The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Securityguard c18 guard column

Manufactured by Phenomenex
Sourced in United States

The SecurityGuard C18 guard column is a pre-column designed to protect the analytical column from contaminants and particulates. It features a C18 stationary phase and is intended to be placed upstream of the analytical column to extend the lifetime of the system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using securityguard c18 guard column

1

Paclitaxel Quantification in Tumors and Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors and plasma samples were prepared and paclitaxel concentrations were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Briefly, the samples were extracted with 100% acetonitrile containing carbamazepine as an internal standard, and chromatography was conducted on an Xterra C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 5 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (2.0 × 4.0 mm i.d., Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) maintained at room temperature. The mobile phase was 95% v/v solvent A (deionized water containing 0.1% v/v formic acid)/5% v/v solvent B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% v/v formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. A linear gradient of the two solvents was used: start at 95% A and hold for 0.5 min, ramp to 5% A to 0.6 min, and hold until 4 min. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min throughout the gradient. The retention times of paclitaxel and the internal standard (IS) were 3.0 and 2.8 min, respectively. The electrospray ionization source was operated at 5500 V and 550°C. The samples were analyzed via multiple reaction monitoring. The monitoring ions were set as m/z 876 → 308 for paclitaxel and m/z 237 → 194 for the IS. The scan dwell time was 0.1 sec for each channel. Acquisition and analysis of data were performed using the Analyst software ver. 1.5.2 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Clopidogrel and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS was performed using a Waters Alliance 2695 LC system accompanied with a column oven (Milford, USA) and coupled with a Micromass Quattro Micro tandem MS system (Micromass, UK), which was equipped with an electrospray ionization source and operated with the MassLynx 4.0 software.
The analytes were separated on a Sapphire C18 analytical column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Sepax Technologies Inc., USA) with a Security Guard C18 guard column (25 mm × 3.0 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, USA), which were maintained at 40 °C using a mobile phase of 0.1% aqueous formic acid and acetonitrile (1:19, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The volume of injection was 30 μL and the analytical run time was 5.5 minutes. The eluent from the HPLC column was introduced directly to the micromass using the electrospray ionization interface in the positive ion mode. The detection parameters were optimized as follows: source temperature, 120 °C; nitrogen desolvation gas, 370 °C with a flow rate of 500 L/hours. The specific transitions for the analytes were monitored using multiple-reaction-monitoring mode. The transitions, m/z 322.0 → 212.0 for clopidogrel; m/z 338.0 → 183.0 for 2-Oxo-CLP; m/z 504.0 → 354.0 for CAMD; and m/z 430.0 → 372.0 for IS, were chosen for the quantification of the analytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LC-MS/MS Analysis of FTY720 Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples resulting from liver microsomal incubations were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Aliquots of the supernatants were injected onto an X-Bridge C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5-μm particles) (Waters, Milford, MA), preceded by a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (4.0 × 2.0 mm; Phenomenex Inc.). Separations were accomplished with a gradient of 0.1% acetic acid in water (v/v) versus 0.1% acetic acid in acetonitrile: methanol (75:25, v/v) at a rate of 0.8 mL/min. The eluents were further applied into an equipped API 4000 QTrap mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) with electrospray ionization (ESI) interface by two coupled LC-10 AT pumps. Peak area ratios of FTY720-C2 or FTY720-Mitoxy against the C17 sphingosine internal standard were used to determine the amount of parent remaining compared to that at 0 min. The percent of FTY720-C2 or FTY720-Mitoxy remaining was calculated by dividing the peak area ratio obtained at each time point by that obtained at 0 min. The in vitro intrinsic clearance (CLint) was calculated by linear regression of the log percent of compound remaining versus time plots using Microsoft Excel, two independent experiments (n = 2) were performed for each compound and species. Then, the mean and standard deviation (SD), of two values for each condition, were calculated using Microsoft Excel with the “AVERAGE” and “STDEV” functions, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS system consisted of Agilent 1290 Infinity HPLC system and Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer equipped with dual AJS ESI ion source (Agilent Technologies Korea, Seoul, Korea). Chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm) with a Phenomenex Security Guard C18 guard column (4 × 20 mm) maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in deionized water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in CH3CN (B): 0~2 min 5% B, 2~7 min to 95% B, and 7~10 min 95% B. Total run time including a 5 min equilibration time was 15 min. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The injection volume was 5 µL. The mass spectrometer was operated in a positive Auto MS/MS scan mode with a full scan mass range of m/z 100–1000, fragmentor voltage 150 V, and CE 30 eV, selecting the two most intense precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation. Putative metabolites were identified using Agilent Mass Hunter Metabolite ID software (ver.B.04.00) followed by manual interpretation of the spectral data. Chromatograms and mass spectra were extracted using Agilent Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis software (ver. B.05.00).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Determination of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen microliters of blood-and-brain medium was mixed with 135 μL internal standard (IS) solution (5 ng/mL disopyramide in acetonitrile). The mixture was vortexed briefly and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (100 μL) was transferred to a sample vial for LC-MS/MS analysis using a liquid chromatograph (Agilent 1260) and 4000 Qtrap quadruple mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS, AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) analysis. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Luna C18 column (100 × 2 mm (i.d.) 3 μm, Phenomenex) with a Security Guard C18 guard column (4 mm × 20 mm (i.d.), Phenomenex) by gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min (Table 2). The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode for all compounds, and the carryover was checked by the injection of a blank in between samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Determination of Tramadol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tramadol concentrations were determined using HPLC fluorescence detection based on the method of De Leo et al.18 (link) An Agilent G1321 fluorescence detector was operated at an excitation wavelength of 275 nm and an emission wavelength of 302 nm. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Gemini C18 column (150×2.0 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, USA) with a Security Guard C18 guard column. A mixture of acetonitrile and 0.04 mol/L NaH2PO3 (pH 4.0) =25:75 (v/v) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The temperature of the column and autosampler was maintained at 35°C and 4°C, respectively. The chromatographic run time of each sample was 12 minutes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ceramide Quantification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ceramide quantification was performed by LC-MS/MS technique on a Shimadzu Prominence UPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a thermostatted autosampler, binary pump, degasser, and thermostatted column compartment. The chromatographic separation was performed on an XTerra MS C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 5 μm particles; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, United States) with a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (4 mm × 20 mm I.D.; Phenomenex, United States). MS analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems API2000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive and negative electrospray ionization mode. Quantification of each compound was achieved by comparison of the analyte/internal standard peak area ratios using C16, C18, C20, C24:1, and C24:0 ceramide mixtures (0–2000 pmol) as calibration standards. Acquisition and analysis of data were performed with AnalystTM software (version 1.4.2, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States). K562 cells treated with either vehicle control or cedrol were harvested and total 200 μg protein cell lysates were used for ceramide species quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of GH501 and LG1980

