The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pcr topo 2 vector

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The PCR Topo II vector is a plasmid used for the cloning of PCR products. It provides a simple and efficient method for the direct insertion of Taq polymerase-amplified PCR products into a vector. The vector contains Topoisomerase I-activated linearized DNA, which allows for the direct ligation of PCR products without the need for restriction enzyme digestion or ligase.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using pcr topo 2 vector

1

Zebrafish PDE6 Inhibitory Subunit Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to study the expression pattern of the four zebrafish PDE6 inhibitory subunit genes (pde6ga, pde6gb, pde6ha and pde6hb), antisense riboprobes were designed targeting their 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTR). PCR primers were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool [72 (link)], available at the NCBI webpage (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (see Table 3) and PCR reactions were performed using genomic DNA from zebrafish. The resulting amplicons were cloned into pCR®II-TOPO® vectors (Invitrogen: cat. no. K4650-01), sequenced and used for probe synthesis with either T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase using DIG RNA labelling kit (Roche: cat. no. 11175025910) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Sense and antisense probes were synthesised and the former was used to control for specificity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In situ Hybridization of Nrg1, ErbB2 and ErbB3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4 °C, embedded in paraffin and hybridizations were carried out essentially as described in (Chassot et al., 2008) . Nrg1 digoxigenin-labelled riboprobe was synthetized using 576 bp matching sequence (Fig. 1E). ErbB2 riboprobe was generated by PCR amplification of gonadal cDNA using the FErbB2: 5′-tggtccagcctgagccatgg-3′ and RErbB2: 5′-acttgtccaaagggtctcg-3′ primers and cloning in the pCR ® II-TOPO ® vectors (Invitrogen life technologies). ErbB3 riboprobe was kindly provided by Michael Wegner. Post-hybridization washes were performed in 100 mM maleic acid pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) tween-20 (MABT). Imaging was performed using a MZ9.5 (Leica) microscope coupled with a DHC490 (Leica) camera and application suite V3.3.0 (Leica) software and processed with Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Sequencing of DNA Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR products were purified using the Gel Band Purification kit (Amersham, USA), followed by Sepharose CL-6B affinity chromatography (Pharmacia Corp., NYC, NY, USA), and then cloned into a pCR Ò II-TOPO Ò vector (Invitrogen, USA). After transformation of E. coli cells, positive clones were screened by using agar plates containing ampicillin (50 ll/ml), X-Gal (40 mg/ml) and IPTG (40 ll of 100 mM IPTG -Isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside solution). Plasmids were extracted using the SDS plasmid isolation protocol (Sambrook et al. 1990) . In order to confirm the presence of the expected cloned fragment, plasmid DNA clones were digested before sequencing by the EcoRI restriction enzyme and visualized on agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning and Sequencing of DNA Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR products were purified using the Gel Band Purification kit (Amersham, USA), followed by Sepharose CL-6B affinity chromatography (Pharmacia Corp., NYC, NY, USA), and then cloned into a pCR Ò II-TOPO Ò vector (Invitrogen, USA). After transformation of E. coli cells, positive clones were screened by using agar plates containing ampicillin (50 ll/ml), X-Gal (40 mg/ml) and IPTG (40 ll of 100 mM IPTG -Isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside solution). Plasmids were extracted using the SDS plasmid isolation protocol (Sambrook et al. 1990) . In order to confirm the presence of the expected cloned fragment, plasmid DNA clones were digested before sequencing by the EcoRI restriction enzyme and visualized on agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

