The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer

1

Characterization of AuNPs-PEI Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The absorption spectra of AuNPs, PEI and AuNPs–PEI were performed on a Cary Series UV–vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany)was used to perform Fourier-transform infrared spectra of AuNPs, PEI and AuNPs–PEI (resolution: better than 0.25 cm−1; signal-to-noise ratio: better than 50,000:1; spectral area: 8000~350 cm−1 (basic), 15,500~20 cm−1 (optional); accuracy: 0.005 cm−1). The excitation and emission spectra were acquired on a Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies Inc. USA) (resolution: 1.5 nm; the wavelength range: 200–900 nm) with a slit width of 5 nm. The morphology of AuNPs–PEI was featured using a JEOL JEM–200CX transmission electron microscope (TEM) operating at 200 KV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) was used to measure the average size of AuNPs, AuNPs–PEI and AuNPs–PEI/FLPs sensor by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Zeta potential was tested on a Zeta sizer (Nano–Z, Malvern, UK). The fluorescence intensity was obtained on Varioskan Flash (Thermo Scientific, USA) HE staining images were obtained using NanoZoomer 2.0 RS (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu city, Japan) in a digital pathology slice scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soil Physicochemical Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil BD was calculated based on the inner diameter of the core sampler, the sampling depth and the oven–dried weight of the composite soil samples (Jia et al., 2005 (link)). Soil pH was measured in distilled water mixed 5:1 (by mass) with dry soil using a Delta 320 pH meter (Mettler–Toledo Instruments (Shanghai) Ltd, Shanghai, China) equipped with a calibrated combined glass electrode. SOC and litter carbon content were assayed by dichromate oxidation (Kalembasa & Jenkinson, 1973 (link)), and STN concentration was assayed using the Kjeldahl method (Jackson, 1973 ). A laser particle analyzer operating over a range of 0.02–2,000 μm (Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer, Malvern Instruments, Ltd., Malvern, UK), based on the laser diffraction technique, was used to measure particle size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Droplet Size Characterization of Swietenia Oil Emulsion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe the size and distribution of the droplets, a 250 μL sample of Swietenia oil and surfactant mixture was self-emulsified in 300 mL of distilled water. The mixture was gently agitated with a glass rod. The size and size distribution of the droplets were examined using a Mastersizer 2,000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) for the resulting emulsion. Size and distribution measurements were taken in triplicate. This step was part of the screening study of the ternary phase diagram. A Malvern Zetasizer Nano was used to perform a zeta potential analysis on formulations with droplets that were smaller than 200 nm.32
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Soil Characterization Protocol for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main properties of the soil are summarized in Table 1. The soil density (ρb) was measured from soil dry weight/isometric water weight, and the porosity was calculated as (1-ρb/2.65) × 100% [15 ]. The pH was determined in a mixture with distilled water to soil mixture of 5:1 (v/w) [5 (link)]. The soluble salt content was extracted as described in a previous report [16 (link)]. In brief, 10 g of soil was mixed with 50 mL of CO2-free water and shaken 3 min. 20 mL of supernatant was evaporated at 105 °C and then H2O2 (10% of mass fraction) was used to remove organic matter. In order to make a comparison with EC measured using the conventional method, ECs of soil were evaluated with soil to distilled water ratios (v/w) of 1:2.5, 1:5 and 1:10 using a EC meter (SFENGCI, DDS-11A, Shanghai, China) [3 (link),4 (link)]. The soil particle size distribution was obtained by using Mastersizer2000particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Silica Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were degassed at 393 K for 1 h to obtain a residual pressure of less than 10−3 Torr. The amount of N2 adsorbed at a relative pressure of P/P0 = 0.99 was used to determine the total pore volume. The morphology of bare and ligand bonded silica particles was examined with scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The dried samples (bare silica and ligand bonded silica particles) were put on aluminum stubs using adhesive carbon tape. A Q150T sputter coater was used to coat gold over the sample and 5 nm Au layer was deposited over the sample. This enhances the efficiency of the process using low voltages and giving a fine-grain, cool sputtering. A Thermo Electron (Waltham, MA, USA) Flash EA1112 elemental analyzer was used to carry out elemental analysis. A Malvern (Worcestershire, UK) Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer was used to get particle size distribution. Bare silica particles and ligand bonded silica particles (5 mg each) were dispersed in 5 mL isopropyl alcohol, sonicate for 10 min, vortexes for 5 min, and subjected to the optical bench of Mastersizer. Thermo gravimetric analysis were carried out over a temperature range of 30 to 800 °C at 5 °C per minute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Particle Size Analysis of Film-Forming Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size analysis of the film-forming solutions as a granulometric distribution of solid particles in water was performed in three repetitions using a Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Characteristic parameters of the distribution, such as DV10, DV50, and DV90 diameters corresponding to 10%, 50,% and 90%, respectively, of the volume (mass) of the set of particles were determined. The equivalent diameters D3.2 and D4.3 were calculated according to the equations: D3.2=d3d2
D4.3=d4d3
where d—diameter of a single solid particle, (µm).
Equivalent diameter D3.2 defines the diameter of a sphere equivalent in area, whereas equivalent diameter D4.3 defines the diameter of a sphere equivalent in volume or mass.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hydrophobic Silica Powder Blending

