The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using pegrx

1

Screening and Optimization of MmATD Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified un-tagged MmATD was screened for crystallization conditions using different screens (Index, Crystal Screen HT, PEG/Ion and PEGRx from Hampton Research, USA) at two different temperatures—4 °C and 20 °C. Mosquito Crystal (TTP LabTech, UK) crystallization robot was used to set up crystallization experiments using sitting-drop vapor diffusion method by mixing 1 µl protein and 1 µl reservoir buffer in a 96-well MRC plate with three sub-wells (Molecular Dimensions, UK). The initial hits from the screens were further expanded for optimization using sitting-drop vapor diffusion method in 96-well format MRC plates having three sub-wells. Reservoir buffer with 0.1 M Bicine (pH 8.0) and 15% PEG1500 yielded good diffraction-quality crystals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized Crystallization of FlvF Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial crystallization conditions were identified using high throughput screens from Hampton Research (Index, PEG/Rx, PEG/Ion, and Crystal Screen), assembled in sitting-drop microplates (MRC Plate 96-well 2 drop) using the Mosquito liquid handler (sptlabtech). A 300-nL drop of protein solution [5 and 10 mg/mL FlvF, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM TCEP, and 10% glycerol] was added to 300 nL of precipitant solution and equilibrated against an 80-μL reservoir of precipitant solution. Crystals were grown by the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method at 4 °C. The precipitation buffer that yielded crystals [0.2 M MgCl2, 0.1 M Bis-Tris (pH 6.5), and 25% PEG 3,350] was systematically optimized using the Additive Screen (Hampton Research); the addition of 10 mM yttrium(III) chloride hexahydrate yielded higher-quality crystals that were harvested, soaked in cryoprotectant solution (mother liquor plus 20% glycerol), and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Determination of AtWRI1-DNA Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AtWRI1 (7.5 mg/ml) was mixed with equimolar AtWRI1-binding dsDNA BCCP2(-34/-11) (5′-TACTTCCTCGGTTTCATCGTCCAC) and incubated at 4°C for 1 hour. Crystallization screening was performed with Crystal Screen, Index, PEG Rx, and PEG/Ion Screen (Hampton Research) using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method at 20°C on an Intelli-Plate 96-3 LVR (Art Robbins Instruments). Crystals appeared during Crystal Screening under the A9 condition [0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate (pH 5.6), and 30% w/v polyethylene glycol 4000]. The final optimized condition for crystal growth was 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M MES (pH 6.5), and 28% w/v PEG 4000.
The native dataset of AtWRI1-DNA crystals was collected from the Swiss Light Source (SLS). SAD datasets for Se-Met–labeled AtWRI1-DNA crystals were collected at an inflection wavelength of 0.9795 Å with an Australian light source and SLS. All the datasets were processed using XDS (x-ray detector software) (48 (link)). The Phenix AutoSol program was used for phasing, and four Se atoms were found in the substructure solution (figure of merit, 0.23). The structure served as a template to resolve native AtWRI1-DNA structures through molecular replacement. The models were built and refined using Phenix and Coot (41 (link), 49 (link)). All the structure-related figures were generated with PyMOL (50 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Crystallization of MetNIQ Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The native MetNIQ and selenomethionine-substituted MetNIQ complexes were prepared as described previously (17 (link)). Crystallization screens for MetNIQ were conducted at different concentrations, 5–20 mg/mL, by vapor diffusion in hanging drops at 20 °C using three different commercial kits, including MemGold2, MORPHEUS (Molecular Dimension), and PEGRx (Hampton Research). MetNIQ was crystallized in a reservoir containing 0.1 M Mes, pH 6, and 22% PEG 400, using 5 mg/mL protein at a ratio of protein to reservoir of 2:1. Crystals appeared after 2–3 d, fully grew after 5–7 d, and shattered after 10–14 d. Crystals were harvested at day 7 and cryoprotected by increasing PEG 400 concentration to 25, 30, and then 35%, followed by flash-freezing for data collection. Selenomethionine-substituted MetNIQ crystals often diffracted better than the native ones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pro-tHAP Crystallization Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified pro-tHAP sample was concentrated to 10 mg-mL−1 and used for crystallization. Crystallization screens were set up with a Phoenix crystallization robot (Protein Crystallography Facility, IIT Bombay) using commercial screens (JCSG CORE I and PEG-Suite (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany); INDEX, PEG-Ion and PEG-Rx (Hampton Research)), by the sitting drop vapor diffusion method at 295 K. Each well contained 0.3 μL protein and 0.3 μL of reservoir solution, equilibrated against 50 μL of reservoir solution. Crystals of pro-tHAP were obtained in three different crystallization conditions: (a) 200 mM ammonium citrate tribasic pH 7.0, 100 mM imidazole pH 7.0, 20% w/v polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether 2000; (b) 200 mM lithium citrate tribasic tetrahydrate, 20% w/v polyethylene glycol 3350; and (c) 200 mM ammonium phosphate dibasic, 20% w/v polyethylene glycol 3350. The crystals grew to their maximum size within 4–5 days. The pro-tHAP structures solved with the crystals obtained in crystallization conditions a, b, and c are referred to here as HAP-zymo1, HAP-zymo2, and HAP-zymo3, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Crystallization of AtBioZ Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, 0.6 μl of AtBioZ protein (~15 mg/ml) mixed with 0.6 μl of the screening buffer was subjected to the routine screen of crystallization using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method. Five different screening kits were used: (i) Crystal screen I & II (Hampton Research), (ii) Index comprising 96 reagents (Hampton Research); (iii) PEG/ion, a kit of high purity Polyethylene glycol 3350 in combinations