The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

86 protocols using cisplatin

1

Generating Dead Cells via Microwave and Cisplatin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dead cells were obtained by the following two treatments:

Microwave (MW) treatment Cells were treated with microwave at 2.45 GHz until it was boiled.

Cisplatin treatment Cisplatin (Wako) was added to the culture and adjusted to a final concentration of 20 μM. According to the report, the survival rate of MCF-7 cells at 20 μM of Cisplatin was estimated to be about 80% [35 (link)]. In this report, the relationship between survival rate and Cisplatin concentration was 85.67% (12 μM) and 76.03% (25 μM) (Figure 1B in reference [35 (link)], not in this paper).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cisplatin Toxicity in Organoid Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Regarding the toxicity analyses, organoids cultured in the “half Matrigel” solution for
14 days were placed in different differentiation media each supplemented with 0, 20, or 30
μM cisplatin (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) for 24, 48, or 144 h
and with 10 μM cisplatin for 24 and 144 h. Exposure to cisplatin at 0, 10, and 20 μM for
144 h was performed several times (n=3 or 4). Exposure to all the other conditions was
performed once, with n=2. To serve as controls, organoids cultured without cisplatin for
the same duration were prepared.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generating Cisplatin-resistant Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cisplatin-resistant TGCT-PDC and NEC8 cells (TGCT-PDC-R and NEC8-R cells, respectively) were generated from the corresponding parental cells by stepwise increase in concentrations of Cisplatin (Wako) for > 4 months, based on the protocol by Tada et al.55 (link). The final maintenance concentrations of Cisplatin were 0.4 µM and 1.0 µM for TGCT-PDC-R and NEC8-R cells, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluation of Cisplatin and Eribulin in cSCC-PDX Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor growth curves of the cSCC-PDX were documented by the dynamic measurement of tumor volume. The tumor volume range of 300–400 mm3 in the tumor-bearing NOD/ShiJic-scidJcl mice was randomly assigned, and a treatment protocol initiated. Each treatment group had a minimum of n = 3 mice per condition. The control (n = 3) mice were intravenously injected with 150 μL of PBS once per week. In the cisplatin group, cisplatin (n = 4, 5 mg/kg, FUJIFILM Wako, Tokyo, Japan) was administered intraperitoneally once per week as described by Lu et al.62 (link). Eribulin (n = 4) was administered intravenously once per week63 (link). The tumor volume was measured twice per week by caliper, and tumor weights were measured at 42 days after treatment initiation. Tumor volume and weight were recorded in a blinded manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Cell Viability and Cisplatin Sensitivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 5 × 103 HLE or 2 × 103 Huh‐7 cells were plated in 0.1 mL DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin‐streptomycin in a 96‐well plate. At the indicated times, MTT assay reagent (Roche) was added to each well according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance at 575 nm and 650 nm (background measurement) was determined using a plate reader (VersaMax ELISA microplate Reader, Molecular Devices). At least three replicate wells were assayed for each condition, and the standard deviation was determined.
For cisplatin sensitivity assay, the cells were treated with siRNA against BEX2, and after two days, cisplatin (Wako) was added at the indicated concentration. The MTT assay was performed four more days later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytotoxic Drug Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and thiabendazole (TBZ) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Camptothecin (CPT), hydroxyurea (HU), doxorubicin and cisplatin were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd (Osaka, Japan). Vorinostat/suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) was synthesized in-house (see Supplementary Materials)69. doxorubicin was dissolved in water, SAHA (refer supplementary procedure) in DMSO, and cisplatin (Wako, Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) in 10% NaCl. All drugs were further diluted with their respective solvents prior to use according to manufacturers’ recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Drug Transport Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcein AM and cyclosporin A were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Rhodamine 123, paclitaxel, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin were purchased from Wako (Tokyo, Japan). Tariquidar was purchased from AdooQ BioScience (Irvine, CA). CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Reagent was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). [125I]-Iodoarylazidoprazosin (IAAP) was obtained from Perkin-Elmer Life Science (Wellesley, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generating Dog BC Organoids for Drug Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate dog BC organoids, cells from urine samples were mixed with Matrigel (BD Bioscience) and cultured with stem cell‐stimulated medium, as described previously.17 Anticancer drugs used were as follows: piroxicam; gemcitabine; vinblastine (Cayman); and cisplatin (WAKO). Antibody sources used were as follows: E‐cadherin (R&D System); CK7; Ki67 (Novus); CK20; UPK3; MMP28; TFPI2; AGPAT4 (Bioss); vimentin (Sigma‐Aldrich); α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA) (DAKO); CK5; CNN3 (GeneTex, Inc.); and CTSE (Bioworld Technology, Inc.). Fluorescent secondary antibodies used were as follows: Alexa Fluor™ 488 donkey anti‐goat IgG; Alexa Fluor 488™ goat anti‐rabbit IgG; Alexa Fluor 488™ goat anti‐mouse IgG; (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.); Biotinylated goat anti‐mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc.). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated anti‐rabbit IgG (Cayman); and HRP‐conjugated anti‐mouse IgG (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Cisplatin, 5-FU, and Imatinib

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloro-platinum(II): CDDP) and 5-FU were purchased from Wako (Osaka, Japan). Imatinib was purchased from Focus Biomolecules (Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Investigating Cisplatin-Induced Oxidative Stress in HT1080 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 was grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution, at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. All reagents were obtained from commercial sources: cisplatin (CDDP), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (WAKO, Osaka, Japan), propyl gallate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and Z-VAD-fmk (peptide institute, Osaka, Japan). The antibodies used were against FLAG (Sigma), LKB1, total AMPKα, caspase-3 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA), phospho-p38 (threonine 180 and tyrosine 182), total p38, phospho-JNK (threonine 183 and tyrosine 185), total JNK, p53 (Cell signaling technology, Danvers, USA), and β-actin (Wako).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!