The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

0.22 μm pvdf filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany

The 0.22 μm PVDF filter is a laboratory filtration device designed to remove microorganisms and particulates from liquids. It features a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane with a pore size of 0.22 micrometers, which is effective at trapping bacteria, fungi, and other contaminants while allowing the passage of the desired fluid.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using 0.22 μm pvdf filter

1

Purification of Ub2 Disulfide-Linked Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain Ub2S-S fibrils, 1 mg ml−1 solution of Ub2S-S was incubated at 368 K for 20 minutes in 50 mM sodium phosphate and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.0. The solution was degassed, cooled to 277 K, before dithiothreitol (DTT, Nacalai Tesque) was added to a final concentration of 50 mM. The solution was then incubated at 277 K for more than 3 days, followed by centrifugation at 5,000 g for 10 minutes at 277 K and filtration using a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Merck Millipore). The filtered sample was purified at 277 K in the presence of 5 mM DTT by using a Hiload 16/60 Superdex 75 pg size exclusion column (GE Healthcare). The first peak (elution volume of peak top: approximately 78 ml) in the size exclusion chromatography was collected as the dissociation intermediates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Leaf Extract Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf juice powder, brewed leaf juice powder, and leaf decoction powder were dissolved at concentrations of 2 mg/mL in water then the obtained solutions subsequently filtered through a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Merck Millipore, Germany). When filtering, an adequate volume was passed through membrane filter; the first 1.0 mL was discarded and the remaining volume was collected in an HPLC vial, ready for injection.
To facilitate direct comparison among the extracts, the concentrations of extracts used in following cell viability assay and mass spectrometric/chemometric analysis were equivalently converted and expressed as concentrations of original leaf.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of m6A Modification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified mRNAs (150 ng) were digested with 2 U nuclease P1 (N8630, Sigma) in 30 μL of buffer containing 25 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM ZnCl2 for 2 h at 37°C, followed by the addition of 2 μL FastAP Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (EF0651, Thermo Scientific) and incubation at 37°C for 4 h. The samples were then filtered through a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Millipore) and transferred into mass spectrometry tubes. Ten μL of each sample was injected into a C18 reverse phase column coupled online to Agilent 6460 LC-MS/MS spectrometer in positive electrospray ionization mode. The nucleosides were quantified by using retention time and the nucleoside to base ion mass transitions (268-to-136 for A; 282-to-150 for m6A). Quantification was performed by comparing with the standard curve obtained from pure nucleoside standards running with the same batch of samples. The m6A/A ratio was calculated based on the calibrated concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All freeze-
and oven-dried materials (grape stems, grape pomace, and wine lees)
were prepared following the procedure described by Milinčić
et al.12 (link) with slight modifications. Briefly,
samples (100 mg) were first homogenized in 1 mL of ethanol, vortexed,
and sonicated at 40 kHz for 1 h (Branson 3510MT sonicator, Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) and maintained at 4 °C overnight. Afterward, the
samples were centrifuged at 8750 g, for 5 min, at
4 °C, and filtered through a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Millipore,
MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultracentrifugation methods were applied to isolate exosomes from the supernatants of SW620 and HCT8 cells as previous study46 (link). In brief, the cells were cultured in a complementary medium until about 80% confluence, and then the medium was replaced the defined medium without FBS. After 2 days of culture, we harvested the supernatants and centrifuged them at 300 × g for 15 min, 2000 × g for 15 min, and 10,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatants were filtrated through a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Millipore, USA). Then the supernatants were collected to isolate exosomes by ultracentrifugation at 120,000 × g for 70 min (Beckman Coulter) twice. Particle Metrix (PMX), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and western blotting were used to identify the exosomes.