with 48 unique salts (Hampton Research); (iv) PEGRx, a polymer- and pH-based crystallization screen (Hampton Research); and (v) WIZAED screen (Rigaku). As a result, crystals with good diffraction were grown in 0.2 M sodium nitrate and 20% (v/v) PEG 3350 at 16 °C on the 3rd day post-screen. The crystals were harvested and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen with 20% glycerol as a cryoprotectant. Collection of X-ray diffraction data were performed at BL17U1 beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). Diffraction images were calculated by HKL-2000 program65 (link). The initial model was solved by molecular replacement (MR) using the structure of Staphylococcus aureus FabH (PDB: 1ZOW) as the searching model66 (link),67 (link). Model building and crystallographic refinement were conducted with COOT and PHENIX68 (link),69 (link). The final structure of AtBioZ was solved at 1.99 Å (Table 1) and deposited into the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the accession entry: 6KUE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Crystallization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For crystallization, the proteins were transferred to a PBS buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM K2HPO4 pH 7.4 and were concentrated to 15 – 31 mg/ml. An initial search for crystallization conditions was carried out using a Mosquito Robotic Crystallization System (TTP LabTech Ltd). In its standard setup robot mixed 0.4 μl of protein with 0.4 μl of well solution and the drops were further incubated against 140 μl of the same reservoir solution at 20 °C for two days. All proteins were tested against Classic, Index, SaltRX, PEG/Ion, PEGRx, and Grid Screen Salt crystallization screens (Hampton Research). To preserve the fluorescent state of the proteins, we used only neutral pH hits for further optimization. Large-scale crystallization was set up by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method at room temperature (20°C). Typically, 2 μl of the protein was mixed with the same amount of well solution and incubated against 0.5 ml of the same well solution for two weeks. The crystallization conditions are given in Table 1S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sparse-Matrix Crystallization Screening of J30 Enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial sparse-matrix crystallization screening of wild-type J30 was conducted using the following screens: Berkeley (from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Pereira et al., 2017 ▸ ), Crystal Screen, Index, Natrix, PEG/Ion, PEGRx, SaltRx (all from Hampton Research) and MCSG-1 (from Microlytic) (Jancarik & Kim, 1991 ▸ ). They were set up using a Phoenix Robot (Art Robbins Instruments). At a concentration of 12 mg ml−1 purified enzyme, the protein was crystallized in 0.1 M trisodium citrate dihydrate pH 5, 15%(w/v) 2-propanol, 10%(w/v) PEG 10 000. Suitably sized crystals were obtained after 3 d of growth at room temperature using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method. J30 CCH crystals were prepared in the same manner. All drops consisted of 1 µl protein solution and 0.5 µl reservoir solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Crystallization and Structure Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein was crystallized at 15 mg ml−1 as described above. Commercially available crystallization screens (PEG Ion, SaltRX, PEG-Rx and Index (Hampton Research)) and custom screens (PEG-custom and Bis-Tris magnesium formate) were employed. Thin plate crystals appeared in 3 days under many conditions, with the largest (100 × 100 × 10 µm) in 200 mM L-proline, 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10% w/v PEG 3350 or in 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 30% v/v PEG 550 MME. The crystals were mounted, frozen and diffracted as described above. A single thin plate crystal diffracted to 3.2 Å resolution (I/σ ≥ 2.0) and was initially indexed into a primitive orthorhombic unit cell with dimensions a = 45.9 Å,b = 63.6 Å, c = 165.6 Å, α = β = γ = 90°. The top indexing solution included only 38% of the non-ice reflections. The P212121 space group readily gave a clear molecular replacement solution but multiple attempts at subsequent extensive refinement were unable to produce Rwork/Rfree values below 0.27/0.31. The data were rescaled into space group P1211 with dimensions a = 46.0 Å,b = 63.6 Å, c = 166.0 Å, α = 90°, β = 90.162°, γ = 90°. This indexing solution also included 38% of the non-ice reflections. Molecular replacement again readily identified a solution. Subsequent refinement using space group P1211 resulted in much lower Rwork/Rfree values (0.23/0.24).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimizing Protein Crystal Growth Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial crystallization screening was performed using Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, Index, PEGRx, PEG/Ion (Hampton Research), The PACT Suite (Qiagen) and Wizard I and II (Emerald Bio) by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in 96-well plates. Drops were comprised of 0.1 µl sample and an equal volume of reservoir solution and were equilibrated against 70 µl reservoir solution at 20°C. Subsequent optimization of the initial hit conditions was performed using hanging-drop vapour diffusion at 20°C by changing the pH value of the reservoir solution and the concentrations of the buffer and precipitant, and by using various additives. The hanging drops were set up by mixing 1.5 µl sample solution with 1.5 µl reservoir solution and were equilibrated against 500 µl reservoir solution in 24-well plates. The initial screening yielded crystals in two conditions: (i) 0.1 M bicine pH 8.5, 15%(w/v) PEG 1500 (PEGRx condition No. 21) and (ii) 0.1 M imidazole pH 8.0, 10%(w/v) PEG 8000 (Wizard II condition No. 34). The small and fragile crystals obtained from the former condition could not be improved, while single crystals could be obtained by optimizing the latter condition. Finally, well diffracting crystals (0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm) were produced with reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 M imidazole pH 8.0, 9%(w/v) PEG 8000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!