Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The proportions of LPR-associated versus non-associated symptoms or findings were compared between groups (patient prevalence versus OTO-HNS-attributed prevalence) with the χ2 test. A p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Statistical package for the social sciences for windows spss version 22 0
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 22.0 for Windows is a comprehensive software suite for statistical analysis. It provides a range of advanced analytical tools and techniques for researchers and professionals working in various fields, including social sciences, behavioral sciences, and market research. The software enables users to perform a wide variety of statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, factor analysis, and more. SPSS offers a user-friendly interface and a powerful set of features designed to facilitate data management, analysis, and reporting.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
5 protocols using statistical package for the social sciences for windows spss version 22 0
1
Comparison of LPR-Associated Symptoms
2
Olfactory Dysfunction Correlates
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between clinical and olfactory outcomes was analyzed through non-parametric test using Spearman correlation for scale data. We investigated all potential associations between nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, endoscopy and radiology scores and the occurrence of olfactory disorder (Sniffin' Sticks test). A level of significance of p<0.05 was used.
3
Olfactory Outcomes and Nasal Complaints
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between clinical and olfactory outcomes was analyzed through non-parametric test using Spearman correlation for scale data, Khi2 test for ordinal data and Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorized data. We investigated all potential associations between nasal complaints (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip) and the occurrence of olfactory disorder (sni inʼstick test). A level of significance of p<0.05 was used.
4
Olfactory Dysfunction and Viral Load
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between CT (inversely reflecting viral load) and the duration of olfactory dysfunction was assessed by Spearman rho test. A level of significance of p<0.05 was used.
5
Association of Nasal Symptoms and Olfactory Function
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS version 22,0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between clinical and olfactory outcomes was analyzed through non-parametric test using Spearman correlation for scale data, Khi2 test for ordinal data and Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorized data. We investigated all potential associations between nasal complaints (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip) and the occurrence of olfactory disorder (sniffin'stick test). A level of significance of p<0.05 was used.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!