The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti mouse f4 80

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The Anti-mouse F4/80 is a mouse monoclonal antibody that recognizes the F4/80 antigen, a 160 kDa glycoprotein that is expressed on the surface of mouse macrophages and microglia. This antibody can be used for the identification and isolation of mouse macrophages and microglia.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using anti mouse f4 80

1

Fluorescent SA-β-gal Labeling and Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the fluorescent SA-β-gal labeling, tissue slides were exposed to the C12RG substrate at 37 °C according to manufacturer’s instructions (ImaGene Red C12RG lacZ Gene Expression Kit, Molecular Probes, I2906)48 (link),49 . Subsequently, for immunofluorescence analysis, slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and regular immunofluorescence was performed following standard protocols and those previously described14 (link). The following antibodies were used: anti-mouse uPAR uPAR (AF534,R&D, DCL0521042; 1:50 dilution) and anti-mouse F4/80 (Bio-Rad, CI:A3-1, 155529; 1:100 dilution). For quantification, five high-power fields per section were counted and averaged to quantify the percentage of SA-β-gal+, uPAR+ and F4/80+ per DAPI-positive cells. For colocalization analysis, Pearson coefficient was calculated using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections of frozen specimens (either human or mouse) were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (anti-human/mouse iNOS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA); Mouse IgG1 Isotype Control (MOPC-21), (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA); Anti-Human CD14 (61D3) and Anti-human CD3 (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA), anti-mouse F4/80 (BioRad, Raleigh, NC), mouse IgG1, rat IgG2b (Biolegend San Diego, CA), anti-human Arg1 and Goat IgG Control (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Dallas, Texas) followed by reaction with Cy3, Cy5, or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342, washed in PBS, and mounted with Antifade Mounting Media (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescent SA-β-gal Labeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the fluorescent SA-β-gal labelling, tissue slides were exposed to the C12RG substrate at 37°C according to manufacturer’s instructions (ImaGene Red C12RG lacZ Gene Expression Kit, Molecular Probes, I2906)48 (link),49 (link). Subsequently, for IF analysis, slides were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 minutes at room temperature and proceed with regular IF as performed following standard protocols and previously described8 (link). The following antibodies were used: anti-mouse uPAR (R&D, AF534, 1:100) and anti-mouse F4/80 (Bio Rad, CI:A3–1). For quantification 5 high power fields per section were counted and averaged to quantify the percentage of SA-β-gal+, uPAR+ and F4/80+ per DAPI positive cells. For co-localization analysis Pearson coefficient was calculated using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin embedded tissues were sectioned and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Frozen sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. For staining of proliferating cells, or macrophage , the sections were incubated with anti-mouse Ki67 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-mouse F4/80 or CD68 rat polyclonal antibody (AbD serotec, Raleigh, NC) at 4°C overnight followed by incubation with corresponding secondary antibody, respectively. TUNEL assay was performed using TUNEL System (Promega Biosciences, LLC, San Luis Obispo, CA USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sections were imaged under laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon Inc.), and the images were analyzed using NIS Elements software. DAPI nuclear stain was used to define the number of cells and the border of the tumor lesions (based on the density of nuclei). Fluorescent images (n=10-12) were captured and processed for regions of interest (ROI) using NIS elements software. To evaluate the macrophage distribution in various regions of the liver, the relative fluorescent intensities of F4/80 cells in ROI inside the tumor, tumor periphery (40-50 μm from the tumor border) and in the unaffected tissue were measured and normalized to DAPI signals (number of cells).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cryosectioned Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were embedded in OCT, frozen on liquid nitrogen, and 7 μm cryostat sections were cut. Specimens were placed on glass slides, air dried and fixed with aceton for 2 min at −20°C. After rehydration with 80% methanol at 4°C, the specimens were washed in PBS and then in PBS with 5% donkey serum and 1% bovine serum albumin, followed by incubation with the respective primary antibodies. Standard H&E and immunofluorescence stainings were performed as described previously [9] (link), [29] (link), using the following antibodies: anti-mouse LYVE-1 (AngioBio), biotin anti-MECA-32 (BD Biosciences), anti-human von Willebrand factor (Dako), anti-mouse podoplanin (clone 8.1.1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa), anti-mouse keratin 6, anti-loricrin (Covance Research Products), anti-BrdU-Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen), anti-mouse F4/80 (AbD Serotec), anti-mouse CD68 (Abcam), anti-mouse CD8 (BD Biosciences) and anti-mouse CXCR4 (R&D Systems). Alexa Fluor488-, Alexa Fluor594- and Alexa Fluor647-coupled secondary antibodies and Hoechst 33342 were purchased from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological Analysis of