The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

57 protocols using digoxigenin 11 utp

1

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescence in situ hybridization, RNA antisense probes were labeled with Digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche). Hybridization was performed as described previously [19 (link)]. DNA was counterstained with 5 mg/ml DAPI (Roth).
For whole-mount in situ hybridization, RNA antisense and sense probes were labeled with Digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche). Embryo preparation and hybridization was performed as described previously [20 (link)] using α-Digoxigenin-AP (Roche) and NBT-BCIP solution (Sigma) for detection [21 (link)].
The following probes were used for in situ hybridization: rat Col2a1 [22 (link)], mouse Ihh [23 (link)], mouse Col10a1 [24 (link)] and mouse Atoh8 using a 770 bp fragment corresponding to nucleotides 445–1214 of mouse Atoh8 mRNA subcloned into pDrive.
For measurements, 2 – 6 sections were analyzed per animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Riboprobes for Multi-label In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Riboprobes for ISH were generated from cDNA sequences as follows (NCBI GenBank accession numbers in parenthesis): mouse Pomc, bases 502–1008 (short probe) or bases 1–1008 (long probe; NM_001278584.1); Vglut2, bases 1762–2390 (NM_080853.3); and Gad67, bases 317–892 (NM_008077.4). The Vglut2 and Gad67 plasmid templates are a gift from Dr. Erik Hrabovszky (Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest), the long Pomc template was synthesized by Genscript. For dual-label ISH, the short Pomc probe was labeled with digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche Applied Sciences), and the Vglut2 and Gad67 probes with [35S]-uridine 5’-(α-thio) triphosphate (PerkinElmer). For triple-label ISH, the long Pomc probe was labeled with fluorescein-12-UTP (Roche), the Gad67 probe with digoxigenin-11-UTP, and the Vglut2 probe [35S]-uridine 5’-(α-thio) triphosphate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In situ RNA Hybridization of Wheat WAPO1 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed in situ RNA hybridization following the protocol described previously [21 (link)]. Tissues were obtained from developing spikes of diploid T. monococcum (accession PI 167615) and tetraploid wheat cultivar Kronos. cDNAs obtained from T. monococcum and Kronos were used to amplify WAPO1 genes for the in vitro transcription reaction. We designed wheat A-genome specific primers appended with promoter sequences of T3 and T7 (S1 Table). Probes were synthesized using T3 (sense probe) or T7 (antisense probe) RNA Polymerase (Roche) and labelled with Digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche). The forward primer P3-WM-APO1-T3-F1400 starts 57 bp upstream of the stop codon and two alternative reverse primers P4-WM-APO1-T7-R1649 and P5-WM-APO1-T7-R1843 end in the 3’ UTR and include a total of 266 and 458 bp respectively (S1 Table). The P3-P4 and P3-P5 probes showed the same specificity. The color reaction was stopped at 48 or 72 hours, and images were taken by Nikon Ti Microscope equipped with a DS-Fi2-U3 camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In situ Hybridization for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In situ hybridization was performed as described previously [67] (link). Antisense and sense probes were synthesized with digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche Diagnostics) using T7 and T3 RNA polymerases, respectively. The primers used to amplify the DNA template for the probe synthesis were as follows: ADP1-INSITU-F (5′-ATG TGT AAC CCA TCA ACA ACA-3′) and ADP1-INSITU-R (5′-CGG TTA TGTTAG CAA AGG CAA T-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PLP RNA Probe Synthesis and In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 969 bp probe for proteolipid protein (PLP) was generated using PCR primers from Allen Brain Atlas flanked with T7/T3 (T3 forward, 5′-AATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGGGGGATGCCTGAGAAGGT3′; and T7 reverse, 5′-GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGTGTGATGCTTTCTGCCCA-3′). PCR products were generated using isolated RNA and the SuperScript One-Step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen), re-amplified, and confirmed by sequencing. Probes were then transcribed using the Ambion Maxiscript transcription kit (Invitrogen) and digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche), using either T3 for the sense control probe or T7 for the antisense probe. In situ hybridization was performed according to the published protocol (www.mskcc.org/research/lab/alexandra-joyner/laboratory-protocols). Probes were diluted 1:50 in hybridization solution and hybridized overnight at 55°C–60°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In situ probe generation from hippocampus cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primers were used to create in situ probes using whole hippocampus cDNA as a template: Pafah1b1: forward 5’-AAAATGGTGCTGTCCCAGAG-3’ & reverse 5’-ACACGGAGGGTCTTGTCATC-3’, Med8: forward 5’-GACCTGGCCCTCTGTCCT-3’ & reverse 5’-CTTGCCGAAAGCCTGTGT-3’, Hist1h4j: forward 5’-TCATGTCTGGCAGAGGTAAGG-3’ & 5’-TTGCATCCGAGACAGCATAG-3’. Primers were designed using Primer 3 58 . PCR products were cloned into pCRII-TOPO using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen). Insert sequences were verified with Sanger sequencing. Based on insert orientation, NotI or SpeI restriction endonucleases (NEB) were used to linearize the vector prior to in vitro transcription. Probes were synthesized using digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche) and T7 or SP6 RNA Polymerase (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Template DNA was removed with TURBO DNase (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and In-Situ Hybridization of RNA Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The templates for RNA probes synthesis were amplified by PCR using primers containing T3 or T7 promoter sequence, Anti_RNA-F/Anti_RNA-R for the antisense probe and Sen_RNA-F/Sen_RNA-R for the sense probe. The antisense and sense probes were transcribed from the corresponding template using T7 and T3 RNA polymerase, respectively. Digoxigenin-11-UTP from Roche (Basel, Switzerland) was incorporated in the transcription reaction to label the probes. Whole-mount in-situ hybridization assays of zebrafish embryos and larvae were performed following a previously described protocol [67 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescent Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescent whole mount in situ hybridization (FISH), we followed the protocol outlined in (69 (link)). Triple FISH was performed as described in (70 (link)). Signal was developed with fluorophore-conjugated tyramide (1:400 reagent diluents, Perkin Elmer). Labeled probes were transcribed from linearized DNA using digoxigenin-11-UTP, fluorescein-12-UTP (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), or labeled with DNP (Mirus, Madison, WI, USA) following kit instructions. SpLox, SpBrn1/2/4, SpSoxC, SpPtf1a, and SpMist probes were made as previously published [SpLox (71 (link)), SpBrn1/2/4 (25 (link)), SpSoxC (69 (link)) SpPtf1a, and SpMist (53 (link))]. SpIsl, SpNgn and SpNeuroD probes were synthetized using the following primers: SpIsl-F: 5′-CGTGGACCAGACAGACTTGA-3′; SpIsl-R: 5′-AGTCGCTGAGTGCTTTCCAT-3′; SpNgn-F: 5′-TACGACAATGATGCCCAAGA-3′; SpNgn-R: 5′-CCGTTTCACAAAGCCATTTT-3′; SpNeuroD-F: 5′-CTCGCCACCTGATCTCTAC-3′; SpNeuroD-R: 5′-TTCCCGCCTTTCAAAATATG-3′. SpANP2 probe was made as published in Woods et al. 2018. Templates of all the probes were sequenced prior to probe generation and cloned in the pGEM®-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Samples were imaged with a Zeiss 510 Meta confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Hox Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fragments of each Hox gene were amplified from cDNA libraries from mixed larval and adult tissues using gene-specific primers (provided in Additional file 1: Table S2) designed in MacVector 11.0.4 based on the sequences found in the transcriptome. PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega, USA) and then transformed into competent Escherichia coli cells. Plasmid DNA was isolated and sequenced in both forward and reverse directions using T7 and SP6 primers. Labeled antisense RNA probes were transcribed from linearized DNA using digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Situ Hybridization Protocols for Diverse Organisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were manually collected, fixed, and processed for in situ hybridization as described [79 (link),80 (link)]. Labeled antisense RNA probes were transcribed from linearized DNA using digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or labeled with DNP (Mirus Bio, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For I. pulchra and M. stichopi, colorimetric WMISH was performed according to the protocol outlined in [79 (link)]. For N. vectensis, we followed the protocol described by [81 ]. Double fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed as the colorimetric WMISH with the following modifications: after the posthybridization steps, animals were incubated overnight with peroxidase-conjugated antibodies at 4 °C (anti-DIG-POD [Roche, Basel, Switzerland], 1:500 dilution, and anti-DNP [Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA], 1:200 dilution) followed by the amplification of the signal with fluorophore-conjugated tyramides (1:100 TSA reagent diluents [Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA] TSA Plus Cy3 or Cy5 Kit). Residual enzyme activity was inhibited via 45-minute incubation in 0.1% hydrogen peroxide in PTW followed by four PTW washes prior to addition and development of the second peroxidase-conjugated antibody [82 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!