The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cytospin machine

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Cytospin machine is a laboratory instrument used for the preparation of cell samples for microscopic examination. Its core function is to concentrate cells onto a microscope slide, allowing for a more detailed analysis of the cellular morphology and composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using cytospin machine

1

Neutrophil Phagocytosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neutrophils (2.5 × 106 ml− 1), either in the presence or in the absence of erythrocytes and/or adenosine (10− 8 M or 10− 5 M), were resuspended in RPMI with 10% foetal bovine serum with and without ticagrelor (10− 5 M) in a final volume of 100 μl in a 96-well plate. Assays were performed in duplicate. To allow visualisation of neutrophil phagocytosis by microscopy, it was necessary to dilute the erythrocytes, which were therefore resuspended at 12.5 × 106 ml− 1. Heat-killed, opsonized Streptococcus pneumoniae was added to achieve a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 and incubated for 30 min (37 °C, 5% CO2). Cytocentrifuge slides were prepared from the cell suspension using a Cytospin machine (Shandon, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and stained with modified Giemsa based stains (Differentiation-Quik, Reagena, Toivala, Findland). The percentage of neutrophils containing phagocytosed S. pneumoniae was determined by assessment of 300 neutrophils by light microscopy. Neutrophil phagocytic index was then determined using the following formula: (total number of engulfed bacteria / total number of counted neutrophils) × (number of neutrophils containing engulfed bacteria / total number of counted neutrophils) [20] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neutrophil Quantification in Murine Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAL from healthy and infected mice were obtained as described above. After centrifugation, cell pellets were suspended with 1× RBC lysis buffer (BD Bioscience; CA, USA) and incubated at room temperature for 3 mins. Cells were washed with PBS twice followed by resuspension with 100μl 1× PBS. Cells were counted using an automated hematology analyzer. 1×105 cells were then spun down using a cytospin machine (Thermo Scientific; MA, USA) for 8 mins at room temperature. Slides were allowed to air dry before H&E staining with Hemacolor staining kit (EMD Millipore; Germany) following manufacture’s protocol. After staining, slides were allowed to air dry overnight before mounting with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories; CA, USA) and coverslip. Slides were then analyzed with a microscope and neutrophils were identified and counted based on their nuclear appearance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung Inflammation Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect the inflammation occurred in the lung, we counted the number of inflammatory cells in BALF by cytospin. In short, the cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 minutes at a 300 rpm in a Cytospin machine (Thermo). The numbers of macrophages and neutrophils were counted by a hemocytometer. The inflammasome activity in the lung was detected by using a Caspase 1 Inflammasome Assay Kit (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Mouse Lung Inflammatory Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main trachea of a mouse was cannulated, followed by a wash of the lung with 1 mL of PBS two times to collect bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids. Cells in the BAL fluids were counted and prepared for smears using a Cytospin machine (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The slides were air-dried and then stained with Hema-3 Stain kit (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA), which contained a cell fixative and eosin Y stain. The number of eosinophils, monocytes/macrophages (mon/Mφ), and lymphocytes per 200 cells were counted and differentiated based on cellular morphology and staining characteristics. Cells in the BAL were also analyzed by flow cytometry (Canto II, BD) for eosinophils with fluorescence-conjugated mAbs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Shrimp Hemolymph Necrosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hemolymph (100 µl) was withdrawn from the ventral sinus of each shrimp and diluted with 100 µl of anticoagulant solution (30 mM trisodium citrate, 340 mM sodium chloride, and 10 mM EDTA, at pH 7.5 with the osmolality adjusted to 718 mOsm/kg with 115 mM glucose). LPS, βG and PG solutions were prepared with shrimp salt solution (SSS, anticoagulant solution without EDTA) to make final concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/ml. Details of hemolymph sampling, treatment with LPS, βG and PG, and cell necrosis were conducted following previously described procedures [13] (link). Briefly, 100 µl of each test solution (LPS, βG, PG) was added to hemolymph sample and incubated for 30 min. A group that 100 µl of SSS was added to hemolymph sample and incubated for 30 min served as controls. The solution was added to 10 µl RNase (1 mg/ml) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and 20 µl of propidium iodine (PI, Sigma) solution then added and samples incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Fifty microliters of the mixed solution were spread on a slide glass and centrifuged with cytospin machine (Thermo, Shandon, UK) at 1000 rpm for 3 min. Permanent slides were made and examined under a fluorescent microscope (Model BX 51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) for cell death (necrosis) [22] . Hemocytes were also examined under a fluorescent microscope to determine the percentage of necrotic cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!