Kidney Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sacrifice, portions of harvested kidney tissues were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formalin, followed by dehydration in graded alcohols and embedded in paraffin. For further analysis such as periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining or immunostaining 4 μm sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, transferred into citrate buffer, and either autoclaved or microwave treated for antigen retrieval and processed as described [12 (link)]. For immunostaining following primary antibodies were used: Collagen1α1 (Dako, Hamburg, Germany), anti-mouse CD3, anti-mouse F4/80 (both Serotec, Oxford, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Kidney Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed in 1‐μm‐thick paraffin sections of methyl Carnoy's‐fixed specimens using the Vectastain Avidin/Biotin System (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), as described before 25. Renal tissues were stained using the following primary antibodies: anti‐human Col1A1 (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL), anti‐Kim1 (R&D systems, USA), anti‐mouse F4/80 (Serotec, Düsseldorf, Germany), anti‐proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Leinco Technologies, St. Louis, MO) and anti‐Ly6G (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Negative controls for the immunohistochemical procedures consisted of substitution of the primary antibody with non‐immune IgG. Quantification of Ly6G was described before 4. Total number of PCNA‐stained nuclei in renal tubuli was counted in 25 randomly selected fields at ×200 magnification. For staining quantification of collagen and F4/80, 20 consecutive images of renal cortex were taken per section. The percentage of the positively stained area was extracted for intensity using ImageJ software (Wayne Rasband, NIH) and a mean area was calculated. Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining was performed as described before 25, and the tubular injury was scored on a scale of 0–4: 0 = none; 1 = 0–25%; 2 = 25–50%; 3 = 50–75%; 4 = more than 75%. The total score is the calculated average of all tubular scores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Liver Histological Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alanine (ALT) activities (UV test at 37°C) were measured from serum (Roche Modular preanalytics system, Rotkreuz Switzerland). Conventional H&E, Sirius red, and Ladewig staining were performed according to standard protocols [20] (link). Steatosis was scored by an experienced pathologist blinded to experimental data, as previously described [9] (link), [15] (link). Liver sections from fixed paraffin blocks were immunohistochemically stained according to standard procedures using anti-mouse F4/80 and anti-human CD68 (Serotec), respectively [21] (link). CD68 and H&E pictures were analysed by quantifying the area fraction using imaging software in a blinded fashion (ImageJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ID8-luc Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue fixation, processing and sectioning methods of harvested ID8-luc xenografts were performed as previously described [18 (link),23 (link)]. In ID8-luc tumors, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mib-1/Ki67 (1:1000; rabbit polyclonal anti-mib-1/Ki67, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), cleaved caspase-3 (1:300; rabbit polyclonal anti- cleaved caspase-3, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and γH2AX (Ser139) (1:100; mouse monoclonal MilliporeSigma) were performed as previously described [16] (link). Fluorescent-IHC image acquisition and analysis of co-staining for the pan-macrophage marker F4/80 (1:200 rat polyclonal anti-mouse F4/80, AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK), and the M2 macrophage marker arginase-1 (1:200; rabbit polyclonal anti-arginase-1, GeneTex, Irvine, CA), and separately for the cytotoxic T cell marker CD8 (1:100; rat monoclonal anti-mouse CD8, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO), was performed as previously described [23] (link). Cell nuclei were identified by staining with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). At least 1000 cells were counted in at least 5 independent fields under high power (x40) for these counts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation of Mouse and Human Neutrophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated using a modified version of the negative immunomagnetic separation technique described by Cotter et al.44 (link). Peripheral blood was incubated with the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-mouse CD2 (1.5 µg/106 lymphocytes), anti-mouse CD5 (2 µg/106 lymphocytes), anti-mouse CD45R (10 µg/106 lymphocytes) (all from Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK), anti-mouse F4/80 (4 µg/106 monocytes) and anti-mouse CD115 (15 µg/106 monocytes) (both from AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK). Cells were then incubated with goat anti-rat IgG MicroBeads (20 µl/107 cells, Miltenyi Biotec Ltd, Bisley, UK) at 4 °C for 15 min before neutrophils were negatively selected using a magnetic column. Differential counts showed that the neutrophil purity was between 90–98%.
For human studies, all experiments were approved by University of Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (reference SMBRER310) and were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All subjects gave informed consent. Human peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated using density gradient separation as previously described45 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!