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic separation was achieved using a Waters Atlantis dC-18 (2.1 × 30 mm, 3 µm) column coupled with a Phenomenex SecurityGuard C-18 guard column (4.0 mm × 2.0 mm). The column temperature was controlled at 25 °C. Mobile phase A was 10 mM ammonium formate/0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B was ACN. The injection volume was 30 µL and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The autosampler injection needle was washed with ACN after each injection. The gradient condition for GH501 was: (time/minute, % mobile phase B): (0, 30), (8, 80), (9, 30), (15, 30) and for LG1980 was as follows: (time/minute, % mobile phase B): (0, 45), (0.1, 95), (4, 95), (5, 45), (10, 45). Samples were analyzed by the mass spectrometer in positive ion ESI mode. Nitrogen was used as the desolvation gas at a flow rate of 500 L/h for GH501 and 400 L/h for LG1980. For GH501, the cone gas flow was set to 30 L/h. For both compounds the desolvation temperature was 500 °C and the source temperature was 120 °C. Argon was used as the collision gas and the collision cell pressure was 2.5 × 10−3m bar for GH501 and 5.5 × 10−3m for LG1980. A summary of the cone voltages, collision energies, and precursor and product ions of the analytes is presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bile Acids Quantification by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids from tissue and fecal extracts were injected in volumes of 5 μL and gradient eluted onto a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (3.2 × 8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Ascentis Express HPLC C18 column (25 cm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm particle size, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Mobile phase A consisted of H2O with 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Bile acids were eluted on a linear gradient of 20%–60% B for 15 minutes, followed by 60%–100% B for 15 minutes, and 100%–20% B for 30 minutes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. All analytes were measured on a TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with an identity transition. Optimal collision energies were determined empirically before each experiment. Quantification was determined using a calibration curve from 5 μL injections of 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 μM bile acid standards using Xcaliber Quant Browser (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bile Acids Quantification by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids from tissue and fecal extracts were injected in volumes of 5 μL and gradient eluted onto a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (3.2 × 8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Ascentis Express HPLC C18 column (25 cm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm particle size, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Mobile phase A consisted of H2O with 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Bile acids were eluted on a linear gradient of 20%–60% B for 15 minutes, followed by 60%–100% B for 15 minutes, and 100%–20% B for 30 minutes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. All analytes were measured on a TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with an identity transition. Optimal collision energies were determined empirically before each experiment. Quantification was determined using a calibration curve from 5 μL injections of 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 μM bile acid standards using Xcaliber Quant Browser (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!