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 1

A Kepstan® 6003 PL powder from the company Arkema, containing 60% of terephthalic units relative to the sum of the terephthalic and isophthalic units, whose particle size has a Dv50 of 50 μm plus or minus 5 μm, was supplemented with 0.4% of Cab-O-Sil® TS-610 silica in a Magimix kitchen blender at high speed for 100 seconds.

The Dv50 is also known as the volume median diameter, which corresponds to the particle size value which divides the population of particles examined exactly into two. The Dv50 is measured according to standard ISO 9276—parts 1 to 6. In the present description, a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer is used, and the measurement is taken in the liquid route by laser diffraction on the powder.

The silica Cab-O-Sil® TS-610 is a fumed silica that has been made hydrophobic by treatment with dimethylchlorosilane. It will be referred to hereinbelow as “TS-610”.

The powder has excellent flowability (time <10 s, 0 taps for a 17 mm funnel), but the coalescence, estimated as described above, is very poor, the steel plate still being clearly visible.

The silica may thus be an anti-coalescer at a high content.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Soil Characteristics Evaluation in Yili River Valley

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We chose representative samples in the Yili River Valley in May 2015, associated with regional DEM, land use types, climate, soil and other natural conditions. The self-made sampler (10 cm diameter and 50 cm height) was used to collect topsoil samples (0–20 cm). Each sample point was positioned by GPS, and factors such as latitude, longitude and elevation were recorded. One hundred twenty-seven topsoil samples at depths of 0–20 cm were collected (Fig. 1) including cultivated land samples (nine), garden samples (18), woodland samples (12), and grassland samples (88). The organic carbon concentration of the soil (g•kg−1) was determined using the K2Cr2O7-external heating method; total nitrogen concentration (g•kg−1) was determined using the perchloric acid-sulphuric acid digestion method; total phosphorus in the soil was found using the acid-soluble and molybdenum antimony ratio colorimetric method; total potassium in the soil was determined using the acid digestion and flame photometric method; soil pH was determined using the potential method; SBD was determined using the ring shear testing method; water content was determined using oven drying method (Liu et al., 2016 (link)); and the Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, England) was used to measure soil particle composition (Zhang et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ellagic Acid-Loaded SMEDDS with Precipitation Inhibitor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EA-S-SMEDDS was prepared by the previously described method (11) (link). Briefly, the surfactant and co-surfactant (67.5 % Tween 80 and 22.5 % PEG 400) were uniformly mixed with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Then, the oil phase (10 % ethyl oleate) was added into the mixture to prepare a blank SMEDDS. After dissolving precipitation inhibitors (0.5 % PVP K30) into the blank SMEDDS, 4 mg g -1 ellagic acid was mixed by vigorous vortexing until a transparent solution was reached, and then the EA-S-SMEDDS was obtained. Meanwhile, EA-SMEDDS was prepared by the same method without the use of precipitation inhibitors. Additionally, the morphologies of EA-S-SMEDDS and EA-SMEDDS were investigated by the HT7700 transmission electron microscope (TEM, Hitachi, Japan), and the average particle size of the emulsions was measured using the Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). The morphology of emulsified EA-S-SEDDS and EA-SMEDDS presented a round shape and non-aggregated, displaying a narrow particle size distribution with the average size of about 45 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Milk and Cream Fat Globule Sizing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sizes of fat globules in raw and treated milk and cream samples were determined using a Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The system is based on a laser light scattering technique. The laser obscuration rate was maintained between 13.2 and 18.0% and the pump/ stir speed was set at 2,040 rpm. The sample beaker was filled with deionized water for flushing the tank thrice and for laser alignment. Deionized water was also used as the sample dispersant. The refractive indices of milk fat and deionized water are 1.45 and 1.33, respectively. Milk and cream samples were diluted in the ratio of 1:1 using 35 mM EDTA (pH adjusted to 7.0 using NaOH), which chelates calcium and facilitates dissociation of the casein micelles, thus removing the casein micelles from the fat globule membranes. The diluted sample was then dispersed into sample beaker filled with the dispersant for measurement. The diameter of the distribution peak, Sauter diameter (D 3,2 ), and the volume-weighted diameter (D 4,3 ) were determined by the Malvern software. The specific area (S) was calculated from the Sauter diameter [S = 6/(ρ × D 3,2 )], where ρ is the density of milk fat, which is 0.92 (Mulder and Walstra, 1974) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!