The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evos fl auto 2 imaging

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The EVOS FL Auto 2 is a fully automated, high-performance inverted fluorescence imaging system designed for a wide range of cell and tissue imaging applications. It features advanced optics, user-friendly software, and automated functionalities to capture high-quality images and videos with minimal user intervention.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using evos fl auto 2 imaging

1

Histological Analysis of Ocular Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed eyeballs and lacrimal glands were embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm sections using a microtome (Leica RM2245, Leica Biosystems, Heidelberg, Germany). The sections were deparaffinized, hydrated, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (YD Diagnostics Co., Yongin, Korea) The stained slides were observed using the EVOS FL Auto 2 imaging system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UVB-induced oxidative stress in HaCaT cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HaCaT keratinocytes were incubated for 2 h with different concentrations of samples. The cell culture media was withdrawn from the wells, once washed, and then filled with PBS. Wells except the control were exposed to UVB (50 mJ cm−2) by a UVP CL-1000L ultraviolet cross-linker (Upland, CA, USA). Immediately after the irradiation, PBS was withdrawn, once washed, and replaced with serum-free culture media. Intracellular ROS levels were measured after incubating for an hour (DCFH2-DA assay) and cell viability was measured by MTT assay after incubating for 24 h [1 (link)]. SHC4 that indicated superior antioxidant and cytoprotective effects were further verified by DCFH2-DA staining of cells and analysis by fluorescence microscopy (EVOS FL Auto 2 Imaging, ThermoFisher Scientific, CA, USA) and flow cytometry (CytoFLEX, Beckman Coulter, PA, USA) based on methods described in our previous publications [8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated Microscopy Analysis of FUS Aggregates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy images were captured on an EVOS FL Auto 2 imaging system (ThermoFisher) with brightfield and fluorescence imaging using GFP (470 ± 22 nm excitation, 510 ± 42 nm emission) or RFP (531 ± 40 nm excitation, 593 ± 40 nm emission) filter cubes. All images were captured with the EVOS 4× objective (fluorite, PH, long-working distance, 0.13 numerical aperture/10.58 mm working distance). We refined standard aggregation analysis by adding a median size adjustment step, where cellular area and aggregate area were normalized to their respective median area values across the entire experiment (see Supplemental Information). Aggregates of FUS begin to form at 24 h post-transfection, and all images of cells were taken between 24 and 72 h post-transfection. For live cell imaging, cells were incubated in the EVOS environment chamber at 37 °C and 5% CO2 with humidity. Images were captured every 30 min beginning 24 h after the start of transfection for time courses of 18 to 44 h as indicated. Before beginning the time course, culture plates were placed in the environment chamber for 1 h to acclimate before fine-tuning fields of view. Fluorescence per cell and number of aggregates per cell were quantitated using a semi-automated approach in ImageJ (see Supplementary Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intracellular ROS Measurement in Stimulated HDFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HDFs were stimulated in the same way as mentioned above. However, the stimulated cells, after replacing with new media, were incubated for 2 h duration. The fluorescence probe dye DCF-DA that signifies intracellular ROS was treated to the cells and incubated for 20 min. The fluorescence intensity was measured by fluorometry, fluorescence microscopy (EVOS FL Auto 2 Imaging, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), and flow cytometry (CytoFLEX, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). During flow cytometry, cells were harvested by trypsinization before the analysis. FSC vs. SSC gating was applied for eliminating cell debris.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!