The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

324 protocols using fibronectin

1

Quantifying Bacterial Adhesion to Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epithelial cells, grown in 96-well plates, were incubated for 30 min with 100 μL/well of DMEM-F12 only or supplemented with fibronectin (1 μg/well), antibodies anti-integrin α5β1 that block the interaction with RGD site in fibronectin (Abcam) or anti-integrin α5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Then, medium was aspirated and bacteria were added to the monolayer (in triplicate), with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 h and then washed three times with PBS. Cells were lysed with a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100/PBS and serial dilutions of the lysates were plated on LB agar. The number of adherent bacteria was determined by counting colonies forming units (CFU).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Fibrosis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the hTECs were removed from culture dishes, the proteins were retrieved using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing Halt protease inhibitor (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Western blotting was performed using primary antibodies against fibronectin (Abcam), CCL8 (Novus Biologics), E-cadherin (Abcam), BCL-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), CD44 (Abcam), CCR2 (Abcam), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich) CD44 (Abcam), a transmembrane receptor, interacts with cell-matrix components, such as fibronectin and collagen, and is a potential marker of fibrosis. Equal amounts of extracted proteins (20~40 μg) were isolated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto Immobilon-FL 0.4 μm of polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-mouse IgG (Cell Signaling Technology) were used as horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The immunoblot bands were visualized and images were captured using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 Mini instrument (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ, USA). Western blotting results were quantified using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Cell Morphology and Surface Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell morphology and surface protein expression of the two types of cells were compared. Morphologic observations of the third passage dADSCs and VFFs were made using an inverted microscope. The cell surface protein expression levels were identified by cell immunofluorescence.
When the cells reached 80% to 90% confluence, they were fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes and rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). They were permeabilized in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT). All cells were blocked (3% horse serum in PBS, 30 minutes, RT) and incubated for 2 hours (4°C) with the following primary antibodies: vimentin (monoclonal mouse vimentin, 1∶200; Novus, Littleton, CO, USA) and fibronectin (polyclonal rabbit fibronectin, 1∶100; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). After a thorough washing, the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1∶400; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1∶400; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 hour (RT). All slides were counterstained using Hoechst 33342 (1∶1000; Roche; 10 minutes, RT) for nuclear staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of ECM Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All histological samples were fixed in 10% v/v buffered neutral formalin and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H+E) for light microscopy.
IHC was performed to assess retention of key ECM and basement membrane proteins collagens I and IV, laminin and fibronectin (all Abcam/UK). All samples were treated identically with regards to fixation, antigen retrieval, antibody staining, blocking and development. Briefly, paraffin-embedded sections were dewaxed and blocked with 1% v/v hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 minutes. Heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed in 0.01M sodium citrate buffer (Sigma/UK), pH 6.0, followed by Avidin-Biotin blocking (Dako/UK). Sections were blocked for 1 hour with 5% v/v goat serum in PBS, and primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 o C.
Primary antibody dilutions in blocking solution (5% v/v goat serum in PBS) were: collagen I 1:250, collagen IV 1:500, laminin 1:50, and fibronectin 1:500 (Abcam/UK).
After washing sections in 0.1% v/v TWEEN (Sigma/UK) in PBS, pH 7.4, hydrogen peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam/UK) was applied at 1:100 for 1 h at room temperature then washed again in TWEEN solution. Slides were developed using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Dako/UK) until good staining intensity was observed.
