The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using jsm 7500f microscope

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of SiCWPU Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) data from the SiCWPU membranes were measured with a JSM-7500F microscope (model: JEOL) operating at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. The samples were sprayed with gold prior to observation. The specimens were magnified 1000 times to detect surface morphology changes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was conducted using a JEOL JSM-7500F microscope in order to observe the morphologies of the products. Raman spectra were obtained with 532.13 nm excitation using a JASCO NRS-5100 spectrophotometer. All electrochemical measurements were conducted using a Metrohm Auto B.V. PGSTAT101 potentiostat/galvanostat. EIS Nyquist plots were recorded within a frequency range of 100 mHz to 1 MHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were collected on a Rigaku MiniFlex600 X-ray diffractometer with Cu radiation. The X-ray diffraction data was refined by the RIETAN-2,000 Rietveld refinement program42 . SEM images were taken with a JEOL JSM-7500F microscope (operating voltage, 5 kV) equipped with an EDS analyzer. TEM and high-resolution TEM imaging was obtained on Philips Tecnai G2 F20 (acceleration voltage, 200 kV). Chemical composition was determined by EDS and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS, Hitachi 180-90 spectrophotometer). Surface areas were calculated from the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K on BELsorp-Mini. Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out on a Netzsch STA 449 F3 Jupiter analyzer. XPS was performed by a Perkin Elmer PHI 1,600 ESCA system. The X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra were collected on BL14W1 beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and analysed with software of Ifeffit Athena.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Au-Fe Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The actual loadings of Au in samples were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Spectro, SpectroBlue, Germany). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using Rigaku D/max-2500 (Rigaku, Japan) X-ray diffractometer (Cu Κα, λ = 1.5418 Å) to identify the crystal phase of catalysts. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the samples were got using a JSM-7500F microscope (JEOL, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution (HR) TEM images were obtained using a Tecnai G2F20 microscopy (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operated at 200 kV. Ultraviolet-Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-Vis DRS) were collected using a SHIMADZU UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were recorded using a Nicolet MAGNA-IR 560 spectrometer (Nicolet, Wisconsin, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were accepted using a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD Spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) with a monochromator of Al Kα source to determine the chemical states of Au and Fe. The H2 temperature-programmed reduction profiles (H2-TPR) were tested on a ChemiSorb 2720 (Micromeritics, Georgia, GA, USA) and the temperature programmed desorption profiles of ammonia (NH3-TPD) were obtained using a chemBET TPD (Quantachrome, Florida, FL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of SiCWPU Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected using a Nicolet 560 FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet, Waltham, MA). The sizes of SiCWPU dispersions were measured via dynamic light scattering (DLS). The static contact angle of water was measured on the surfaces of films using a DSA30 contact angle system (KRUSS Co.). Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was carried out using a DMA Q-800 dynamic mechanical analyzer (TA Instruments). X-ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using an XSAM 800 spectrometer (Kratos, UK). Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) data from the SiCWPU membranes were measured with a JSM-7500F microscope (model JEOL). The mechanical properties of the SiCWPU films were measured with a material testing machine (5967, Instron, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Analysis and Surface Wettability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was performed using a JEOL JSM-7500F microscope. Contact angle measurements were conducted using a SurfaceTech GSA-X goniometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Nucleating Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H-NMR spectra of the nucleating agents were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE-400 NMR nuclear magnetic resonance instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) which used chloroform as the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal reference at room temperature. DSC studies were carried out using DSC 821e, (Mettler-Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland) under nitrogen atmosphere and the sample mass was kept at 8–10 mg. Each sample was heated to 300 °C and keep insulated for 5 min to eliminate the thermal history. Then the samples were heated and cooled at constant rates of 5/10/15/20 °C·min−1, respectively. Field emission scanning electron microscopy was carried on FESEM, JSM-7500F microscope (JEOL, Akishima-shi, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a Perkin-ElmerDiamond TGA calorimeter (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) under a nitrogen purge stream at a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1. Vacuum dried samples were subjected to be heated from 25 °C to 700 °C at the rate of 10 °C·min−1. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed at room temperature by using an XRD D-8, (Brook, Karlsruhe, Germany). The experiments were operated from 2θ = 0° to 80° at a scanning rate of 2°·min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder XRD patterns were collected on a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer (MiniFlex600) with Cu Kα radiation. SEM images were obtained on Field-emission JEOL JSM-7500F microscope. TEM and HRTEM images were taken on Philips Tecnai G2 F20. ABF-STEM was performed on Titan Cubed Themis G2 300 (FEI) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The XAS data were collected on BL14W1 beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility and analyzed with software of Ifeffit Athena62 . ICP-AES measurements were conducted on a PerkinElmer Optima 8300. XPS was tested on a Perkin Elmer PHI 1600 ESCA system. Raman spectra were obtained on confocal Thermo-Fisher Scientific DXR microscope using 532 nm excitation. TGA was measured by a Netzsch STA 449 F3 Jupiter analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microstructure Analysis of NLS and NLS+dodecyl

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High resolution scanning microscopy was applied to determine the microstructure of the NLS and NLS+dodecyl. All sample was first lyophilized and suspended in water and then placed on a carbon-coated copper grid. The SEM images were obtained using a JEOL JSM-7500F microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Au Microwires

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Au microwires were resuspended and sonicated in ethanol medium. And let it dry on an aluminium substrate at room temperature. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) imaging was conducted by a JEOL JSM 7500 F microscope equipped with a cold field emission gun at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. An in-lens detector collected secondary electrons and backscattered electrons signals and in-chamber multi-quadrant annular retractable solid-state detector, respectively. Element analysis was carried out using Zeiss Neon 40EsB (Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) at 20 kV equipped with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, EDX (Inca software, Oxford Instruments). Image analysis on FESEM data was carried out using ImageJ 1.50i. Au microwires density was determined using the plugin ‘analyse particles’ function of ImageJ on a total of 20 SEM images of Au microwires samples. The aggregated size of Au microwires was calculated from a total of 2000 randomly picked aggregated Au microwires from FESEM images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!