The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

77 protocols using li 6400xt portable photosynthesis system

1

Non-Photochemical Quenching Induction and Relaxation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) induction and relaxation was measured using the LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaves from 12-week-old plants grown under greenhouse conditions were dark-adapted overnight by wrapping leaves completely in aluminum foil. The flag leaf of the primary tiller was used for measurement whenever possible. Flag leaves of other tillers were also used if the flag leaf of the primary tiller was beginning to senesce or was otherwise unsuitable. Between 4 and 6 biological replicates were measured for each genotype. Dark-adapted leaves were clamped into the fluorometer chamber and allowed for a further dark adaptation of 5 min prior to measurement. The leaves were exposed to an actinic light intensity of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 for 6 min. After illumination for 6 min, actinic light was turned off for another 6 min to observe NPQ relaxation. NPQ was measured with a saturating pulse every 30 s in both the illuminated and dark state. The maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was determined with the first saturating pulse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Photosynthesis Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-month-old plants were grown in 18-cm diameter pots containing Fafard 3B soil mix (Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA) in 12 h of light (250 μmol m–2 s–1), 25 °C, 60% humidity, and 12 h of dark, 18 °C, 70% humidity in a walk-in controlled-environment chamber (Conviron model BDW80, Winnipeg, Canada). Leaf pair 6 (LP6; counting from the top of the plants) was used for gas exchange analysis. The gas exchange measurements were performed at a CO2 concentration of 400 μmol mol–1, 60 % relative humidity, 500 μmol s–1 air flow, and a photon flux density of 250 μmol m–2 s–1 using a LI-6400-XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The leaf was continuously clamped into the leaf cuvette. All experiments were repeated at least three times using intact LP6 (Supplementary Fig. S1) from three separate clonal plants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stomatal Aperture and Water Loss Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One month old tissue culture samples of WT and OE tobacco leaves under control conditions were sampled and 200 mM mannitol was used to remove the epidermis. The stomatal apertures were observed and photographed using an optical microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Three measurements were taken for each sample. To determine the water loss rate of plants, 8-week-old WT and OE transgenic plants were cut and weighed immediately (fresh weight, FW) and then dried naturally. Weights of the drying leaves (DW) were taken every 10 min and water loss was calculated using the formula (FW–DW) / FW. The photosynthetic rate was measured using the Li-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (Li-COR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Flag Leaf Photosynthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the heading stage, LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE USA) was used to measure Pn of the flag leaves in the early, middle, and late seasons in 2017. The photosynthetically active radiation was controlled at 1200 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by a 6400-2B LED light source. Six representative flag leaves from each plot were measured and recorded, and the mean values were calculated for Pn.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Plant Stress Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrated and dehydrated tissues were collected at certain intervals and their fresh weights (FWs) were measured immediately. The DW was measured after drying for at least 48 h in a 65 °C oven. Water content (WC) was calculated using the formula WC = (FW − DW)/DW. At least five biological replicates were included for each time point.
Electrolyte leakage and MDA contents were examined to assess membrane stability, soluble sugars and proline contents were determined to evaluate cellular structure protection, and GSH, POD and SOD activities were determined to quantify antioxidant capacity (ROS elimination). Electrolyte leakage was measured using a DDBJ-350 electrical conductivity meter (INESA Scientific Instruments Co., Shanghai, China). The contents of MDA, soluble sugars, and proline, and the activities of GSH, POD, and SOD were measured using antioxidant detection kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Photosynthesis and respiration rates were detected using a LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured using a IMAGING-PAM M-series chlorophyll fluorometer (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Leaf Photosynthetic Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf chlorophyll content was measured from the recently expanded leaves of the CK and GT-KD seedlings grew at 12 or 15 DAG, with a SPAD meter (SPAD-502 Plus, Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) under a saturating actinic light (660 nm) with an intensity of 1,100 μmol m−2s−1. The middle widest part of the recently expanded leaf of every seedling, that is the second leaf of the 12 DAG seedlings and the third leaf of the 15 DAG seedlings, was used for the SPAD value measurement. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and transpiration rate (TR) were measured from the latest expanded leaf (the third leaf) of the 15 DAG seedlings (with three leaves and a heart leaf) with a portable LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), recorded at a saturating actinic light (660 nm) with an intensity of 1,100 μmol m−2s−1, at the time from 09:00 to 12:00 in the morning. All the measurements were conducted on the middle part of the latest expanded leaves following the instructions of the manufacturer. Five replicates were randomly taken for each genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Leaf Succulence and Water Relations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf succulence on a dry weight basis was measured using the equation: Succulence(gH2Og1DW)=(FWDW)DW
Relative water content (RWC) was found out with the help of the formula: RWC(%)=(FWDW)(TWDW)×100
where FW is the fresh weight; DW the dry weight and TW the turgid weight of leaves after rehydration in distilled water for 24 h at room temperature (∼25 °C).
Leaf osmotic potential was calculated using van't Hoff equation (Kramer and Boyer 1995 ) on osmolality of expressed leaf sap measured by a vapour pressure osmometer (VAPRO-5520; Wescor Inc., Logan, UT, USA) (Gucci et al. 1991 ). Xylem pressure potential (XPP) was measured on excised stems with a plant water status console Model 1000 (PMS Instrument Co., Albany, NY, USA). Instantaneous WUE was calculated from the rate of CO2 fixation (A) which was measured using a Li-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (LICOR Biosciences) per amount of water transpired (E) from the leaf surface as WUE(μmolCO2mmol1H2O)=AE
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Photosynthetic Leaf Pigment and Gas Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 0.1 g of leaves were digested in 5 mL alcohol (95%, v/v) overnight at 4 °C, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm (Centrifuge 5425/5425 R; Eppendorf, Germany) for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was stored at 4 °C for Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b, and Chl a/b ratio measurements [46 (link)]. Leaf photosynthetic parameters were measured between 10:30 and 11:30 AM using an LI-6400 XT portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The Pn, Ci, Gs, and Tr were measured in a chamber at 1,500 μM m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 380 ± 5 μM CO2 M−1 [15 ]. The WUE and Rubisco activity [47 (link)] were estimated as follows:

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Photosynthesis and Plant Growth Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each line, all phenotypic traits were evaluated using five representative leading tillers. Plant height and its component traits, including spike length, internode number, and the length of the first internode to the sixth internode from the top, were measured during harvest.
Five photosynthesis traits, chlorophyll content, the net photosynthetic rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, the transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance, were investigated at both the seedling and heading stages. The chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD-502 Plus chlorophyll meter (Minolta, Osaka, Japan), and the other four photosynthesis traits were estimated using an LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis system (LI-COR, Lincoln, USA). Data from two consecutive years (E1 of 2015–2016 and E2 of 2016–2017) were combined and then used as phenotypic traits in E3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Stomatal Conductance Dynamics in Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves from two weeks wild-type plants and two sapk3 mutant lines were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and observed by scanning electron microscopy (S-3400 N, Hitachi, Japan). The second leaves of two weeks rice plants were selected for the stomatal conductance analysis, which was performed using the LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR, USA) before and after 7 days exposure to drought stress.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!