The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti cd3 sp7

1

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for flow cytometry staining: Foxp3 (FJK-16s), CD25 (PC61.5), IL-17A (eBio17B7), TCRβ (H57-597), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD11b (M1/70), CD44 (IM7), CD103 (2E7), CD69 (H1.2F3), all from eBioscience; CD4 (GK1.5), CD8α (53-6-7), CD11c (HL3), CTLA4 (UC10-4F10-11) all from BD Biosciences; CD45 (30-F11), Ly6C (HK1.4), IFNγ (XMG1.2) all from BioLegend; Nrp-1 (BAF566) from R&D. For immunohistochemistry, anti-CD3 (SP7) was purchased from Abcam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Phospho-p38

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections (4 µm) were analyzed using the avidin–biotin complex method (EnVision; Dako). Prior to incubation with primary antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-CD3 [SP7; Abcam], rabbit polyclonal anti-T180/Y182 phospho-p38 [Cell Signaling Technology], or rabbit anti-pY323 p38 [ECM Biosciences]), antigen retrieval by heat pretreatment using citrate buffer (pH 6.1) was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cell Profiling in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors grown in C57BL/6 mice were harvested 7 days following treatment, zinc-fixed, sectioned and prepared as previously described [43 (link)]. Primary antibodies were anti-CD3 (SP7, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-CD8α (4SM15, eBioscience), anti-FoxP3 (FJK-16s, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), anti-PD-L1 (D5V3B, Cell-Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and DAPI (Perkin Elmer). Anti-Rat HRP (mouse adsorbed) or Anti-Rabbit HRP secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories) were used prior to tyramide staining with Opal 7-Color Automation IHC Kit (690 for CD3, 570 for PD-L1, 620 for CD8α, and 520 for FoxP3). Slides were scanned with Vectra Polaris (Perkin Elmer) and analyzed using QuPath 0.2.0-m4 [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Analysis of Mouse Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mouse livers were fixed with 10% formalin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H-E). Ki67, CD3, F4/80, and Gr-1 immunostaining was performed using anti-Ki67 (SP6, NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), anti-CD3 (SP7, Abcam, Cambridge UK), anti-F4/80 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), or Gr-1 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) Abs, respectively, and a VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit. Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) was used as the peroxidase substrate and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The positive immunostained area was analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda, MD, USA; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) and the percentage of positive-stained tissue relative to the total area of the tissue section was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Multiplex Immunohistochemistry of Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors grown in C57BL/6 and C3H mice were harvested upon reaching 12 mm in diameter and were fixed in zinc-based fixative for 24 hours at room temperature as previously described (16 (link)). Tissue was then processed by preparing 4 µm thick tissue sections, incubation of slides at 37°C and deparaffinization. The protocol included blocking with goat serum (Vector) prior to staining and dilution of primary antibodies in Renaissance Background reducing Diluent (Biocare medical). Tissue sections were boiled in Rodent Decloaker (Biocare Medical) for antigen retrieval, except prior to CD8 staining where pH=9 buffer (Perkin Elmer) was used. Primary antibodies were anti-CD3 (SP7, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-CD8α (4SM15, eBioscience), anti-FoxP3 (FJK-16s, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), anti-PD-L1 (D5V3B, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and DAPI (Perkin Elmer). Opal 7-Color Automation IHC Kit was used (690 for CD3, 570 for PD-L1, 620 for CD8α, and 520 for FoxP3). Slides were scanned with Vectra Polaris (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) and analyzed using QuPath 0.2.0-m4 (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for flow cytometry staining: Foxp3 (FJK-16s), CD25 (PC61.5), IL-17A (eBio17B7), TCRβ (H57-597), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD11b (M1/70), CD44 (IM7), CD103 (2E7), CD69 (H1.2F3), all from eBioscience; CD4 (GK1.5), CD8α (53-6-7), CD11c (HL3), CTLA4 (UC10-4F10-11) all from BD Biosciences; CD45 (30-F11), Ly6C (HK1.4), IFNγ (XMG1.2) all from BioLegend; Nrp-1 (BAF566) from R&D. For immunohistochemistry, anti-CD3 (SP7) was purchased from Abcam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TILs were assessed using H and E slides in FFPE sections obtained through core needle biopsies prior to therapy and through surgical specimens after treatment at surgery. Separate individual slides were stained with anti-CD56 (123C3.D5 + 123A8, Abcam plc, Cambridge, MA), anti-CD3 (SP7, Abcam plc), anti-CD8 (SP16, Abcam plc), anti-FoxP3 (1054C, R and D systems), and anti-CD68 (KP1, Abcam plc) antibodies. All slides were prepared and stained by the UAMS pathology core. The percentage of TILs was determined according to the method proposed by the International Immuno-Oncology Working Group [31 (link), 32 (link)]. The same strategy was used to score various lymphocytes including CD56- and CD3-positive TILs. Slides were independently evaluated by two pathologists (SPO and GRP). Images were analyzed using a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope at 20X magnification. Photomicrographs were taken with a Nikon DS-Fi3 microscope camera using the NIS-Elements D software from Nikon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!