The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using drb 200

1

Measuring Total COD and Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total COD was determined by adding 400 µL of solution, medium, or lysate to a HACH COD vial (HACH, High Range 20–1500 mg COD/L) with 1600 μL of DI water followed by a 2-h incubation at 150 °C (HACH DRB200). The vials were then cooled and measured for COD concentration in mgCOD/L using a spectrophotometer (HACH DR2800 Laboratory Spectrophotometer). For microbiome composition analysis, we performed 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing using Illumina sequencing technology and found core differences as described [24 (link),25 (link)]. Further detailing regarding the 16S rRNA amplicon sequences is presented in Supplementary File S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Landfill Leachate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physicochemical properties of leachate sample such pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured by portable meters pocket type HI9146 (HANNA), HI98301 (HANNA) and HI9146 (HANNA), respectively. To determine the COD values of the leachate samples Colorimeter (HACH, DR/890), COD Reactor (HACH, DRB 200) and COD Digestion Reagent High Range Vial (HACH) were used. The dry weight (DW) content of leachate samples was determined by taking a portion of the sample into the preweighed porcelain crucibles cleaned and dried in an oven previously and oven-dried at 105 °C for 24 h. Then the oven-dried sample was heated in the muffle furnace at 550 °C for 2 hour. The volatile dry weight (VDW) content was measured by calculating the differences between the two weights. The VDW corresponds to the organic fraction of samples (Simon et al., 2009 (link)). TOC of liquid samples were determined by Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analyzer using combustion technique in the presence of oxidative catalyst working at 680 °C with non-dispersive infrared detection NDIR system (TOC 5000A, Shimadzu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Water Quality Analysis Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All water samples were filtered using a 0.45 µm filter (PALL, China) before the determination of NO3-N, and NO2-N. The concentrations of COD, TN, TP, NO3-N, and NO2-N were determined according to the methods of Zhang et al. (2020) (link) and Tu et al. (2010) (link). The COD concentration was determined using the acidic potassium dichromate oxidation method (HACH heating system, DR 900, DRB 200; HACH Co., Loveland, CO, USA); TN and TP concentrations were measured using the potassium persulfate digestion method; NO3-N and NO2-N concentrations were measured using the phenol disulfonic acid and Griess-Saltzman methods, respectively.
All data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and presented as mean values ± SD (standard deviation). Significant differences in the means between treatments were determined by Duncan’s multiple range tests. Probabilities of P < 0.05 were considered significant. GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 and Origin 2019b were used to plot the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Quantification of Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCP was extracted at the end of the experiment by the alkaline extraction method reported by Perovic et al. with minor modifications [47 (link)]. The 15 mg of lyophilized ground sample was mixed with 10 mL of 0.4 M NaOH and agitated on a compact digital rocker (Model 88880020, Thermo Scientific, USA) at 100 rpm for 30 min. After agitation, samples were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (CPX1800H-E, Branson, USA) at 70 °C for 2 h followed by digestion at 100 °C for 1 h in a COD digital reactor block (DRB 200, Hach, USA). After samples were cooled down, these samples were centrifuged at a speed of 23,366 g and a temperature of 4 °C, and pellets were discarded. To precipitate the proteins, the pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 3 by adding 1 M HCl, drop by drop. The sample was then centrifuged again, followed by pH adjustment to 12 using 1 M NaOH. The sample was centrifuged a final time and the supernatant was analysed for true protein using the Lowry protein assay method [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined using a COD colorimeter (DR1010, HACH, Loveland, CO, USA) with a digestion device (DRB200, HACH) according to the US EPA approved HACH Method No. 8000. The pH value was measured using a pH meter (pHS-3C, Leici, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with Glass electrode method (Chinese National Standard GB 6920-86). NH3-N and TP were determined using an ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometer (T6xinyue, HuaBi Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Nanjing, China) with Nascar reagent photometry and Chinese National Standard GB 11893-89. PVA was analyzed using the UV–Vis spectrophotometer (DR 6000, HACH) at 690 nm, based on the blue color produced by the reaction of PVA with iodine (analytically pure, Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) in the presence of boric acid (analytically pure, Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd.) [2 (link)]. The turbidity of the PML was determined using a turbidity meter (ET93810, Lovibond® Tintometer Group, Dortmund, Germany) according to the US EPA 180.1 method. The BOD5 was determined according to the pressure sensor method with an automated measurement apparatus. The measurement of BOD (20 °C, 5 days) was performed using a pressure sensor method with an automated measurement apparatus (BOD Trak II, HACH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Water Quality and Plant Growth Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water in each system was sampled for water quality at the end of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th batches. The water temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured by a Temperature/Light Data Logger (HOBO UA-002-08; Onset, Cape Cod, MA, USA), a portable Multi-parameter Water Quality Meter (U52; Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and a DO electrode (HQ40D-53LED; Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA), respectively. NH4+–N, NO2–N, NO3–N, total nitrogen (TN), and COD were determined through water quality analyzing systems (DRB200 and DR2800; Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA) according to standard analytical procedures [28 ]. The water sampling was conducted according to guidelines on sampling from lakes, natural and man-made (ISO/FDIS 5667-4:2016).
