The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

58 protocols using fortessa analyzer

1

Single-Cell Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions prepared above were pelleted and incubated with anti-CD16/anti-CD32 (UCSF Antibody Core Facility or BD Bioscences; 2.4G2) in PBS. Cells were washed and stained with Ghost Viability dye (Tonbo Biosciences) in PBS. Following a wash in PBS, cells were stained for surface markers in PBS containing 2% FCS. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with a FoxP3 buffer set (eBioscences). Samples were run on a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences) in the UCSF Flow Cytometry Core and collected using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar). Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies specific for mouse surface and intracellular antigens were purchased from eBiosciences, BD Biosciences and Biolegend and as detailed in the Key Resources Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described (10 (link)). In brief, spleens and lymph nodes were pressed through a 70 μm strainer to generate a single-cell suspension, preincubated with 1G12 antibody to block nonspecific Fc binding, stained with directly conjugated antibodies for 15 minutes at 4°C, and washed twice. Antibodies and other reagents used for flow cytometry are listed in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3. Staining and washes were performed in PBS with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS). FoxP3 staining was performed with an intracellular staining kit and according to manufacturer instructions (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Apoptosis was measured via annexin V–488 staining (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 minutes at room temperature in annexin staining buffer (BD Biosciences). APL formation was assessed using a CYTO-ID detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences). In some cases, transplanted animals were injected with BrdU 30 minutes prior to euthanization and samples processed according to manufacturer’s instructions (BioLegend 370706). Flow data were captured on a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences) and evaluated using FlowJo software (version 10.1, Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Antimalarial Activity of Hs SH Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synchronous cultures of our cMUT lines were treated with DMSO or RAP at ring stage, diluted to 0.1% parasitemia, and cultured in 96-well round-bottom plates for 3–4 cycles. Samples were collected at schizont stage on the cycle of treatment and at trophozoite stage on the following cycles, fixed for 30 min with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.02% glutaraldehyde (Sigma) in PBSa at RT, diluted 5-fold in PBSa, and stored at 4°C. To determine the antiparasitic activity of HsSH inhibitors, a synchronous culture of P. falciparum 3D7 parasite at 1% parasitemia was treated at ring stage with a dose response of compounds and cultured for 72h in 96-well round-bottom plates. Samples were fixed as described above.
To determine parasitemia by flow cytometry, fixed samples were stained with 1 μg/mL of Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBSa for 30 min at 37°C. Five to ten thousand RBCs per samples were analyzed by flow cytometry using a high-throughput Fortessa Analyzer (BD Biosciences) and the FACSDiva Software v8.0.1. Infected RBCs were distinguished from uRBCs as the population that showed positive DNA staining using a 355 nm UV excitation laser and a 450/50 nm emission filter. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo LLC 2006–2015. For inhibitor treatment, EC50 values were obtained by fitting the parasitemia to a dose response curve in Prism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Cycle Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell sorting for DNA content was performed after staining with 15 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) on a MoFlo flow sorter (Beckman Coulter). The haploid 1n peak was purified. Analytic flow profiles of DNA content were recorded after fixation of the cells in ethanol, RNase digestion and staining with propidium iodide (PI) on a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences). Cell cycle profiles were produced using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Cycle Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell sorting for DNA content was performed after staining with 15 μg ml−1 Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) on a MoFlo flow sorter (Beckman Coulter). The haploid 1n peak was purified. Analytic flow profiles of DNA content were recorded after fixation of the cells in ethanol, RNase digestion and staining with propidium iodide (PI) on a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences). Cell cycle profiles were produced using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies coupled to different fluorochromes were used for the flow cytometry: anti-CD11c (N418), -CD11b (M1/70), -CD8α (53-6.7), -BST-2 (PDCA-1 eBio129c), -CD80 (16-10A1), -CD86 (GL1), and -CD69 (H1.2F3) from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA); -CD19 (ID3), -H2-Kb (AF6-88-5), -I-Ab (AF6-120.1), and -PDC-TREM (4A6) from Biolegend; and -CD40 (HM40-3) from BD Pharmingen. SIINFEKEL/H-2Kb/PE MHC dextramers (Immudex, Copenhagen, Denmark) were used to identify the OVA-specific CD8+ T cells. The control isotypes were purchased from the corresponding providers. Cells were acquired on a Fortessa analyzer (BD). The data were analyzed using the FlowJo Software (Tree Star Inc. Stanford, USA).
To visualize PKH67+ apoptotic cells in pDCs, cells were stained with Abs and digital imaging was performed on an imaging flow cytometer (ImageStreamX; Merck). At least, 104 pDCs were imaged for each sample and analyzed using manufacturer’s software (IDEAS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The cells were resuspended in PBS to 10
7/mL, and 0.5 μL of fluorescent antibody was added to the cell suspension for flow antibody staining. The cell suspension was placed on ice and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes. Multiparametric analysis was performed on a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo-V10 software (Tree Star, Ashland, Oregon, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-cell flow cytometry protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from bone marrow, spleen or peripheral blood. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) buffer, and the remaining cells were resuspended in PBS with 3% FBS. Non-specific antibody binding was blocked by incubation with 20 μg/ml Rat IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min, and cells were then incubated with the indicated primary antibodies for 30 min on ice. Stained cells were quantified using a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences) or isolated with a FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). FlowJo software (TreeStar) was used to generate flow cytometry plots. More details on FACS antibodies found in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bispecific Antibody Internalization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KM-H2 cells were treated with 10 μg/ml of control HA4 or bispecific antibodies on ice. Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and treated with 5 μg/ml of anti-human Fc-Biotin for 10 min on ice to crosslink the antibodies on cell surface. Cells were washed and incubated at 37°C with media for several time points. Cells were stained with streptavidin-APC and analyzed by Fortessa Analyzer (BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA).
Internalization was further analyzed by treating KM-H2 cells with 50 μM of monodansylcadaverine (MDC, Sigma-Aldrich). The presence of the bispecific antibodies was analyzed 24 h later by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sorting and Sequencing Microglia from Embryonic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following single-cell suspension preparation, cells were pelleted and subsequently stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against CD11b (clone M1/70), CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD45.1 (clone A20), CD45.2 (clone 104), CX3CR1 (clone SA011F11; BioLegend), F4/80 (clone BM8; BioLegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4), Ly6G (clone 1A8; BioLegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5), CD115 (clone AFS98), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2), CD11c (clone N418), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1; BioLegend), CD86 (clone GL1; BioLegend), Tmem119 (clone 106–6; Abcam), and either DAPI or propium iodide viability dyes (all from eBioscience if not indicated otherwise). Flow cytometry was performed using a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences), and FACS was performed using a FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) or LSRII (BD Biosciences). The gating strategies used for flow cytometry analysis of embryonic tissues are adapted from Hoeffel et al. (2015) (link) and shown in Fig. S5. Resident microglia were sorted as doubletDAPICD11b+CD45int (Fig. S2 B). Flow cytometry data analysis was performed using FlowJo (TreeStar) software. For ULI RNA-seq, microglia were double-sorted to reach a purity of >98%, and 1,000 cells were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!