KSHV Viral Load Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KSHV viral load was quantified using real-time PCR. KSHV DNA was detected using primers (K6 forward primer K6-10F 5′-CGCCTAATAGCTGCTGCTACGG-3′, K6 reverse primer K6-10R 5′-TGCATCAGCTGCCTAACCCAG-3′) and a probe (K6 probe p-K6-10 5′-R-CACCCACCGCCCGTCCAAATTC-Q-3′) previously reported to be specific to the K6 gene region [25 (link)]. Additionally, the number of cellular equivalents were determined using a quantitative assay specific to human endogenous retrovirus 3 (ERV-3), which is present in two copies per genomic cell, using these primers (ERV-3 Forward primer PHP10-F 5′-CATGGGAAGCAAGGGAACTAATG′ ERV-3 Reverse primer PHP10-R 5′-CCCAGCGAGCAATACAGAATTT-3′) and a probe (ERV-3 Probe PHP-P505 5′-R-TCTTCCCTCGAACCTGCACCATCAAGTCA-Q-3′). To quantify both ERV-3 and KSHV DNA, seven two-fold serial dilutions of K6 and ERV-3 were made from clone stocks (starting with 1 × 106 dilution to 1 × 100) to form a standard curve on every plate. ERV-3 was cloned into Bluescript II KS vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) KSHV K6 cloned using PCR Topo II vector, Topo TA Cloning kit, Invitrogen, K 4600-40. This procedure has been reported elsewhere [10 (link), 26 (link), 27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of Inducible Rag1/Rag2 Mouse Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to generate a mouse line in which Rag1 and Rag2 expression could be induced from the Rosa26 locus by removal of the STOP cassette upon Cre expression, we used 2A peptides79 (link) for bicistronic expression. We amplified the mouse Rag2 coding region from genomic DNA by PCR reaction with primers (Rag2-5′ and Rag2-2A-3′) which allowed us to add 2A peptide sequences after the stop codon for Rag2 translation. We also amplified Rag1 cDNA by PCR. These PCR products were cloned into the pCR-TOPOII vector (Invitrogen), and their sequences verified. We then inserted the Rag2-2A fragment in front of the Rag1 cDNA fragment in pCR-TOPOII, followed by preparation of an entire Rag2-2A-Rag1 fragment by NotI digestion and a ligation into the NotI site of the pCTV vector (Addgene) (Supp Fig. 2a). The linearized targeting vector was transfected into M1 embryonic stem (ES) cells by electroporation. After G418 selection, ES clones that underwent homologous recombination were screened by PCR as previously described80 (link). Primers: Rag2-5′ (5′- CGGCGCGCC AGCATAATTACCAATATGAAAAGATATTC-3′), Rag2-2A-3′ (5′- CGGATCCCCTGGGCCAGGATTCTCCTCGACGTCACCGCATGTTAGCAGACTTCCTCTGCCCTCTCCACTGCCATCAAACAGTCTTCTAAGGAAGGATTTC-3′), Rag1-5′ (5′-GGATCCTATGGCTGCCTCCTTGCCGTCTACCCTGAGC-3′) and Rag1-3′ (5′- CGGCGCGCCATGTGGAGATCCTATTTAAAACTCCATTGA -3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of VGLUT2 Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VGLUT2 probes used in this study were digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes obtained by in vitro transcription of a rat VGLUT2 cDNA (Gift from Dr S. El Mestikawy). This cDNA (539 bp) was inserted into the pCR-TOPO-II vector (Invitrogen) for in vitro transcription. The transcription was carried out with the nonradioactive RNA labeling kit (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France). The recombinant plasmid containing the VGLUT2 cDNA insert was linearized with Xho I and transcribed with Sp6 RNA polymerase to obtain the antisense probe or linearized with Hind III and transcribed with T7 to obtain the sense probe. The labeling efficiency of the digoxigenin-labeled probes for VGLUT2 mRNA was determined each time by direct immunological detection on dot blots with a nucleic acid detection kit (Roche Diagnostics). The intensity of the signal for each probe was compared with a serial dilution of digoxigenin-labeled control RNA of known concentration. Only antisense and sense VGLUT2 probes with comparable signal intensity (comparable labeling efficiency), as determined in dot blots, were used for in situ hybridization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!