The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Raman spectrometer

Manufactured by Horiba
Sourced in France, Japan

The Raman spectrometer is an analytical instrument that measures the inelastic scattering of light, known as the Raman effect, to provide information about the molecular structure and composition of a sample. The device illuminates the sample with a monochromatic light source, typically a laser, and then detects the shift in the wavelength of the scattered light, which is unique to the specific molecules present in the sample. This information can be used to identify and quantify the components of a material without the need for sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using raman spectrometer

1

Comprehensive Microstructural and Structural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of these samples were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS Merlin, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The crystalline structure of the electrode materials was determined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D/max-IIIA with nickel-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm), Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on an AMICUS (Shimadzu, Japan) spectrometer with monochromated Mg Kα radiation. The nitrogen sorption measurements were carried out using an ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Georgia, GA, USA). The Raman spectra were recorded on a Raman Spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin Yvon, Paris, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of TF3-Treated Dentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TF3 powder and demineralized dentin collagen treated with 100 mg/ml TF3, 5% GA, and ethanol solutions were freeze-dried and analyzed by Raman spectrometer (Horiba Lab RAM HR Evolution, Japan). The parameters are set as follows: The sample is divided into 1 mm blocks, and three scans lasting 60 s are performed in the specified sample area. Details of the spectrum are captured using a laser beam with a wavelength of 514 nm, ranging from 50 cm−1–4,000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of MPB SCBK Device

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Current-time characteristic measurements of MPB SCBK were performed by using a Keithley 4200A semiconductor parametric analyser (Tektronix) and a C-100 probe station from TPSi Company in the dark at room temperature. The SEM image and energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) mapping results of the gold electrode and MPB SCBK were measured by means of a Phenom Pro-X. A three-dimensional (3D) pseudocolour plot of the gold electrode deposited on the MPB SCBK was obtained by using a KEYENCE VK-X200 3D laser scanning microscope. The absorption spectrum and transmission spectrum were recorded on an Agilent Cary 5000. The XRD measurement was performed by using a BRUKER D8 FOCUS. Raman spectra were recorded on a HORIBA Scientific Raman spectrometer with 785 nm laser excitation in air at room temperature. Steady-state PL spectra of MPB SCBK with different applied voltages were obtained by means of a HORIBA Scientific Raman spectrometer at 473 nm laser with 2.55 m W cm−2 laser intensity in air at room temperature. The PL confocal micrographs of MPB SCBK were obtained by Nikon ECLIPSE Ti with 486 nm laser excitation in air at room temperature. The J–V characteristic curves of MPB SCBK were obtained by using a Keithley 4200A semiconductor parametric analyser (Tektronix) and a C-100 probe station from TPSi Company in air at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Nanomaterials by TEM, SEM, and Raman

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were obtained by transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-2100). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (JEOL, JSM-7500). UV–vis spectra were performed employing spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Japan). The Raman measurements were recorded by a Raman spectrometer (HORIBA, France) using a 785 nm excitation laser, the acquisition time was 5s and the accumulation was 2 times, the spectra were only scanned once and baseline correction was performed to obtain the final spectra with the background subtracted. Each sample was measured five times and each spectrum was the average of five measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using a KBr carrier containing the powder sample by employing an ENSOR spectrometer. A JSM-7610Fplus scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a primary electron energy of 5 kV was employed to examine the surface morphologies of the products. TEM images were obtained by applying a FEI Tecnai G2F30 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected with a Rigaku D/Max-2500 X-ray diffractometer using a Cu target radiation source. The Raman spectrum in the range of 500–2000 cm−1 was determined using a Raman spectrometer (HORIBA Scientific) with laser energy of 532 nm wavelength. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra were acquired at room temperature using a SHIMADZU 3100 UV-Vis-near-IR spectrophotometer. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were collected using a VG ESCALAB MKII with Al Ka excitation (1361 eV). Binding energy calibration was based on the C 1s spectrum at 284.6 eV. The degradation intermediates of MB were analyzed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS, LTQ, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All mass spectra were recorded in full scan mode over the range from 50 to 1000 m/z for qualitative analysis. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectroscopy measurements were performed on an Optima 7000 DV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Nanocomposite Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethylene glycol (EG), ethanolamine (EA), ethylenediamine (ED), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and hydrogen peroxide (28%, H2O2) were supplied by Duksan Co. (Korea). Commercial Pt/C catalysts (20 wt% Pt loading) was a product of E-TEK. The aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water. The morphologies of all synthesized samples were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips, CM-200). The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet iS5 FTIR spectrometer. The UV-Vis absorption spectra (Shimadzu UV-1900I) were collected over the wavelength range of 200 nm to 500 nm. The photoluminescent (PL) spectra were examined by a PicoQuant FluoTime 200 Compact Fluorescence Spectrometer. The Raman spectra were recorded on a model XploRa plus (HORIBA) Raman spectrometer (laser excitation at 532 nm). The surface properties of the catalysts were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS Nova) using Al Kα monochromatized radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confocal Raman Mapping of Microstructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collection of confocal Raman single point spectra was carried out with a JobinYvon/Horiba Raman Spectrometer equipped with a 784 nm infrared laser, 600 nm -1 grating, and 50x objective microscope. Slit width was 300 m and collection time was 10s. Scans were made in duplicate. Mapping of 50 m x50 m area was carried out overnight for a total area of 400 points using a step size of 2.5 m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of MoS2(1-x)Se2x

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Room-temperature ADF-STEM imaging was performed using a JEOL ARM200F at 200 kV located at the David Cockayne Center for Electron Microscopy (DCCEM) within the Department of Materials at the University of Oxford. Imaging conditions used a 30-µm CL aperture with a convergence semi-angle of 22.5 mrad and a beam current of 35 pA. The acquisition angles for these images were 72.8–271 mrad. Dwell time per pixels was typically 32 µs.
The morphology of the MoS2(1−x)Se2x domains was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Scios, 15 kV), and the thickness was measured by AFM (Bruker Dimension Icon, tapping mode). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi) was used to characterize the chemical composition of alloys. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) imaging was performed on a field emission TEM (FEI Tecnai F20, 200 kV); selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) measurements were performed on a TEM operating at 120 kV (FEI Tecnai T12). Raman and micro-PL spectra/mapping were collected with a confocal Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin–Yvon HR Evolution) using a 532 nm laser as the excitation source. The laser spot size was 1 mm, and the laser power on the sample surface was kept below 60 mW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrode Characterization by SEM and Raman

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to verify the particle size and topography of the working electrode, SEM images were obtained using a JEOL 5600 LV, with an accelerating voltage of 12–20 kV. Electron dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was carried out using a solid state EDAX silicon drift detector (20,000×) on a SEM 6400. A Horiba Aramis Raman spectrometer with a 532-nm laser source was used to obtain Raman spectra. The Raman spectrometer settings for all samples also included a confocal hole of 100 nm with a 1–3% transmission filter (range from 400 to 3000), at 20 s per scan and 1× ad hoc averaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Tin Sulfide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD patterns of the tin sulfide based samples were collected on a PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation at a scan rate of 2° min−1. The surface morphologies of the samples were recorded on a SEM of JEOL JSM‐7500FA. TEM was carried out on a JEOL JEM‐2100F microscope. The XPS measurements were performed on the VG Multilab 2000 (VG Inc.) photoelectron spectrometer with the monochromatic Al Kα radiation under vacuum at 2 × 10−6 Pa. Raman analysis was performed with a Raman spectrometer of HORIBA Scientific with the laser line of 633 nm and the accumulations of 50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!