The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using nanoacquity ultra high pressure lc system

1

SEC-based Protein Separation by LC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEC experiments were performed using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 1 μg of total protein was injected onto a PolyHYDROXYETHYL A column (PolyHEA) (PolyLC Inc), 2.1 mm internal diameter, 100 mm length, 5 μm particle size, and 200 Å pore size. Protein samples were separated isocratically with with 200 mM ammonium acetate solution at a flow rate of 28 μL/min for 10 min with a ‘divert to waste’ step programmed at 7 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Top-down RPLC-MS/MS Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Top-down RPLC-MS/MS was carried out by either using an Acquity ultra-high pressure LC M-class system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) or by using a nanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 600 ng of total protein was injected onto a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S) (Agilent Technologies), 10-μm particle size, 500-μm inner diameter, 1,000 Å pore size using an organic gradient of 20 to 65% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.2% FA in H2O; mobile phase B: 0.2% FA in 50:50 acetonitrile/isopropanol) at a constant flow rate of 12 μL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying sarcomeric protein abundances in hPSC-CMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sarcomeric proteins were enriched from freshly isolated hPSC-CMs from monolayer or ECT culture. Liquid chromatography (LC)-MS analysis was carried out using a NanoAcquity Ultra-high Pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). Mass spectra were collected at a scan rate of 0.5 Hz over the 500–2000 m/z range. All top-down LC-MS data were processed and analyzed using the DataAnalysis v4.3 for protein quantification. For a specific protein isoform, the most abundant 3–5 charge state ions were selected for generating an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC). The area under curve (AUC) of the EIC of a specific protein isoform represents its abundance. Relative quantification of protein PTMs were performed as reported previously.20 (link)–22 All comparisons drawn between early- and late-stage hPSC-CMs were from the same differentiation batch.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Top-down LC-MS/MS Protein Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Top-down LC-MS/MS was carried out by using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 5 μL (400 ng) of total protein was injected onto a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S) (Agilent Technologies), 10-μm particle size, 500-μm inner diameter, 1,000 Å pore size) using an organic gradient of 5 to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.2% formic acid in water; mobile phase B: 0.2% formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile:isoproponal) at a flow rate of 12 μL/min and temperature of 35 °C. Column pressure was maintained between 700–1200 psi. Mass spectra were taken at a scan rate of 0.5 Hz over 530–2000 m/z range. A total of three replicate runs were collected for each concentration between 250–1200 ng to establish instrument sensitivity and reproducibility. Samples were randomized during processing and LC-MS/MS analysis to correct for batch effects.38 Data-dependent LC-MS/MS was performed on sarcomeric protein extracts. The three most intense ions in each mass spectrum were selected and fragmented by collision-activated dissociation (CAD) with a scan rate of 2 Hz from 200–3000 m/z. The isolation window for online AutoMS/MS CAD was 10 m/z. The collision DC bias was set from 18 to 35 eV for CAD with nitrogen as the collision gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intact Protein Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analysis was accomplished using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). 400 ng of total sarcomeric protein was separated by reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) on a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S, 1000 Å pore size, 10μm particle size, 500 μm inner diameter) using an organic gradient of 5% to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid (FA) in water; mobile phase B: 0.1% FA in 50:50 acetonitrile:ethanol) at a constant flow rate of 6 μL/min to acquire intact protein spectra. Data analysis was performed using Bruker DataAnalysis (v4.3) and Mash Explorer [15 (link)]. Statistical analysis was performed using “rstatix” in R (v4.1.0). Ions used for quantification are available in Table S2, and statistical analyses are available in Table S3 and S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Top-down Proteoform Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analysis was carried out using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) (67 (link)). Five hundred nanograms of total sarcomeric protein (per sample) were separated using a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S, 1,000 Å pore size, 10-µm particle size, 500-µm inner diameter) using an organic gradient of 5 to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; mobile phase B: 0.1% formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile:ethanol) at a constant flow rate of 14 µL/min. Individual protein fractions were collected following reversed-phase LC separation for ultrahigh-resolution top-down MS using a 7-T linear ion trap (LTQ)/FTICR mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) or 12-T solariX FTICR mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) equipped with an automated chip-based nano electrospray ionization source (Triversa NanoMate; Advion Bioscience). Proteoforms of interest were first isolated in the gas phase and fragmented by ECD and CAD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Top-down Proteomics by RPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Top-down RPLC-MS/MS was carried out by either using an Acquity ultra-high pressure LC M-class system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) or by using a nanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 600 ng of total protein (n = 3) was injected onto a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S) (Agilent Technologies), 10-µm particle size, 500-µm inner diameter, 1,000 Å pore size using an organic gradient of 20 to 65% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.2% FA in H2O; mobile phase B: 0.2% FA in 50:50 acetonitrile/isopropanol) at a constant flow rate of 12 μL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Resolution SEC-MS Protein Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEC experiments were performed using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 1 µg of total protein (n = 3) was injected onto a PolyHYDROXYETHYL A column (PolyHEA) (PolyLC Inc), 2.1 mm internal diameter, 100 mm length, 5 µm particle size, and 200 Å pore size. Protein samples were separated isocratically with 200 mM ammonium acetate solution at a flow rate of 28 µL/min for 10 min with a ‘divert to waste’ step programmed at 7 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Reproducible Protein Identification by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analysis was carried out using a NanoAcquity Ultra-high Pressure LC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II quadrupole time-of- flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). To evaluate the reproducibility of protein extraction and the LC-MS method, three extraction replicates at the same time point (time 0) and three injection replicates of the same protein extract were tested. The sarcomeric proteins in each sample were eluted by a gradient of 5% to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; mobile phase B: 0.1 % formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile:ethanol) at a constant flow rate of 8 μL/min. Proteins eluted were delivered to the mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization. End plate offset and capillary voltage were 450 V and 4000 V, respectively. Nebulizer pressure was set to 0.5 Bar and dry gas flow rate was 4.0 L/min. In-source collisional energy was set to 10 V. Mass spectra were collected at a scan rate of 0.5 Hz over 500–2000 m/z range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!