The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using rat anti ly6b 2

1

Quantifying Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical procedures were performed as previously described54 (link). Sections were probed for 40 h at room temperature with rat anti-CD4 (1:500, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), rat anti-CD68 or rat anti-Ly6B.2 (1:1,000, AbD Serotec, Bio-Rad, Raleigh, NC, USA), goat anti-5-HT (1:5000, Immunostar, Hudson, WI, USA), rat anti-CD117 (1:500, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), or sheep anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibody (1:4000, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA). After washing in PBS, sections were incubated for 4 h at room temperature with corresponding secondary antibody. Quantitative determinations were made from three random locations for each mouse. For analysis, the number of CD4-, CD68-, Ly6B.2-, 5-HT-, and CD117-immunopositive cells, and CGRP-immunopositive neurons were counted per 106 µm2 area of tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spinal Cord Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cord sections were processed as above. For immunofluorescence, slides were first desiccated for at least two hours and blocked with 5% Normal Donkey Serum with or without 0.3% Triton-X 100. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C: goat anti-CXCL1 1:50 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), rabbit anti – GFAP 1:500 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), rat anti – Ly-6B.2 1:100 (Serotec, Raleigh, NC), rabbit anti - Iba11:500 (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA), rabbit anti – GST-π 1:1000 (MBL, Woburn, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescent Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-XB130 (1:1,000, Abgent, San Diego, CA), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:100, Lab Vision, Fremont, CA), rat anti-Ly-6B.2 (1:10,000, AbD Serotec, Raleigh, GC), rat anti-F4/80 (1:500, AbD Serotec), goat anti-podoplanin (PDPN) (1:50, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), rabbit anti-surfactant protein C (SFTPC, for type II cells)(1:1,000, Seven Hills Bioreagents, Cincinnati, OH) and rabbit anti-phospho-GSK-3β-Ser9 (1:500, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA). After incubation with primary antibodies, sections were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies. IHC was performed using a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, Canada) with 3-3-diaminobenzidine as chromogen, and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and images were captured via Olympus BX51-FL. For IF, the secondary antibodies used were: donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor® 488, donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 555 and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor® 555 (1:200, Invitrogen, Burlington, Canada), and sections were mounted with Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI® (Invitrogen). The slides were examined with an Olympus BX-51, and images were captured via QImaging colour camera (Olympus Co, Ltd). We randomly chose 5 fields (×200) per slide for positive cell counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of CNS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were sectioned at 30 μm on a sliding knife microtome with a −25 °C freezing stage. Sections were stored in cryoprotectant at −20 °C until processing. Antibody staining was visualized using immunofluorescent secondary antibodies bound to Alexa fluorophores (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:500. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-6E10 (Covance, clone 6E10, 1:1000), goat anti-Arginase 1 (Santa Cruz, sc-18354, 1:500), rabbit anti-iNOS (Enzo, ADI-905-431-1, 1:500), rabbit anti-NeuN (Millipore, ABN78, 1:1000), rabbit anti-GFAP (Dako, Z0334, 1:3000), rabbit anti-Iba1 (Wako, 016–20001, 1:3000), rabbit anti-Cd11c (Thermo Scientific, PA1-46162, 1:500), rat anti-Ly-6B.2 (Serotec, clone 7/4, 1:1000), rat anti-CD3 (BD Bioscience, clone G4.18, 1:500), and rat anti-Lamp1 (DSHB, clone D1B4, 1:2000). For Congo red staining, Kit HT60 from Sigma-Aldrich was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Inflammatory Cells in Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cord sections were processed as described above. For immunofluorescence, slides were first desiccated for two hours and blocked with 5% Normal Donkey Serum with or without 0.3% Triton‐X 100. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C: goat anti‐CXCL1 1:50 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), rabbit anti‐GFAP 1:500 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and rat anti‐Ly6B.2 1:100 (Serotec, Raleigh, NC). Images were analyzed using the Image J software (NIH) according to previously described methods 61, 62. Quantification of Ly6B.2‐positive cells within spinal cords of experimental mice was determined by counting cells in a minimum of five spinal cord sections/per mouse with a minimum of three mice per group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spinal Cord Immunofluorescence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cord sections were processed as described above. For
immunofluorescence, slides were first desiccated for two hours and blocked with
5% Normal Donkey Serum with or without 0.3% Triton-X 100.
Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C: goat anti-CXCL1 1:50
(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), rabbit anti-GFAP 1:500 (Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and rat anti-Ly6B.2 1:100 (Serotec, Raleigh, NC).
Images were analyzed using the Image J software (NIH) according to previously
described methods [62 (link), 63 (link)]. Quantification of
Ly6B.2-positive cells within spinal cords of experimental mice was determined by
counting cells in a minimum of 5 spinal cord sections/per mouse with a minimum
of 3 mice per group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!