The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chromas lite

Manufactured by Technelysium
Sourced in Australia, United Kingdom

Chromas Lite is a DNA sequence analysis software that displays sequence chromatograms. It allows users to view, edit, and analyze DNA sequence data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using chromas lite

1

Equine ASIP Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reference genomic sequences were extracted from Ensembl (Equine ASIP gene, ENSECAG00000004241). PCR and sequencing primers were designed using Primer3 [13 (link)]. The three exons were amplified using three sets of primers [See Additional file 1: Table S1]. PCR amplicons were sequenced using Sanger dideoxy sequencing in both forward and reverse directions by GATC Biotech (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany). Electropherograms were manually inspected with Chromas Lite (Technelysium Pty Ltd, South Brisbane, Australia). Multiple alignments were performed using Multalin ([14 (link)]; http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ADAR Deamination Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADAR protein purification and preparation of RNA substrates have been described previously (29 (link),30 (link)). Deamination assays were performed under single turnover conditions with 1 μM enzyme and 10 nM RNA substrate under conditions of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0, 60 mM KCl, 30 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 8% glycerol, 0.003% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.25 mM BME, 160 U/ml RNasin and 1.0 mg/ml yeast tRNAPhe in a final volume of 10 μl. Each reaction solution was incubated at 30°C for 45 min before adding enzyme and the reaction was allowed to proceed for different times at 30°C prior to being stopped with 10 μl 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate and heating at 95°C for 2 min. Deaminated RNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. RT-PCR was performed on the RNA and the PCR products were purified using an agarose gel. The editing levels were then determined by Sanger sequencing of the RT-PCR products. The sequencing data were quantified using Chromas Lite (Technelysium) and ImageJ and were fit to the equation [P]t = α[1 -e(-kobs*t)], where [P]t is the fraction of deamination product at time t, α is the fitted reaction end point and kobs is the fitted rate constant using KaleidaGraph. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bisulfite Sequencing of DNA Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extracted from muscle (350ng/sample) was treated using the EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was eluted into 12ul of elution buffer. Primers were designed to generate multiple amplicons spanning all CpG dinucleotides within 1000bp upstream of the transcriptional start site. Each primer was fused to a M13F or M13R sequence for facilitation of sequencing. Primer sequences are shown in S1 Table. 1ul of bisulfite treated template was used to generate each amplicon. Amplicons were sequenced by both M13F and M13R primers to ensure full coverage. Sequence chromatograms were analyzed using Chromas Lite (Technelysium Pty Ltd). The peaks of both cytosine and thymine were measured at each CpG dinucleotide site, and a percentage of protected cytosines was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Feline FOXN1 Gene Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reference genomic sequences were excerpted from Ensembl [www.ensembl.org; feline FOXN1 gene, (ENSFCAG00000008268)]. PCR and sequencing primers were designed using Primer3 [47 (link)]. Exonic genomic sequences were amplified and sequenced using primers from S1 Table. Exons were individually amplified for each cat from 100 ng of their genomic DNA according to the manufacturers’ protocol, with Q-Bio Taq DNA Polymerase (Qbiogen MP Biomedicals Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Four hundred ng of each PCR amplicon were sent to GATC Biotech (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany); there, they were purified and Sanger sequenced in both forward and reverse directions. Electropherograms were manually inspected with Chromas Lite (Technelysium Pty Ltd, South Brisbane, Australia). Multiple alignments were performed using Multalin ([48 (link)]; http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/; identity matrix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium oxysporum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the sequence data for the TEF1-α gene and rDNA-IGS generated in this study were initially visualized using ChromasLite (Technelysium, South Brisbane, Australia) and then compared with a BLAST search on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to determine the forma specialis of F. oxysporum, searching for similarities between the sequences obtained in this study and already existing sequences in the database.
Already published sequences (Table 1) of the four races of F. oxysporum f. sp. lactucae and other formae speciales of F. oxysporum were downloaded and used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA version 7.0, and the maximum likelihood (ML) method was used to generate the phylogenetic tree from the concatenated TEF1-α gene and rDNA-IGS region. Bootstrap values were obtained from 1000 replicates and only values greater than 60% are shown in the phylogenetic tree. Distances were calculated using Kimura-2p in both phylogenetic inferences. The sequence of F. subglutinans was used as an outgroup for rooting the phylogenetic tree.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Sequence Analysis of PCR Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual bands were cut from the agarose gel. Isolation of DNA from the gel and sequencing of PCR products using the Sanger method were performed by the Evrogen Joint Stock Company, Moscow, Russia. Analysis of the Sanger sequencing results was conducted using Chromas Lite (Technelysium Pty Ltd, South Brisbane, Australia) software. The alignment of sequencing results with the sequence in the genome was performed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SF3B1 Exon 14 Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exon 14 of SF3B1 was sequenced using PCR-based capillary Sanger sequencing in an additional twenty M3-UM with unusual nBAP1+ protein expression [21 (link)]. Oligonucleotides were constructed by Eurofins Genomics; forward 5’-GGCCGAGAGATCATTTCT-3, reverse 5’-AAGAAGGGCAATAAAGAAGGA-3’, product size 289bp. PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 50 μL containing 100 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 μL of Thermo-Start Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 5 μL of HP Buffer, 4 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 2 μL of dNTP (2 mM each), 31.25 μL Nuclease Free water and 1 μL of each of the primers. The thermal cycling profile was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min and 35 rounds of amplification at 95 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min was added. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing of PCR products was carried out by GATC at Eurofins Genomics in accordance with ISO 17025. Sequencing data were analysed using Chromas Lite (2.1.1., Technelysium Pty Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (10 μg/sample) was isolated and used to synthesize cDNA as described previously (13 (link)). The xfeA transcript in cDNA samples was sequenced using the c T408 F/R primers (Table S2). The sequencing chromatograms were analyzed with Chromas Lite (Technelysium, Brisbane, Australia), and the frequency of editing was estimated by ratiometric A/G measurement as described (13 (link)).
The EasyPure RNA kit was used to purify RNA as recommended (TransGen Biotech), and 1 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with the Magic 1st cDNA synthesis kit (Magic Biotech, Hangzhou, China). The cDNA product (20 μl) was diluted to 100 μl and used for qRT‐PCR with Magic SYBR green qPCR mix (Magic Biotech) and the ABI 7500 quantitative PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Expression was normalized with rpoD using the ΔΔCT method as described (13 (link)). Experiments included three independent biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Variant Screening in CDH1 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA sequence surrounding the variant was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR, primer sequences and PCR conditions are available on request) and screened for mutations using BigDye terminator sequencing (BigDye Terminators (v 1.1) Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Analysis was performed on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Subsequently, the data were analyzed using Vector NTI advance v11.0 (Invitrogen Corporations, Paisley, UK) or Chromas Lite (Technelysium, Australia). For mutation analysis of CDH1 exon 1 in a subset of the patients, primers surrounding the intron-exon boundaries of this exon were used. PCR and sequencing was performed as described for variant validation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microbial Diversity Analysis via 16S rRNA and GroEL Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
16S rRNA gene sequences were analyzed by ChromasLite® (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia) and by MEGA 6 [29 (link)] and aligned with MUSCLE [30 (link)]. Database searches and sequence comparisons were performed with the BLAST tool provided by the National Centre for Biotechnology (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The 16S rRNA gene variants were designated according to Schorn et al. [31 (link)] and Silaghi et al. [32 (link)]. GroEL gene sequences were analyzed in Bionumerics (Version 7.5, Applied Math, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), after subtraction of the primer sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!