The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using affymetrix genechip mouse gene 2.0 st array

1

Gene Expression Profiling of Brain Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from dissected brain region tissue using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A custom chip definition format version 21 with Entrez based gene definitions was used to annotate the arrays. The raw fluorescence intensity values were normalized applying quantile normalization. Differential gene expression was analyzed with ANOVA using JMP Genomics 13 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A false positive rate of α = 0.05 with false discovery rate correction was taken as the level of significance. The raw and normalized data have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE124791 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124791).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Arid5b Knockout Transcriptome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from Arid5b+/+ and Arid5b−/− myoblasts in triplicate using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen) and DNase treated using the RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen). RNA quality was assessed using the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sense-strand cDNA was generated using the Ambion WT Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and was hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results were analyzed using Genomics Suite software (Partek, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software (Qiagen). Gene expression changes with a fold difference >1.5 and P < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microarray Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual RNA samples were analyzed using Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Cat. 902118, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) and GeneChip WT PLUS Reagent Kit (Cat. 902280, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Microarray data analysis was performed using the Rosetta Resolver software system (Rosetta Bio Software, Seattle, WA). Significantly different mRNA levels were defined using the following criteria: one-way ANOVA with Benjamini and Hochberg FDR (p ≤ 0.05), signal correction statistics (Ratio Builder software, Rosetta Resolver) (p ≤ 0.05), and an expression value ratio between the different conditions of 1.5-fold10 (link),22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microarray Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array (Thermo Fisher) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A Custom CDF V. 22 with ENTREZ-based gene definitions was used to annotate the arrays.23 (link) The raw fluorescence intensity values were normalized by applying quantile normalization and robust multiarray analysis background correction. A batch normalization was used to remove the individual mouse variations. An analysis of variance was performed to identify differentially expressed genes using the commercial software package SAS JMP Genomics, V. 7 (SAS Institute). A false positive rate of a=0.05 with false discovery rate correction was taken as the level of significance. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to determine whether defined lists (or sets) of genes exhibit a statistically significant bias in their distribution within a ranked gene list.24 (link) Pathways belonging to different cell functions were obtained from public external databases (KEGG, http://www.genome.jp/kegg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of Epidermal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA from was isolated from epidermis of 3–6 animals per group and pooled. The Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A Custom CDF V. 22 with ENTREZ-based gene definitions was used to annotate the arrays [32 (link)]. Quantile normalization and robust multiarray analysis background correction were used for normalization of fluorescence intensity. An analysis of variance was performed to identify differentially expressed genes using the commercial software package SAS JMP Genomics, V. 7 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance was a 0.05 false positive rate with false discovery rate correction (GEO accession number: GSE161649).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Transcriptome Profiling of lncRNA and mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LncRNA and mRNA expression profiling was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST array (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocols. Intensities of target hybridization to respective probe features were detected by laser scanning of the array. First, quantile normalization of the microarray data of the 3 untreated and 3 CRYBB2 KO mice was performed. The data was then log2-scale transformed. Hierarchical clustering of the lncRNA and mRNA profiles was performed using Cluster 3.0 software (http://bonsai.hgc.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/software.htm) (25 (link)). The normalized expression values of the lncRNAs and mRNAs were centered on the median before unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed. Clustering was performed with complete linkage and centered Pearson correlation. To estimate the accuracy of the measurements, the coefficient of variance for each measured parameter was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole-Transcriptome Analysis of Mouse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-transcriptome analysis was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST array (no. 902463) and GeneChip WT Pico kit (no. 902623) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The raw data were summarized and normalized using the Robust Multi-Average method in Affymetrix Power Tools, followed by differential expression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using an independent t test and fold change. The null hypothesis was that no difference exists between the groups. The false-discovery rate was controlled by adjusting the P value using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm. Gene enrichment and functional annotation analysis for the significant probe list were performed using GO (http://geneontology.org). All data analyses and visualization were performed in R 3.3.2 (www.r-project.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptional Profiling of Male PGCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PGCs from E13.5 male embryos were sorted by flow cytometry and used for Affymetrix microarray analysis. Three individual samples of 10 000 PGCs (pooled from at least five embryos for each sample) were processed for WT and KO genotypes. PGCs were directly sorted by flow cytometry in lysis buffer from the RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen, Cortaboeuf, France). The quantity and quality of RNA were analyzed using a 21 000 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France). Only samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) equal to or above 7 were used for the transcriptomic analysis. RNA samples were then analyzed using an Affymetrix GeneChip™ Mouse gene 2.0 ST Array (Thermofisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette, France). Our data were then studied with GSEA and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. For quantitative RT-PCR, mRNA was prepared using RNeasy® Micro and Mini kits (Qiagen, Cortaboeuf, France). The mRNA was then reverse-transcribed with a Quantitect kit (Qiagen, Cortaboeuf, France). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using an AB7900 device (Applied Biosystems, Thermofisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette, France) with Fast SYBR® Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Thermofisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette, France). The primers are listed in Supplementary Material, Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic Analysis on Affymetrix Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA samples were analyzed using an Affymetrix Human Gene 2.1 ST Array and an Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Isolation and Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following treatment, RNA was isolated from primary chondrocytes using TRIzol™ (Invitrogen) as per manufacturer's instructions and as previously described [19 (link)]. In brief, cell homogenization with TRIzol™ was followed by the addition of chloroform for phase separation and the upper aqueous phase was removed. RNA was precipitated using 100% isopropanol and washed with 70% ethanol. RNA was allowed to air-dry prior to resuspension in RNAse-free water, then quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA integrity was determined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and samples with RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 8 were used for microarray analyses at the London Regional Genomics Centre, Robarts Institute (London, ON, Canada).
Total RNA (200 ng/uL per sample) from three independent cell culture experiments per treatment underwent 2 rounds of amplifications, then labeling and hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChip™ Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Array (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing probe sets representing > 28,000 coding transcripts, as previously described [19 (link)]. The complete microarray data set will be deposited at the publicly accessible Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and NCBI accession number provided.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!