The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

121 protocols using gradient gel

1

Whole-Cell Extract Preparation and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell extracts were prepared by lysing cell pellets in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad or 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 125 mM Tris-HCl at pH 6.8). Samples were either sonicated or vortexed at highest speed for 30 sec. Samples were boiled for 5 min. For pRPA and BRCA2 Western blots, samples were instead heated for 10 min at 50°C. Proteins were separated on 4%–12% or 3%–8% gradient gels (Invitrogen) by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting was performed using the antibodies indicated in Supplemental Table S10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Growth Factor Quantification and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PR and HPR samples were thawed at 37°C and analyzed within 1 h. Growth factors were determined using the respective Quantikine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, as described in our former research [25] (link)–[27] (link). Standards and samples were assayed in duplicate, and mean values were calculated after taking into account the dilution factor of the samples. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed as before [24] (link) using gradient gels, reagents, and electrophoretic systems from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). A prestained protein molecular weight standard (Novex Sharp, Invitrogen) was used to assess the molecular mass.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting for FANCD2, HA, UBE2T, FANCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extracts were prepared by lysing cell pellets in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) followed by sonication. Samples were boiled and separated on 4–12% or 3–8% gradient gels (Invitrogen) by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting was performed using the following antibodies: FANCD2 (Novus NB100–182), HA (Covance MMS-101R), UBE2T (Abcam EPR9446), FANCI (antibody raised in-house, #589).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Drp1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells growing in 6-well plates were treated with trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich), washed with PBS and sedimented by centrifugation. Next, the cell pellets were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated on ice for 30 min. The lysates were centrifuged at 17000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. The protein concentration was measured using the Bradford method. Lysates were mixed with Bolt LDS Sample Buffer (Life Technologies) supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol (final concentration 5%). Samples containing equal amounts of protein (20 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on gradient gels (4–12%, from Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After blocking in Odyssey Blocking Buffer diluted 1:1 in TBS for 1 hour, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing with TBS-T, the blots were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. The blots were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Drp1 was detected using mouse antibody (BD Bioscience) at a 1:2000 dilution. Rabbit anti-GAPDH (Abcam) was used at 1:50000 dilution. Fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (Li-Cor Biosciences) were used at 1:20000 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling SUMO Conjugation in HIV Leukocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were selected from those that were admitted to Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Istanbul. Experiments were performed in accordance with the established institutional guidelines and approved protocols from the local ethics committee (Name: Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Ethics Committee for Clinical Research, Date and Number: 17 January 2017, 22142), and after obtaining informed consent from all participants. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. Isolation of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear leukocytes from patients’ peripheral blood was performed as described above. Isolated leukocytes were subsequently lysed in standard Laemmli buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol by boiling at 95°C for 10 min. Lysates were cleared upon centrifugation at 11,000g for 10 min. SUMO conjugates were separated on 4–12% gradient gels (Invitrogen) or homemade 8% SDS–PAGE for further analysis by Western blot. Importantly, equal amounts (20 μg) of total protein were loaded in each well to allow fair comparison of SUMO profiles between different samples, that is, HIV(−) or HIV(+) leukoctye extracts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Protocol for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were boiled for 5-10 min in 2X SDS sample buffer (20% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.01% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 167 mM Tris-Cl pH 6.8, 20 mM DTT) and separated by SDS-PAGE on gradient gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare), then blocked with 5% FBS or 5% milk in TBST and probed for 2 h with primary antibodies.
