The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using b 5 r lsr 2

1

Antigen-Specific Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes from female mice were pulsed with 1 µg/ml of the MHC-I-restricted OVA257-264 peptide or HIV-1 gag peptide as a control before labeling with 5 or 0.5 µM of CFSE (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium), respectively. Labeled cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and a total of 1.5 × 107 mixed cells were adoptively transferred into immunized mice 3 days after the second mRNA treatment. Forty eight hours later, splenocytes from mice were isolated and passed through 70 µm nylon strainers (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) to obtain single-cell suspensions. Red blood cells were lysed using ACK red blood cell lysis buffer (BioWhittaker, Wakersville, MD, USA). Next, splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. Percentage of antigen-specific killing was determined using the following formula: (1 − (%CFSEhi cells/%CFSElow cells)treated mice/(%CFSEhi cells/% CSFElow cells)non-treated mice) × 100. The experiments were performed on a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Treestar, OR). Single cells were gated based on their SSC and FSC. Next CFSE-positive cells were selected. See Supplementary Fig. 5 for gating strategy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Efficient mRNA Transfection in B16 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated 24 h before transfection in a 6- or 96-well plate at 106 or 104 cells/well, respectively. One million B16 cells were transfected with 1 µg of mRNA complexed with Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX (Life Technologies, Ghent; Belgium) diluted in OptiMem to obtain a total volume of 300 µl. The transfection mix was added to the cells and cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% of CO2 during a time period depending on the experiment. Transfection efficiency was evaluated by measuring uptake of Cy-5-labeled eGFP mRNA and the onset of translation of the transfected mRNA by determining GFP fluorescence at different time points after transfection using a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) flow cytometer. The flow cytometric data were analyzed with FlowJo (Treestar, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

OVA-specific T cell expansion quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days prior to mRNA immunization, 2 × 106 OT-I or OT-II cells were purified and labeled with 5 µM of CFSE (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) and subsequently adoptively transferred via i.v. injection into mice that had been s.c. inoculated with B16 cells. Four days after the mRNA treatment, draining lymph nodes were isolated and OT-I or OT-II cell division was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells were stained with anti-CD16/CD32 (500× dilution) (BD Biosciences) to block Fc receptors followed by staining with Fixable Viability Dye (1000× dilution) (BD Biosciences), CD8 PE-Cy7 (200× dilution) (eBiosciences), CD3 efluor450 (200× dilution) (eBioscience), anti-CD19 allophycocyanin (APC; 200× dilution) (BD Biosciences), and MHC-I dextramer H-2 Kb/SINFEKL-PE (500× dilution) (Immundex). The experiments were performed on a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Treestar, OR). Single cells were gated based on FSC and SSC. Living cells were selected and T cells gated for CD3+ CD19 T cells. Within the CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells, OVA-specificity was gated by labeling with MHC-I SINFEKL-PE dextramer. See Supplementary Fig. 4 for the gating strategy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Antigen-Specific T-Cell Killing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes from naive wild-type mice were pulsed with 1 μg/mL MHC class I OVA peptide or HIV-1 Gag peptide as a control before labeling with 5 or 0.5 μmol/L Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Invitrogen), respectively. Labeled cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio, and a total of 1.5 × 107 cells were adoptively transferred into immunized mice 2 weeks after boost. Splenocytes from host mice were analyzed 2 days later by flow cytometry after staining with α-F4/80 (BD Biosciences) to exclude auto-fluorescent macrophages. Percentage antigen-specific killing was determined using the following formula: (1 − (%CFSEhi cells/%CFSElow cells)treated mice/(%CFSEhi cells/% CSFElow cells)non-treated mice) × 100. The experiments were performed on a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tracking Antigen-Specific T Cell Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cells were isolated from spleen and lymph nodes of transgenic OT-I and OT-II mice using CD8+ and CD4+ T cell isolation kit II mouse (Miltenyi Biotec, The Netherlands). Subsequently the T cells were labeled with CFSE (carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester) by incubating 50 × 10 6 cell/ml with 5 M CFSE for 10 min at 37 • C. The reaction was blocked by adding ice-cold PBS (Lonza, Belgium) + 10% serum. 2 × 10 6 OT-I or OT-II cells were injected into the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice. They were treated 2 days later by pVAX2-OVA injection and electroporation. For each site of administration, two injections were performed for a total dose of 5 g of plasmid. Mice were sacrificed 4 days later to collect the draining lymph nodes for single cell suspension preparation. Flow cytometric measurement was performed on a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II with FACSDiva software (Becton Dickinson, Belgium). Analysis was done with FlowJo Software (Treestar, USA). Cells were stained with aqua live dead (Invitrogen, Belgium), ␣-CD16/CD32, CD19 APC-Cy7, CD8 PerCP, CD3 V450 (all BD Biosciences), dextramer SIINFEKL H-2kb PE (Immudex, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!