta, chlorophyll meter, SPAD-502, Japan) as proposed by Del Pozo et al. (2016) (link). The middle part of the third mature leaf of each plant was used to measure the quantum yield (QY) of PSII by using handheld FluorPen (FP-100 MX-LM, Photon System Instruments, Czech Republic). A weak measuring light was used to measure Fo, and then, a saturated pulse of 3,000 µmol m−2 s−1 was applied to measure Fm. QY of PSII was calculated using the formula: QY = Fv/Fm = (Fm – Fo)/Fm.
Fresh weight of the shoot and root was noted with the help of electric balance (BSM-220.4, Hanchen, China) after separating the shoot from the root; then, plants were dried in an electric oven (UN-110, Memmert, Germany) at 75°C for 72 h, and dry biomass was noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring P. davidiana Leaf Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the leaves fell (10 May 2020 and 10 August 2020), 24 seedlings of P. davidiana were randomly selected for each repetition to determine the leaf index. One and three months after inoculation, the chlorophyll content and leaf area of the upper, middle, and lower leaves without mechanical damage were measured with a SPAD chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502, Konica, Minolta Sensing, Inc., Sakai, Osaka, Japan) and a leaf area meter (LA 211, Systronics., New Delhi, India), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leaf Turgidity and Chlorophyll Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detached youngest, fully expanded leaf was weighed immediately to record fresh weight (FW) and then dipped in distilled water for 24 h at 4 °C. Later, the leaves were taken out from distilled water, wiped with tissue paper and weighed to determine turgid weight (TW), Then same leaves were placed in an oven for 72 h at 65 °C to record dry weight (DW). Leaf relative turgidity (RT) was measured using following formula reported by Barrs31 : RT=[(FWDW)/(TWDW)]×100
The fully expanded young leaves were used to estimate leaf chlorophyll content expressed as SPAD value. The observations were made early in the morning between 9.00 and 11.00 a.m. using chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502, Minolta Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Chlorophyll and Gas Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intact, second fully-expanded leaves from the apex were used to measure relative chlorophyll content with the help of a handheld chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD-502, Tokyo, Japan) according to Wu et al. [36] . Three measurements were recorded from each leaf and averaged. The gas exchange parameters (i.e., photosynthetic rates (Pn), intercellular CO 2 concentrations (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rates (Tr)) were measured on a bright sunny day between 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. using a Li-Cor-6400 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was measured at 25 DAT according to Genty et al. [37] . Both treated and control plants were shifted to an experimental room, kept in the dark for 25 min, flag leaf were cut for the determination of chlorophyll fluorescence using a pulse-modulated chlorophyll fluorimeter using IMAGING-PAM (Walz; Effeltrich, Germany) image processing software. Fluorescence values observed comprised of Fo, initial/minimal fluorescence, Fm, the maximal fluorescence value, and Fv/Fm, the maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry. The data were noted at five different points at 40, 70, 120, 150, and 180 mm from leaf tips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Leaf Chlorophyll in Lycium barbarum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three pieces of complete and healthy Lycium barbarum leaves were randomly taken from each tree with treatment tag marking, and their chlorophyll contents (SPAD) were measured using a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD–502 model, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan), with their average values finally calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chlorophyll Content Estimation via SPAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPAD index, as a non-invasive measurement for chlorophyll content estimation, was measured by reading ten individual points on ten seedlings of each treatment were measured with SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development–SPAD-502; Konica Minolta Sensing Inc, Japan) equipment. A barley leaf was app. 10–15 cm long, so measurements were taken along the full length of each leaves in app. every 1–1.5 cm. The reason for this was to get an overall, thus realistic picture of the leaf.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nondestructive Chlorophyll and Crop Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
-SPAD value (Minolta SPAD-502) -easy non-destructive measurement of the chlorophyll content of plant leaves without damaging the leaves; -NDVI value (Green Seeker Model 505) -can be used to monitor crop growth and development.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!