The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

E7tools

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States, Germany

The E7tools is a set of laboratory equipment designed for various scientific and research applications. It provides essential tools and instruments for use in controlled laboratory environments. The core function of the E7tools is to facilitate standardized procedures and experimentation in a laboratory setting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using e7tools

1

PET/CT and PET/MR Image Reconstruction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both PET/CT and PET/MR off-line PET reconstructions were carried out using e7tools (Siemens Healthcare). The full list-mode acquisitions were reconstructed without time-of-flight correction or resolution modeling. Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM) algorithm with the following parameters were employed: 256 × 256 field of view, 4 iterations, 21 subsets, 5 mm Gaussian filter. The CT was used for attenuation correction of the PET/CT data. PET data acquired on PET/MR were first reconstructed applying the standard Dixon attenuation correction method (4 tissue class segmentation; air, lung, soft tissue and fat). PET data were then also reconstructed applying a custom MR attenuation correction map derived from the free-breathing radial GRE sequence [2 tissue classes: background (air and lung) and soft tissue (soft tissue and fat)].3 (link),8 (link) ECG gating was not applied for either modality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

18F-FET PET/MRI Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were positioned head first with their arms down on the fully integrated PET/MRI system. Data were acquired in list mode over 20–40 min (or 0–40 min for a subset of patients) after injection of 200 MBq [18F]FET over a single bed position of 25.8 cm covering the head and neck. For the purpose of this study, the PET data from the PET/MRI acquisition were reconstructed offline (E7tools, Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, USA) using 3D ordinary poisson-ordered subset expectation maximization (OP-OSEM) with 4 iterations, 21 subsets, zoom 2.5, and a 5 mm Gaussian post-filtering on 344 × 344 matrices (0.8 mm3 × 0.8 mm3 × 2.0 mm3 voxels) in line with the clinical protocol used at our institution. We reconstructed the summed 20-min PET image for all patients (over 20–40 min for the patients imaged over 0–40 min), and in addition for the subset with 0–40 min dynamic imaging, we also reconstructed a dynamic series split into 14 frames (5 min × 1 min, 5 min × 3 min, 4 min × 5 min) similar to Galldiks et al. (2015b) (link). For all images default random, scatter, and dead time correction were applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Motion-Corrected PET Imaging with MR Navigators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sparsely sampled MR navigators interleaved between MR sequences were used to perform motion correction of PET images (Keller et al., 2015 (link)). The initial navigator (Nav-0) was considered as the reference volume, and all subsequent navigators (Nav-1 to Nav-13) were rigidly aligned to Nav-0 using SPM 12 (Wellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, UCL), yielding a set of motion vectors (MV-1 to MV-13, three translations, and three rotation parameters). A correspondence between the MR navigators and PET emission data was assumed based on the least temporal difference between the MR navigator acquisition time and the PET frame mid-scan time. To account for spatial misalignment between the static CT-derived AC map and the PET emission data, the inverse of the MVs (iMVs) were applied to the AC map, which resulted in a set of motion-corrected AC maps (MoCo-AC). The obtained MoCo-AC maps were then employed for reconstruction of the dynamic PET emission data using the Siemens e7 tools.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Correcting PET Artifacts with Surface Coil μ-Map

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because mMR surface coils include some metal components, we decided to acquire the µ-map of the surface coils using a transmission scan to avoid CT metal artifacts. A transmission scan of an anthropomorphic phantom (Data Spectrum Corporation, Hillsborough, NC) with a Siemens mMR surface coil array attached [See Figure 1 (A)] was first acquired on a Siemens ECAT HR+ scanner. The same phantom was filled with F-18 in both the liver and soft-tissue compartments (liver/background concentration ratio: 2.4). Additionally, three 1-cm “tumors” were placed around the liver (tumor/liver concentration ratio: 4). The phantom was placed in a Siemens Biograph PET-CT scanner. First, a CT with 120 kVp was acquired. Second, an mMR surface coil array was placed on the top of the phantom in the same way as we did the transmission scan. Third, a PET acquisition which included total 279 million coincidence events was performed. The CT image was first transformed into a µ-map, denoted phantom-µ-map, using Siemens e7 tools. The coil image obtained from the transmission scan was digitally added to the phantom-µ-map to create another µ-map, denoted phantom-coil-µ-map. The PET data were reconstructed twice: one with phantom-µ-map and one with phantom-coil-µ-map. A bias image was then calculated using the image reconstructed with phantom-coil-µ-map as the reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

C11 Methionine PET Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C11 methionine PET images were loaded into SIEMENS SYNGO Via (VB30) workstation after correcting for partial volume effects (PVE) using Siemens E7 tools (Fig. 1A, B). The 3D ROI was drawn semi-automatically using an individually adapted isocontour of the tumor maximum using a standard ROI with a fixed diameter of 1.6 cm centered on the tumor maximum yielding a volume of 2 ml (Fig. 1C). Similar mirror ROI was placed in the contralateral brain parenchyma to calculate the background /normal brain parenchymal uptake (Fig. 1C). The values SUVmax and SUVmean were obtained for both tumor and normal brain parenchyma and tabulated. Ratio TBR max and TBR mean (tumor to normal brain/background) were calculated for statistical analysis.

