The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xl30 esem feg environmental scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Philips

The XL30 ESEM-FEG is an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope manufactured by Philips. It is designed to observe samples in their natural state without the need for extensive sample preparation. The XL30 ESEM-FEG utilizes a field emission gun (FEG) as the source of electrons, providing high resolution imaging capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using xl30 esem feg environmental scanning electron microscope

1

Characterizing Nanoparticle Formulations by DLS and Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrodynamic size, polydispersity index (PDI) and the zeta potential of TAC-NMF and placebo NMF were determined by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Zetasizer, Westborough, MA, USA. For this, 700 µL of TAC-NMF or placebo NMF were placed in a glass cuvette in the DLS instrument (Malvern Zetasizer, Westborough, MA, USA). Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to access the morphology of TAC-NMF. TAC-NMF in solution state was analyzed by TEM while lyophilized TAC-NMF was analyzed by SEM. Philips CM12 Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope was employed for SEM imaging and Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope instrument was used for SEM imaging. TEM analysis of TAC-NMF was performed by placing 50 μL of TAC-NMF on a carbon-coated copper grid. Followed by negatively staining the sample by phosphotungstic acid. For SEM imaging, For the SEM analysis, lyophilized TAC-NMF was treated as a non-conductive wet sample and imagining was taken in the “wet” mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms were prepared for scanning electron microscopy using a previously published protocol34 (link) with modifications. Single- and dual-species biofilms were grown on cell culture-treated plastic coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 24-well plates for 24 h, after which the MHB medium was replaced with MHB with or without 5 mg/L meropenem. At 48 h, coverslips were washed twice with PBS and samples fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h, at 4°C. Samples were dehydrated using increasing ethanol concentrations (50%, 70%, 90% and 100%) twice for 15 min each. Ethanol was replaced with liquid CO2 and heated up to the critical point to dry the samples. Each coverslip was mounted on a stub and sputter-coated with platinum. Scanning electron microscopy images were captured using a Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG environmental scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Ni(II) Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of the Ni(II) solutions were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (The ATI Unicam 701-Emission Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectrophotometer, USA) and a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Cary 100 UV-Vis, Agilent Technologies, USA) by applying the Dimethylglyoxime method.[28] Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded with a Varian 800 FTIR spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were performed on a Philips XL30 ESEM FEG environmental scanning electron microscope, Netherland. A zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, Instruments Ltd., UK) was used for zeta potential measurements using the setting for a polystyrene standard. Size of the samples was estimated by TEM from Philips CM-100, Netherlands with tungsten filament.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!