Membranes were washed three times for 5 min with TBST, then probed with appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h, and washed again with TBST, three times for 5 min. Secondary antibody detection was achieved using an Odyssey Scanner (LiCOR) or enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Thermo Fisher Scientific #34579).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for western blot analysis were harvested as described (Räsänen et al., 2008). Samples were run on 4–12% gradient gels (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Using Trans‐Blot Turbo system, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (both from Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and blocked with 5% (w/v) nonfat powdered milk in TBS (20 mm Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, and 0.1% Tween‐20). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with appropriate primary and secondary antibodies using ECL detection (Bio‐Rad).
The following primary antibodies were used according to the manufacturers’ recommended dilutions: rabbit monoclonal anti‐phospho‐p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2, Thr202/Tyr204), rabbit polyclonal anti‐p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2), rabbit monoclonal anti‐phospho‐MEK1/2 (Ser217/221), mouse monoclonal anti‐MEK1/2 (L38C12), rabbit polyclonal anti‐phospho‐STAT3 (Y705), mouse monoclonal anti‐STAT3 (124H6), and rabbit monoclonal anti‐ATF4 (D4B8) (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Rabbit polyclonal anti‐GAPDH was from Sigma‐Aldrich. The secondary antibodies used in western blotting were affinity‐purified horseradish peroxidase‐coupled anti‐rabbit IgG H+L and anti‐mouse IgG H+L (both from Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in a RIPA buffer (300 mM NaCl, 10 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0, 10 mM KCl 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet-P40, 1% Na Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF) and protease inhibitors cocktail (11697498001, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), sonicated on ice with a Branson 450 sonicator through two cycles of ten 2 s pulses (1 min pause between cycles), and then cleared by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 10 min. Equal amounts of protein were separated by 4–12% gradient gels (Life Technologies, Great Island, NY, USA) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (10401396, Whatman, Maidstone, UK). Membranes were blocked with 5% milk in TBST (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 0.1% Tween 20) for one hour at room temperature. Immunostaining was accomplished by overnight incubation with primary antibodies (Table S5) followed by one hour of incubation with dye-conjugated secondary antibodies according to manufacturer’s instructions. Protein detection was achieved by using an Infrared Odyssey system (LiCor, Lincoln, NE, USA). Densitometric analysis of Western blots was performed by using ImageJ software. Actin was used as normalization probe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amino Acid Transporter Regulation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at a density of 2 ×
105 in 6-well plates, allowed to adhere overnight, before
incubation with DMSO, 10 mM BCH, 50 μM ESK242, or 50 μM
ESK246 for 6 h or 3 d. Cells were lysed by the addition of lysis buffer
(200 μL) with protease inhibitor Cocktail III (Bioprocessing
Biochemical) and 1 mM Na3VO4 (Sigma). Equal
protein (micro-BCA method; Pierce, IL) was loaded on 4–12%
gradient gels (Life Technologies), electrophoresed, and transferred
to PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 2.5% (w/v) BSA in
PBS-Tween20, and incubated with the primary and secondary antibodies.
The secondary HRP-labeled antibodies were detected using enhanced
chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce) on a Kodak Imager (Kodak). Antibodies
used in this study were against LAT1 (Cosmo Bio), LAT3 (a kind gift
from Kunimasa Yan, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan), α-tubulin
(Santa Cruz), p-p70S6K, p70S6K, (Cell Signaling), UBE2C (Boston Biochem),
CDK1 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Abcam).
Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey antimouse IgG, donkey antirabbit
IgG, and goat antimouse IgM were used as secondary antibodies (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NRVCMs were lysed 72 h post viral transduction by three freeze–thaw cycles in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM DTT, 500 mM sodium chloride, 1% NP40, 12,5% glycerol) supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktails (Roche, Germany). The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min. to remove cell debris, and the supernatant was used for protein concentration measurement by DC-assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Proteins prepared as above were resolved on 10% SDS–PAGE, or commercially available 4–12% gradient gels (Life Technologies), and transferred to a polyvinylidenefluoride membrane, blocked for 2 h in 5% dry-milk prepared in 0.1% TBST at room temperature (RT), followed by the incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, 4× washes with 0.1% TBST and final incubation with a suitable HRP-coupled secondary antibody (1:10,000) (Santa Cruz, Germany). Protein signals were developed using ECL-select chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare) and visualized on Fluorchem Q imaging system (Biozym). Quantitative densitometry was performed with the help of ImageJ/Fiji version 1.46. All the uncropped immunoblot images have been included as Supplementary Fig. 7. All source data underlying the graphs presented in the main figures using immunoblot densitometry data are made available as Supplementary Data 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!