The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using f4 80 clone bm8

1

Comprehensive Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were washed in FACS buffer (1% BSA, 0.01% sodium azide, 2.5 mM EDTA in sterile PBS; 650 g, 10 min, 4°C) and preincubated for 15 min with anti-CD16/CD32 Fc-block antibody (10 μg/mL; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, 1:50) in FACS buffer followed by a 30 min incubation with fluorescence dye-conjugated, anti-mouse antibodies for SiglecF (clone E50–2440, 1:400), CD11c (clone N418, 1:100), CD11b (clone M1/70, 1:100), Ly6G (clone 1A8, 1:50, clone 1A8, 1:400), Ly6C (clone HK1.4, 1:80/1:600), F4/80 (clone BM8, 1:100), CD62L (clone DREG-56, 1:80), CD66b (clone G10F5, 1:40), and corresponding isotype controls (all from BioLegend). Analysis was done in adherence to guidelines [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD3 clone 17A2 (BioLegend 100237 and 100244), CD4 clone RM4–5 (BioLegend 100545 and 100510), CD4 clone GK13 (BioLegend 100403), CD8 clone 53–6.7 (BioLegend 100734), CD11b clone M1/70 (BioLegend 101257), CD11c clone N418 (BioLegend 117339 and 117338), CD19 clone 6D5 (BioLegend 115522), CD24 clone M1/69 (BioLegend 101822), CD45 clone 30-F11 (BioLegend 103139, 103132, and 103114; eBioscience 56–0451-82), CD45R clone RA3–6B2 (BioLegend 103247, 103246, and 103226), CD69 clone H1.2F3 (eBioscience 25–0691-81), CD90.2 clone 30-H12 (BioLegend 105331), CD103 clone 2E7 (BioLegend 121406 and 121414), F4/80 clone BM8 (BioLegend 123108), Flt3L (R&D Systems AF427), Ly6C clone HK1.4 (BioLegend 128037), Ly6G clone 1A8 (BioLegend 127645), MHC-II clone M5/114.15.2 (BioLegend 707631), NK1.1 clone PK136 (BioLegend 108707, 108720, and 108749), Streptavidin-Brilliant Violet 650 (BioLegend 405231), Streptavidin-APC (eBioscience 17–4317-82). Depleting antibodies: NK1.1 clone PK136 (BioXCell BE0036), and IgG2a isotype control (BioXCell BE0085).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Cell and Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described previously35 , subcutaneous tumours with KP1.9 cells were harvested from C57BL/6 flanks 3 weeks after implantation, minced, and shaken at 600 r.p.m. with 0.2 mg ml−1 collagenase type I (Worthington Biochemical Corporation) in RPMI-1640 for 30 min at 37 °C. Digested samples were filtered (70 μm BD Falcon strainer); washed in PBS with 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA; incubated with Fc-block (TruStain fcX anti-mouse CD16/32; clone 93; Biolegend) for 15 min at 4 °C; and labelled with antibodies as indicated for 45 min at 4 °C. Flow cytometry (LSRII, BD Biosciences) labelled tumour cells (CD45 EpCAM+), TAM (CD45+ CD11b+ Ly6C- Lin- CD11c+ F4/80+), lymphocyte-like cells (CD45+ CD11b- Lin+), along with CD45- EpCAM- host-cell populations. Antibodies included EpCAM (clone G8.8; eBioscience); CD45 (clone 30-F11; Biolegend), F4/80 (clone BM8; Biolegend), CD11c (clone N418; Biolegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4; Biolegend); and CD11b (clone M1/70; BD Biosciences). The lineage (Lin) antibody mix contained anti-CD90.2 (clone 53–2.1), anti-B220 (clone RA3-6B2), anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136), anti-CD49b (clone DX5), anti-Ter119 (cloneTER-119) and anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8) (all BD Biosciences). 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD, Sigma Aldrich) excluded dead cells. VT680 fluorescence was directly assessed using the LSRII flow cytometer, FlowJo v.8.8.7 (Tree Star, Inc.) and MATLAB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Tumor Immunophenotyping by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS analysis was performed using 200-μL tumor or splenocyte single-cell suspensions per antibody panel. Cells were first incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes in PBS with anti-CD16/CD32 Fc block (BD Biosciences) at 1: 100 and live/death staining (Zombie Aqua, BioLegend) at 1: 1,000, or Live/Dead fixable blue dead cell stain (Invitrogen). Next, cells were washed and stained at 4°C for 30 minutes in PBS with antibodies against CD45 (clone 30-F11), B220 (clone RA3–6B2), CD3 (clone 17A2), CD8 (clone 53–6.7), MHC-I (clone AF6–88.5), PD-1 (clone RPM1–30), PD-L1 (clone 10F.9G2), NK1.1 (clone PK136), CD11b (clone M1/70), Ly6G (clone 1A8) and F4/80 (clone BM8), all from BioLegend, at 1 μg/mL. PE-labeled H-2Kb - SIINFEKL pentamer (ProImmune) was used at 2.5 μL per staining. In some sets of experiments, absolute cell numbers were calculated by adding 10 μL counting beads (1 × 106 beads/mL, Spherotech) to each sample before acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analysis of IL-22 and IL-17 Production in ILCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells-depleted splenic cells were cultured with IL-23 (20 ng/ml, Biolegend) with or without butyrate (0.5 mM) for 16 h, and then stimulated with ionomycin (750 ng/ml) and phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml) for 2 h, followed by addition of brefeldin (BD Biosciences) for another 3 h. After Fc blocking, cells were stained with surface markers (PE/Cy7-anti-Thy1, 1:200, Clone#30-H12, Cat#105326; FITC-lineage (CD3, Clone#145-2C11, Cat#100306; CD11b, Clone#M1/70, Cat#101206; CD11c, Clone#N418, Cat#117306; B220, Clone#RA3-6B2, Cat#103206; F4/80, Clone#BM8, Cat#123108; NK1.1, Clone#PK136, Cat#108706; and Gr1, Clone#RB6-8C5, Cat#108419), 1:100), which were purchased from Biolegend. Cells were permeabilized using Foxp3/Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization set (Cat#00-5523-00, ThermoFisher), followed by intracellular staining (anti-IL-22, 1:200, Clone#1H8PWSR, Cat#12-7221-82, Invitrogen; anti-IL-17, 1:200, Clone#TC11-18H10.1, Cat#506916, Biolegend). For ILC3, cells were also stained with RORγt (1:200, Clone#B2D, Cat#17-6981-82, Invitrogen).
