The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dna blood midi mini kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, United States

The DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit is a laboratory equipment designed for the purification of genomic DNA from small volumes of whole blood samples. It is used to extract and concentrate DNA from biological samples for downstream analysis and applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using dna blood midi mini kit

1

Whole-Exome Sequencing of Genomic DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Firstly, genomic DNA was extracted from 200µL peripheral blood, using a Qiagen DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). About 50 ng of genomic DNA was interrupted to around 200 bp fragments by the enzyme. The DNA fragments were end-repaired by adding one A base at the 3’end.
Secondly, the DNA fragments were ligated with barcoded sequencing adaptors, and ligated fragments (about 320 bp) were collected by XP beads. After PCR amplification, the DNA fragments were hybridized and captured by NanoWES(Berry Genomics, China) according to the manufacturer’s Protocol. The hybrid products were eluted and collected, and then subjected to PCR amplification and purification. Next, the libraries were quantified by qPCR, and size distribution was determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Finally, the Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) with 150 bp pair-end sequencing mode was used for sequencing the genomic DNA samples of the family. Raw image files were processed using CASAVA v1.82 for base calling and generating raw data [8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Profiling in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) histologically confirmed via biopsies at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Jinan, Shandong, China) from September 2017 to December 2019 were assessed. The correctness of the diagnoses was ensured by the pathological confirmation from two experienced pathologists. Strict quality inspection was carried out on the samples, and the contaminated and insufficient DNA samples were removed. Finally, we recruited a cohort of 178 patients. We defined overall survival (OS) as the period from diagnosis to death or the last observation date. The last follow-up was on 26 November, 2020. We have censored the related data if a patient survives at the last follow-up. Clinicopathological data were retrieved from the patients’ medical records. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute. Informed consent was granted from each patient involved in the study. Tumor tissues were subjected to fixation with formalin and embedment in paraffin (FFPE). Their corresponding blood samples were set as controls. Genomic DNA was obtained from each FFPE sample by GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Beverly, MA, USA) and blood sample by the DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Screening for Hearing Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were obtained from the family members and genomic DNA was extracted from the whole blood, according to standard procedures, using a Qiagen DNA Blood Midi/Mini Kit (Qiagen). Prescreening of hotspot mutations in GJB2 (c.35delG, c.176_191del16, c.235delC, c.299‐300delAT), SLC26A4 (c.919‐2A>G, c.1174A>T, c.1226G>A, c.1229C>T, c.1707+5G>A, c.1975G>C, c.2027T>A, c.2168A>G), MTRNR1 (m.1494C>T, m.1555A>G), and GJB3 (c.538C>T) was performed in all probands by microarray (CapitalBio, China; Xiang et al., 2019). Of the blood samples collected from the probands of the 21 deaf families, 12 were analyzed by TGS of 127 deafness‐causing genes (Table S1), six were analyzed by single proband WES, and the remaining three were analyzed by trio‐WES (WES for family proband and parents simultaneously).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SCLC Tumor Tissue and Blood Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We recruited histologically confirmed SCLC patients from SCH. All diagnoses were independently confirmed by two experienced pathologists. In addition to blood samples (2 ml), tumor tissue samples were obtained by biopsies. A strict quality inspection was undertaken to remove contaminated and insufficient DNA samples. Finally, 178 patients were enrolled. The OS was defined as the interval between diagnosis and death/the last observation point. For surviving patients, data were censored at the last follow‐up (26 November 2020). Clinicopathologic data were retrieved. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the SCH. All patients included in this study provided written informed consent.
Biopsied tumor tissues were fixed with formalin, then embedded in paraffin. Corresponding blood samples were set as controls. Genomic DNA was extracted from each FFPE sample using the GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen) and from the blood sample using the DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole Exome Sequencing Protocol for Genetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
gDNA was extracted from the umbilical cord and parental blood using a QIAGEN DNA Blood Midi/Mini Kit. DNA libraries were prepared using an Agilent liquid capture system (Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The size distribution and concentration of the libraries were determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The DNA library was sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 or Illumina Novaseq for paired-end 150 bp-long reads according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The mean sequencing coverage on target regions of whole-exome sequencing was 103-fold. Raw image files were processed using bcl2fastq (Illumina) for base calling and generating raw data. Low-quality sequencing reads were filtered using a quality score of 20 (Q20). The average read depths were 103X for each case. The reads were aligned with the NCBI human reference genome (hg19/GRCh37) using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner. The BAM files were subjected to SNP analysis, duplication marking, indel realignment, and recalibration using GATK and Picard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Extraction from Umbilical Cord and Peripheral Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from umbilical cord blood of the proband and peripheral blood of the family members separately, using a Qiagen DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany, 69,506). NanoDrop spectrophotometer and agarose gel electrophoresis were employed in determining the purity and yield of DNA products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction from Various Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the FFPE samples using the GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, United States), from the fresh tumor tissue samples using AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini (Qiagen, United States), from bulk WBC samples using the DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen, United States), or large DNA fragments (>500 bp) from the hydrothorax samples using the MagMAXTM Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (Life Technology, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, respectively. The quality of purified DNA was assayed by gel electrophoresis and quantified by a Qubit® 4.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mucinous Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Genomic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 96 patients histologically confirmed with mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma (MPA) were recruited from Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (SCH). They were diagnosed with MPA from 14, April 2015 to 19, August 2019, except for one patient who was pathologically confirmed with MPA on 26, December 2013. The last follow-up date was 22, July 2021. All the diagnoses were independently confirmed by two experienced pathologists. All patients in this study provided written informed consent and this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of SCH. It also conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. MPA specimens and attached non-tumor samples were obtained by biopsies. A strict quality inspection was carried out to remove contaminated and insufficient DNA samples. The overall survival (OS) time was defined as the interval between diagnosis and death, or between diagnosis and the last observation point. Clinical pathological data were retrieved from patients’ medical records. Biopsied tumor tissues were fixed with formalin, then embedded in paraffin (FFPE). Corresponding non-tumor samples were set as controls. Genomic DNA was extracted from each FFPE sample using the GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, #180134, USA) and from the blood sample using the DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen, #51185, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Analysis of Tyrosinase Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from amniocytes or peripheral blood using a Qiagen DNA Blood Midi/Mini kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer's protocol. Variant screening of the TYR gene in 12 families (family 1‐10, 19, and 20) was performed with direct Sanger sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were designed by Primer Premier version 5.0 and contained the entire coding regions and the flanking introns of the TYR gene (Table S1). The 20 μL PCR reaction mixture contained 10‐50 ng template DNA, 10 μL Premix EX Taq HS (Takara), and 1 μL of each primer. Touchdown PCR was performed as follows: 95°C for 15 minutes; 11 cycles of 95°C for 45 seconds, 60°C‐0.5°C for 45 seconds, 72°C for 45 seconds; 24 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 54°C for 45 seconds, 72°C for 45 seconds; and 72°C for 7 minutes. The PCR products were sequenced using an ABI 3130 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). DNASTAR Lasergene SeqMan software was used for DNA sequence assembly, and sequences were compared with a wild‐type reference sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Extraction from Blood Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood (for adults) and cord blood (for foetuses) samples (200 µL each) by using the DNA Blood Midi/Minikit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!