Biomass and nitrogen content of plant samples from the beginning and end of the experiment were determined according to [29 ]. Briefly, plant samples were separated into roots, stems, and leaves, dried at 65 °C to a constant weight, grounded into powder, and then measured by an elemental analyzer (CHN-O-Rapid; W. C. Heraeus GmbH., Hanau, Germany) [30 (link)]. Root vitality was quantified with the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method [29 ]. The rate of root ROL was measured through the titanium (III) citrate buffer method [31 (link),32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analytical Techniques for Environmental Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A refrigerator (LR1602, Lec Refrigeration PLC England), ICP-OES, Polyethylene bottles, Palin test photometer 7100 (UK), micro 800 multi-parameter, BOD Trak ™ II (HACH), DRB 200 (HACH) and HACH DR 900, Digital electric precision balance (Citizone, CTG 1200–1200, India), Conical flasks (100 mL), fume-cupboard (envair Ltd, England), Filtration funnels, Whatman filter paper No.1,volumetric flasks, Measuring cylinders, and micropipettes were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Zeolite-Based Photocatalytic Decolorization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeolite with a particle size of 23 µ was procured from a company in Balıkesir, Turkey. It was a commercial product and used without purification. HCl and NaOH were procured from Tekkim, DB-22 (commercial name Direct Black 22 VSF 1600) from a company named "HNY" in Turkey, H 2 O 2 (34.5-36.5 A magnetic stirrer (HSD-180), pH meter (C561, Consort), digital scale (Ohaus), centrifuge (Nuve, NF 200), and incubator (Ecocell) were used in the study. UV-spectrophotometer (Hach, DR-2400) was used to measure the absorbance of the sample. A COD reactor (Hach DRB 200) was used to heat the samples before measuring the COD value. A UV lamp (Light Tech GPH212T5L/4, 10 W) with a wavelength of 254 nm was used in the photocatalytic decolorization of DB-22.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mesocosm Water Quality Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water temperature in the mesocosms was recorded by the Temperature and Illuminance Data Logger (HOBO Pendant UA-002-08, Onset, USA). The pH was determined by a portable Multi-parameter Water Quality Meter (U-52, HORIBA, Japan). Dissolved oxygen (DO) was monitored in situ using DO electrodes (HQ40d-53 LED, HACH, USA). The concentrations of NH4+-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, TN and COD were determined with a Water Quality Analyzing System (DRB200 and DR2800, HACH, USA). All variables were analysed according to standard analytical procedures66 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Wastewater Treatment Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unconditioned FS was analysed for electric conductivity (EC), pH, salinity, temperature, total solids (TS), total volatile solids (TVS), TSS, chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N). Supernatant from Imhoff cones and settling columns and leachate from dewatering columns were analysed for EC, pH, salinity, temperature, TS, TSS and COD. The analysis of solids parameters was based on Standard Methods.[29 ] TS were measured gravimetrically by drying in an oven at 105°C, and TVS at 550°C. Cellulose nitrated or glass fiber filters with a diameter of 47 mm and a pore size between 0.7 and 1.2 µm were used for TSS analysis. COD was determined with Hach vials, a Hach DRB200 heating block and a Hach DR4000v and a Dr. Lange Lasa50 spectrophotometer based on the manufacturer’s directions. EC, temperature and salinity were determined with a WTW MultiLine P4 and pH with a HANNA HI 9124 according to the manufacturer’s directions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!