All the events were collected by BD FACS Diva software. IL-22 and IL-17 production in ILCs (Thy1+ Lineage cells), or in ILC3 (Thy1+ Lineage RORγt+ cells) was analyzed using FlowJo. Gating strategies are included in Supplementary Fig. 15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD3+ and F4/80+ Cells in Brain Cryosections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were obtained from some of the animals previously used for intravital microscopy. Cryosections of 5 μm of the brain encephalic region were obtained and fixed with ice-cold acetone (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA) for 10 min. The blockage of non-specific binding was made using a goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Newark, NJ, USA) for 20 min. F4/80 clone BM8 and CD3 clone 17A2 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were used in the analysis and were incubated overnight after dilution on PBST. The ImmPRESS® HRP Goat Anti-Rat IgG Polymer Detection Kit with DAB (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to detect the antibodies. The counterstain used was Harris’s Hematoxylin Solution (EasyPath-São Paulo, Brazil) for 1 min. The slides were rinsed with tap water and then dehydrated chemically and mounted with Erv-mount mounting media (EasyPath). The counting of CD3+ and F4/80+ cells was performed manually. Representative images were acquired in Motic Panthera L Microscope Built-in Smart CAM & ImagingOnDevice System (Motic-Xiamen, Xiamen, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of transplanted tumors were obtained by digestion with 1 mg/ml Collagenase I (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche) in RPMI containing 5 % FBS for 45 min at 37°C under shaking condition. The cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm nylon mesh and centrifuged. After red blood cell lysis, Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse FcR antibody (clone 93, Biolegend) for 15 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. Then, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend), CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Biolegend), F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend), PDGFRα (clone APA5; Biolegend), CD206 (clone C068C2, Biolegend), CD11c (clone N418, Biolegend) and MHC II (I-A/I-E, clone M5/114.15.2, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. For analysis of Treg cells in the tumor, cells were stained with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend, 1:100), Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 1:50) antibodies using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit following the instructions (eBioscience). Samples were acquired on a Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood was collected by cardiac puncture after treating mice with 0.25 mg of ketamine and red blood cells were lysed using Vitalyse (Bio E, Inc.). Cells were stained and then fixed using IC fixation buffer (eBioscience). Full spleens were processed into single-cell suspensions and red blood cells were lysed with ACK lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, dissolved in H2O and adjusted to pH 7.2–7.4). Cells were then stained and fixed using IC fixation buffer (eBioscience). The following antibodies were used in an appropriate combination of fluorochromes: CD11b (clone M1/70; BioLegend), CD11c (clone N418; BioLegend), CD45 (clone 30-F11; BD), F4/80 (clone Bm8; BioLegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4; BioLegend), and Ly6G (clone 1A8; BioLegend). Samples were analyzed with a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (Tree Star). Flow cytometry was performed on spleen and blood when mice reached 10 wk of age, collected in five separate sessions, and then pooled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Single-cell Analysis of Macrophage Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single‐cell suspension was derived from the BALF of LysMCre:Shp2fl/fl and Shp2fl/fl mice 24 hour after secondary S aureus infection. After blocking the Fc receptor, cells were stained with CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend, San Diego), F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend) and Dectin‐1 (clone RH1, BioLegend), or their corresponding IgG isotype controls. After extracellular markers were stained, the cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with CD206 (clone C068C2, BioLegend) or its isotype control. Cell samples were detected by CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and FlowJo software (TreeStar, Inc.) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sorting and Sequencing Microglia from Embryonic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following single-cell suspension preparation, cells were pelleted and subsequently stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against CD11b (clone M1/70), CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD45.1 (clone A20), CD45.2 (clone 104), CX3CR1 (clone SA011F11; BioLegend), F4/80 (clone BM8; BioLegend), Ly6C (clone HK1.4), Ly6G (clone 1A8; BioLegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5), CD115 (clone AFS98), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2), CD11c (clone N418), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1; BioLegend), CD86 (clone GL1; BioLegend), Tmem119 (clone 106–6; Abcam), and either DAPI or propium iodide viability dyes (all from eBioscience if not indicated otherwise). Flow cytometry was performed using a Fortessa analyzer (BD Biosciences), and FACS was performed using a FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) or LSRII (BD Biosciences). The gating strategies used for flow cytometry analysis of embryonic tissues are adapted from Hoeffel et al. (2015) (link) and shown in Fig. S5. Resident microglia were sorted as doubletDAPICD11b+CD45int (Fig. S2 B). Flow cytometry data analysis was performed using FlowJo (TreeStar) software. For ULI RNA-seq, microglia were double-sorted to reach a purity of >98%, and 1,000 cells were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!