The plasma exosomes and exosome RNA were isolated by SeraMir™ Exosome RNA Amplification Kit (SBI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 500 μl of plasma was used to combine with 120 μl ExoQuick incubated at 4 °C for 30 min and then we obtained the exosomes pellets by centrifuging at 13,000 r.p.m. for 2 min. The exosomes pellet was lysed with LYSIS Buffer, and next, we purified the exosome RNA. Plasma exosomes were also identified by PMX, TEM, and western blotting. The exosome RNA levels were normalized by exogenous λ polyA RNA (Takara, China) for qPCR47 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lentivirus Production and Transduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lentivirus preparation and infection was performed as previously described [15 (link)]. Briefly, lentiviral particles were generated by cotransfecting HEK 293FT cells with virus packaging vectors. HEK 293FT cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) in 10% FBS, 100 units/ml streptomycin, and 100 mg/ml penicillin with 2 mM glutamax (Life Technologies). Transfection was performed using PEI (Polysciences, Warrington, PA). Five hours after transfection, the medium was changed. Virus supernatant was harvested 60 h posttransfection, filtered with a 0.22-μm PVDF filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA), ultracentrifuged at 25,000 rpm using a P28S rotor (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and stocked in a final volume of 100 μl. The titer of the lentivirus used in all cell culture experiments was at least 5.0 × 108 infectious units (IUs) per ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were isolated as described previously39 (link). Briefly, conditioned medium was harvested 48 hours after cell seeding. After centrifugation at 3000 g to remove cellular debris, the supernatant was filtered through 0.22-μm PVDF filter (Millipore) to remove large vesicles. Exoquick Exosome Precipitation Solution (System Biosciences) was added to the filtered culture medium and mixed well. After refrigeration for 12 h, the mixture was centrifuged at 1500 g for 30 min. Exosome pellets were resuspended with PBS. The protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad) as previously reported40 (link). To confirm the contents of the purified exosome samples, we performed immunoblotting to detect tetraspanin CD63 (Supplementary Fig. 6A). The size distribution of the exosomes in the culture supernatants was evaluated with the NanoSight LM10 system using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) software v2.3 (NanoSight Ltd, Amesbury, UK). The mean vesicle size in the samples was 89 nm (Supplementary Fig. 6B), in accordance with previous reports35 (link)41 (link). Purified exosomes were added to the culture medium at a concentration of 50 μg/ml. For plasma samples, exosome isolation was performed using ExoQuick Plasma prep and the Exosome precipitation kit (System Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exosome Purification and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For exosome purification, CM was pre-cleared by filtration through a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Millipore, USA). Exosomes were isolated from the CM by differential centrifugation steps as previously described [53 (link)]. The size and concentration of the exosomes were quantified using NanoSight NS300 instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK) equipped with NTA 3.0 analytical software (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). In addition, the plasma exosomes were isolated using ExoQuick Plasma prep and Exosome precipitation kit (SBI, USA). For exosomal RNA and protein extraction, exosomes were pretreated with RNase or Proteinase K, respectively. The exosome fraction protein content was assessed by Pierce® BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Exosome Isolation from HUVEC Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The medium of HUVECs was collected and centrifuged at 3 000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered through 0.22-μm PVDF filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The appropriate volume of Exoquick Exosome Precipitation Solution (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) was added to the filtered culture medium and mixed well by inverting. After 10 h refrigeration, the mixture was centrifuged at 2 000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was removed by aspiration. Exosome pellets were re-suspended using 500 μl of the serum-free AIM V medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Formulation for RV3-BB Vaccine Candidate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrated excipient stock solutions were prepared, pH adjusted to 7.8 and sterile filtered using a 0.22 μm PVDF filter (Millipore). Calculated amounts of the excipient stocks were combined with media, which was then mixed with RV3-BB bulk drug substance in 50 mL sterile conical tubes. All formulation preparations were carried out in a class II biosafety cabinet (Labconco, USA). The two main formulations used in this study contained 60% (w/v) sucrose, 0.01% (w/v) PEG 3350, 25% (v/v) Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) in a sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.8. Formulation A also contained 400 mM sodium succinate while formulation B does not contain sodium succinate (unless otherwise stated).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!