The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti elk1

1

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of ELK1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for Western blots were collected, prepared, and analyzed as described previously [31 (link),32 (link)]. Briefly, 661W cells were harvested and lysed in a Tris lysis buffer (in mM): 50 Tris, 1 EGTA, 150 NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% β-mercaptoethanol, 50 NaF, and 1 Na3VO4, pH 7.5. Samples were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in 3% BSA in tris buffered saline Tween 20 (TBST) at room temperature for 1 h and incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated in anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked secondary antibody (1:1000, #7074S, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. The blots were visualized using Super Signal West Pico/Femto chemiluminescent substrate (#34078/#34096, ThemoFisher). Band intensities were quantified using Image J (National Institutes of Health; NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). The primary antibodies used in this study were anti-ELK1 (1:500, #9182S, Cell Signaling) and anti-β-actin (1:2000, #8457L, Cell Signaling). The band intensities of ELK1 were normalized to those of β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Modulating MDM4 and p53 Acetylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-MDM4 antibodies were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. Anti-MDM2 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems. Anti–acetylated p53, anti-p53, anti–phospho ELK1, anti-ELK1, and anti–lamin B antibodies were from Cell Signaling. Anti-αSMA antibody was from American Research Products. Anti-Fas (CH11), anti-DD1α, anti-CD68, and anti–collagen I antibodies were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti-AGE antibody was from Abcam. Anti-fibronectin and anti-GAPDH antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. CXCL10 neutralizing antibody was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. CX3CL1 neutralizing antibody was from R&D Systems. The activities of commercial CXCL10 and CX3CL1 neutralizing antibodies were verified by functional blocking of cell chemotaxis. C646 and tamoxifen were from Sigma. CA was from MedChem Express. Validated MDM4 siRNAs were from OriGene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for Western blots were collected, prepared and analysed as described previously.38 Briefly, 661W cells were harvested and lysed in a Tris lysis buffer (in mM): 50 Tris, 1 EGTA, 150 NaCl, 1% Triton X‐100, 1% β‐mercaptoethanol, 50 NaF, and 1 Na3VO4, pH 7.5. Samples were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in 3% BSA in Tris‐buffered saline, Tween 20 (TBST) at room temperature for 1 h and incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated in anti‐rabbit IgG HRP‐linked secondary antibody (1:1000, #7074S, Cell Signaling) at room temperature for 1 h. The blots were visualized using Super Signal West Pico/Femto chemiluminescent substrate (#34078 / #34096, ThemoFisher). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ (NIH). The primary antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti‐ELK1 (1:500, #9182S, Cell Signaling), anti‐phospho NFĸB P65 (1:1000, #3033, Cell Signaling), anti‐NFĸB P65 (1:1000, #8242S, Cell Signaling) and anti‐β‐actin (1:2000, #8457L, Cell Signaling). The band intensities of ELK1 were normalized to those of β‐actin. The band intensities of phosphorylated NFĸB P65 (pP65) were normalized to those of total NFĸB P65 (P65) and β‐actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Validation for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse monoclonal anti-hemagglutinin (HA) and rabbit polyclonals anti-RhoGDI, anti-HRAS, anti-panRAS, anti-PEA15, anti-RSK1 anti–p-ERK, and anti-ERK2 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA. Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-RSK-1, anti-ELK1, and anti-p-ELK1 were from Cell Signaling, Billerica, MA. Rabbit polyclonal anti-caveolin and anti–lamin A were from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA. Mouse monoclonal anti–transferrin receptor was from Zymed Laboratories, Waltham, MA. Rabbit polyclonal anti-calreticulin was from Calbiochem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated with RIPA buffer (#P0013, Beyotime, China) and quantified with a BCA kit (#P0009, Beyotime, China). Each sample (50 μg) was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, which was then blocked with 5% BSA and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then rinsed 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) and incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Then, membranes were washed with PBST 3 times. Signals were generated with Enhanced Chemiluminescence Substrate (#NEL105001 EA, PerkinElmer) for 1 min before detection with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP System (170-8280). The primary antibodies included anti-Ap-2α (#3215, Cell Signaling; the dilution ratio was 1:1000), anti-Elk-1 (#9182, Cell Signaling; the dilution ratio was 1:1000), anti-Sirpα (#13379, Cell Signaling; the dilution ratio was 1:1000) and anti-GAPDH (#5174, Cell Signaling; the dilution ratio was 1:2000) antibodies. Images were cropped for presentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!