Species immunoglobulin and PBS served as negative controls. Haematoxylin was used for nuclear counterstaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting from Rat Kidneys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total tissue and cell protein extracted from rat kidneys and GMCs were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) and measured with a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). Nuclear protein was extracted using the Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction kit (cat. no. P0028; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein was separated by 10% SDS–PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk and incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C: TRPC6, collagen IV, collagen I, fibronectin, and NFAT2 from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) as well as β-actin and histone 3 from ABclonal (Wuhan, China). On the next day, HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG, which served as the secondary antibody, was incubated with the membranes for 2 h at room temperature to detect immune response bands. ECL chemiluminescence was used for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Knockdown of MAGEC2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One HCC cell line (MHCC97H) was generously provided by Yuanduan Biological Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). Two other HCC cell lines (SK-H-1 and HepG2) and the human liver cell line LO-2 were obtained from the cell bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). For MAGEC2 knockdown, the target sequence of the short hairpin RNA (shRNA) was as follows: 5ʹ- CCT CTT CCA CTT TGT ACT T -3ʹ (Gene ID: NM_016249). The shRNA targeting MAGEC2 (sh-MAGEC2) was cloned into pLKD-CMV-G&PR-U6-shRNA (Obio Technology, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). An unrelated random sequence was used as an sh-MAGEC2 negative control (sh-MAGEC2-NC). After viral transduction, MAGEC2 expression was evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Western blotting (WB) analyses. The primary antibodies, including MAGEC2, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, fibronectin, Slug, cleaved caspase-3, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E and Ki67, were all purchased from Abcam Co., Ltd. (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected, washed, and extracted with PRO-PREP™ protein extraction solution (iNtRON Biotech, Sungnam, Korea). Fifty micrograms of proteins were separated on an 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacryamide gel by electrophoresis. The proteins were transferred to Nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were incubated with antibodies of Collagen type 1, Collagen type 4, Fibronectin, Elastin, TGFb Receptor1, SMAD2, p-SMAD2, SMAD3, p-SMAD3 and GAPDH (1:1000; abcam, Cambridge, USA). Then, the membranes were washed and incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:5000, abcam). Membranes were developed using ECL (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, USA) and quantified using a densitometer. Mean pixel density was quantified using Image J analysis Representative western blot of Collagen type 1, Collagen type 4, Fibronectin, Elastin, TGFb Receptor1, SMAD2, p-SMAD2, SMAD3 and p-SMAD3 those of either total protein or GAPDH to correct for protein loading in the case of cellular lysate extracts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies against VE-cadherin (Cell Signaling Technology [CST], USA), vimentin (CST) or fibronectin (Abcam), followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488- or 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, USA). For confocal microscopy, the cells grown on coverslips were counterstained with DAPI and were imaged using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with a core data acquisition system (Applied Precision).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Assay for Cell-Cell Junctions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-Tgfβ3 (Cat#AF-243-NA) and anti-EphB2 (Cat#AF467) were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The TgfβrI Kinase Inhibitor VI (SB431542) was from Calbiochem (EMD Millipore Cat#616465) (Billerica, MA). EphB2 ectodomain Fc fusion protein was from R&D Systems (Cat #467-B2) (Minneapolis, MN). IgG Fc protein was from Calbiochem (EMD Millipore Cat #401104) (Billerica, MA). Recombinant Tgfβ3 was purchased from R&D systems, CA. For Immunofluorescence, primary antibodies used (and their source) included the following:, E-Cadherin, Desmoplakin, and Plakoglobin (kindly provided by Dr. James Wahl, University of Nebraska Medical Center), Vimentin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO), Fibronectin (Abcam, MA), ZO-1 (Invitrogen, CA). All antibodies and inhibitors were used at the concentration and time point recommended by the respective manufacturer/provider.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical analysis of cancer markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After deparaffinization and rehydration, the paraffin-embedded sections were subjected to high pressure for 2 min for antigenic retrieval. The slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: Hes1 (Bioss, dilution 1:500), PTEN (Cell Signaling, dilution 1:200), E-cadherin (BD, dilution 1:300), Fibronectin (Abcam, dilution 1:300), and Snail (Cell Signaling, clone C15D3, dilution 1:100). PBS were used as negative controls. The sections were then incubated with DAB for 2 min. The staining intensity of tumor cells was grouped into four grades: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining; 2, modest staining; and 3, strong staining. The positive staining ratio of tumor cells was classified into four grades: 0, no positive tumor cells; 1, < 10% positive tumor cells; 2, 10–50% positive tumor cells; and 3, > 50% positive tumor cells. The positive staining ratio of tumor cells = hes1-positive tumor cells/total tumor cellsX100%. The general IHC results were calculated by multiplying the positive staining grade by the intensity grade (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9). Finally, general IHC results ≦4 and ≧6 were defined as low and high expression, respectively. Two pathologists examined and scored IHC results blindly without knowing the clinical characteristics and prognosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!