LIST mode UTE MRAC sequence reconstructed PET images (A) and images reprocessed on E7 tools SIEMENS for correction of partial volume effects (PVE) (B). 3D ROI was drawn semi-automatically using an individually adapted isocontour of the tumor maximum using a standard ROI with a fixed diameter of 1.6 cm centered on the tumor maximum yielding a volume of 2 ml (C)

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET Listmode Data Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From the mMR PET listmode data, only the first 10 minutes for each patient was used – this reduced the chance of artifacts due to patient motion. All PET reconstructions (OP-OSEM, 3 iterations and 21 subsets) were performed offline using JSRecon and e7tools provided by Siemens, using a 344×344×127 matrix with pixel size of 2.09 mm2 and slice thickness of 2.03 mm. Next to the different human μ-maps, the corresponding hardware μ-maps were used to correct for attenuation and scatter due to the head coil and patient table. A post-reconstruction smoothing with a Gaussian filter and kernel width of 2mm full width at half maximum was applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PET Quantification Using DL-TESLA pCTs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CTs and pCTs were converted to PET LAC values by piecewise linear scaling (1 (link)). The vendor-provided e7tools program (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN) was employed to reconstruct PET list mode data acquired from 50–70 minutes post-tracer injection using an ordinary Poisson ordered subset expectations maximization (OP-OSEM) algorithm with 3 iterations, 21 subsets, and a 5 mm Gaussian filter. In the test-retest repeatability analysis, AC maps computed using acquired CTs and DL-TESLA pCTs from visit 1 and visit 2 were used to reconstruct visit 1 PET data. A comparison between PET data from visit 1 and visit 2 was avoided due to potential PET signal changes resulting from pathophysiological progression over 3 years.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET Imaging Protocol for 18F-FDG Brain Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET data for this project was extracted from an IRB approved, ongoing human study. A total of 35 PET studies were acquired and split into training (n=30) and testing (n=5). Each subject was administered between 148-185 MBq (4-5mCi) of 18F-FDG and asked to void their bladder immediately after injection. This ongoing study acquired listmode data collected using a dedicated head coil for 60 minutes immediately after the injection of 18F-FDG using a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MRI scanner. Attenuation map were generated using an MRI-based algorithm, namely the "Boston Method"26,27. Scanner attenuation maps were also extracted for reconstruction. PET images were reconstructed using Siemens' E7tools with ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). Two sets of images were reconstructed using all 60 minutes of emission data and emission data acquired between 50 and 60 minutes after injection with the same parameters (OSEM: 6 iterations, 21 subsets) and attenuation map. The dNet and uNet models were trained twice using these two different sets (reconstructed images from 60min emission and 10-min emission data).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Image Reconstruction Techniques for PET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three reconstruction schemes were considered: FBP, OP-OSEM, and PSF-OSEM. The image reconstruction was performed using Siemens e7-tools, which incorporated attenuation and scatter corrections using the acquired CT map of the phantom. For both OP-OSEM and PSF-OSEM, we used 2 iterations and 8 subsets unless stated otherwise. No post-reconstruction filtering was applied. All the image reconstruction was performed using 168×168×81 matrix size and 4.07×4.07×2.02 mm voxel size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Respiratory-Gated PET Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
List‐mode PET data were binned using the MR‐derived respiratory signal, so that one 3D set of span 11 sinograms per respiratory bin was created. Nonrigid motion fields estimated from MR were used to deform the µ‐map acquired at end expiration to each respiratory bin position. PET image reconstruction was performed separately for each respiratory bin in Siemens e7 Tools, using the OSEM algorithm with three iterations and 21 subsets, including point‐spread function modeling. Images were reconstructed with a voxel size of 2.08 × 2.08 × 2.03 mm3 and a matrix size of 344 × 344 × 127. Once all bins were reconstructed, they were transformed to the reference respiratory position and averaged in MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc.) to produce one motion‐corrected image (MC). The MC reconstruction required a set of OSEM reconstructions (∼240 seconds per bin), followed by 3D nonrigid deformation (∼10 seconds per bin) and finally averaging, for a total reconstruction time of 1,250 seconds. Additionally, 1) an uncorrected reconstruction including all the acquired PET data (NMC) and 2) a gated reconstruction at end expiration (Gated) were performed for comparison purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!