The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 9

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States, Austria, Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Belgium, China, Lao People's Democratic Republic, France

Prism 9 is a powerful data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It provides a suite of tools for organizing, analyzing, and visualizing scientific data. Prism 9 offers a range of analysis methods, including curve fitting, statistical tests, and data transformation, to help researchers and scientists interpret their data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

24 382 protocols using prism 9

1

Statistical Analysis of Immune Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient characteristics were compared using chi-squared tests for categorical variables with standard deviation (SD) (Prism 9.0, GraphPad Software). Differences in antibody titers and T cell responses were determined using an unpaired, two-tailed nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test with standard error of the mean (SEM) using Prism 9.0. Linear regression analysis to assess correlation between two parameters was performed by calculating the Pearson value (r) and the corresponding P value using Prism 9.0. Unpaired, one-way Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance were used to compare responder, non-responder, and negative responder subgroups (Prism 9.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analyses and Data Visualization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses and P-value determinations were performed using GraphPad Prism QuickCalcs or GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0, GraphPad Software). To determine P-values, an unpaired Student’s t-test was performed between two groups of data, comparing full datasets as stated in the figure legends and Table S2. For P-values in multiple comparisons (unpaired; one or two-way ANOVA), Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed in GraphPad Prism 9. All scatter plots were created with GraphPad Prism 9. Curve fitting (Figure 7F) was done with a smoothing spline curve set to four knots with GraphPad Prism 9. Live-cell actin burst, along with the standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.) were plotted using Microsoft Excel for Office 365 (version 16.0.11231.20164, Microsoft Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Protein-DNA and Protein-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graphpad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) was used to plot graphs.
FRET histograms were fit either using the Photon Distribution Analysis (PDA) functionality of PAM or with Gaussian distributions using Graphpad Prism 9.
Dimerization affinity measurements were fit using Graphpad Prism 9 with the equation:
Y=Ymin+(YmaxYmin)×1+KdKd(Kd+8MT)4MT
where Y is the fraction of protein in the folded/bound form, Ymin is the minimum Y value, Ymax is the maximum Y value (set equal to 1), MT is the total concentration of protein monomers, and Kd is the dissociation constant of dimerization. The concentration of labeled protein was assumed to be negligible. Derivation of this equation can be found in the Supporting Equations.
To obtain apparent affinities, DNA binding measurements were fit using Graphpad Prism 9 to the standard equation for a one-site binding model where ligand concentration cannot be neglected:
Y=Ymin+(YmaxYmin)×(Kd+P+D)(Kd+P+D)24PD2P
where Y is the fraction of protein in the folded/bound form, Ymin is the minimum Y value, Ymax is the maximum Y value, Kd is the dissociation constant between protein and DNA, P is the protein concentration expressed in terms of dimers (the DNA-binding form), and D is the DNA concentration.
Derivation of equations and details of each fit can be found in the Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanobody-based inhibition analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanobody sequences were aligned using T-coffee (62 ). Bar and line graphs were created using GraphPad Prism 9.3.0. Binding and inhibition curves were fitted in GraphPad Prism 9.3.0 using the functions “[inhibitor] versus normalized response–Variable slope” and “Asymmetric Sigmoidal, 5PL, X is concentration”. Fitted curves of three individual experiments were used to calculate IC50 and EC50 values with SD in GraphPad Prism 9.3.0. SPR data were analyzed in Scrubber 2.0 (www.biologic.com.au/scrubber.html) and plotted in GraphPad Prism 9.3.0 (www.graphpad.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mitochondrial Function and Metabolic Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data in bar graphs are presented as mean ± SD, except for scoring data, which are displayed as median. Nonparametric scoring data were tested using Kruskal–Wallis test. Mean ranks between groups were compared while correcting for FDR using Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli two-stage step-up method. Remaining data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparison post hoc test in Sigmaplot 13.0 (Systat Software Inc) and GraphPad Prism 9.1.0 (GraphPad Software). Sequencing data and proteomics were analyzed as described in the relevant sections. Data from the oxygraph measurements were analyzed with repeated two-way ANOVAs for each step. Data from all ADP concentrations were analyzed together. Data with unequal variance were transformed using log transformation. If equal variance was still not obtained, data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test, with correction for FDR as described previously. All nonparametric statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.1.0. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated using GraphPad Prism 9.2.0. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. ∗/∗∗ indicates effects of genotype, p < 0.05/0.01, respectively. #/## indicates effects of treatment (diet or NR), p < 0.05/0.01, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Preclinical Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all experiments with two groups, mean values were compared using an unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism 9.1.0). Multiple groups were analysed using one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism 9.1.0). For the survival examination of mice, survival curves were analysed by performing a Mantel–Cox test (GraphPad Prism 9.1.0). P-values of <0.05 were considered significant. The following P-values were used: *P = 0.01–0.05; **P = 0.001–0.01; ***P < 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The n values, representing the exact number of mice used for the experiments, are indicated in the figure legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Behavioral Assessment of Cognitive Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's multiple comparison test (GraphPad-Prism 9.0). In addition, T-maze data are analyzed in comparison to chance level (CL), i.e., maximal deficit, using a one sample t-test (GraphPad-Prism 9.0). P 0.05 was considered significant. The number of animals in each group is indicated within the columns and was determined by a statistical power analysis based on our previous studies (G*Power software). Before each analysis of variance, the Gaussian distribution was evaluated and validated by a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (GraphPad-Prism 9.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Neuronal Processes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed at least 3 times (n ≥ 3). At least three mice/group were used. For live-cell imaging, >150 neurons/condition were counted for each n. For colocalization, puncta counting, and TDP-43 intensity, ≥10 neurons/condition were counted for each n. For the FRAP experiment, ≥5 cells/conditions were analyzed for each n. When two groups were compared, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test assessed the normality of each population. If the two populations’ results were normally distributed, then the unpaired t-student test was performed using the built-in function in Prism GraphPad 9.0. If one or both populations were not normally distributed, then the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare ranks or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used using Prism GraphPad 9.0. The log-rank and Cox proportional hazards tests compared the Kaplan Meier curves and the statistical significance between curves was assessed with Cox (GraphPad software). For the FRAP experiment, statistical differences between the curves were evaluated by curve analysis (one-way ANOVA test) in Prism GraphPad 9.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Cell Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean and STDEV were calculated with GraphPad Prism 9.0.2 (161). Localization patterns from fluorescence microscopy data, cell length distribution, and constrictions frequency were quantified based on the indicated number of cells per strain in three independent experiments unless otherwise indicated. Scatter dot plots were generated with GraphPad Prism 9.0.2 (161). Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 9.0.2 (161). All data sets were tested for significant differences using a two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. A P-value < 0.01 was used to determine statistically significant difference. All P-values are provided in the figure legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis Protocols for Biological Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prism9 was used to generate all graphics. Nonparametric T-Tests (Mann–Whitney) were performed using Prism9 to generate all reported P values unless otherwise stated. Elsewhere, nonparametric one-way ANOVA (Kruskal Wallace) was performed using Prism9 to analyze RT-qpCR-generated data, and Rayleigh’s Tests was performed using ImageJ to analyze chemotaxis data. Throughout, an alpha value of 0.05 was used.
NS = nonsignificant = P > 0.05.
* = P < 0.05.
** = P < 0.01.
*** = P < 0.001.
**** = P < 0.0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!