The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ultimate 3000 rslcnano uplc system

1

High-Sensitivity LC-MS/MS Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BioID2 samples were resuspended with 20 μL 0.1% formic acid, 1 mL out of 20 mL was injected for LC-MS/MS analysis. Liquid chromatography was conducted using a home-made trap-column (5 cm × 200 mm inner diameter) and a home-made analytical column (50 cm × 50 mm inner diameter) packed with Reprosil-Pur 120 C18-AQ 5 μm particles (Dr Maisch), running a 3-hreversed-phase gradient at 70 nL/min on a Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 RSLCNano UPLC system coupled to a Thermo QExactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A parent ion scan was performed using a resolving power of 120,000 and then up to the 30 most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS (minimum ion counts of 1000 for activation), using higher energy collision-induced dissociation fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion was activated such that MS/MS of the same m/z (within a range of 10 ppm; exclusion list size = 500) detected twice within 5 s were excluded from analysis for 50 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proteomics Analysis of Pea Seed Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of homogenized seeds (approximately 100 mg of homogenized tissue per biological replicate) were extracted for omics analyses as described previously [35 (link),44 (link),45 (link),46 (link)], and portions of samples corresponding to 5 µg of peptide were analyzed by nanoflow reverse-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using a 15 cm C18 Zorbax column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-UPLC system, and the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer equipped with a FAIMS Pro Interface (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were analyzed using FAIMS compensation voltages of −40, −50, and −75 V, and a pooled sample was screened across compensation voltages using a 5 V step gradient. The measured spectra were recalibrated, filtered (precursor mass—350–5000 Da; S/N threshold—1.5), and searched against the P. sativum protein database (GCA_900700895, [47 (link)]) and common contaminants databases using Proteome Discoverer 2.5 (Thermo, algorithms SEQUEST and MS Amanda [48 (link)]). The quantitative differences were determined by Minora, employing precursor ion quantification followed by normalization (total area) and calculation of relative peptide/protein abundances.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Protein Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 μg of each fraction was injected for LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis using a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an EASY Spray Source and connected to an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nanoUPLC system (Thermo Scientific), as previously described [30 (link)]. Peptide separation was performed using an EASY-Spray C18 reversed-phase nano LC column (length, 50 cm; inner diameter, 75 μm; particle size, 3 μm; pore size, 100 Å; Thermo Scientific) at 55 °C and a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Peptides were separated using a binary solvent system consisting of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (FA), 2% (v/v) acetonitrile (ACN) (solvent A) and 98% ACN (v/v), 0.1% (v/v) FA (solvent B) and eluted with a gradient of 4–26% B in 91 min, 26–95% B in 9 min. Subsequently, the analytical column was washed with 95% B for 5 min before re-equilibration with 4% B. Data dependent acquisition using a top 17 method was used, with an isolation window of 1.6 m/z and dynamic exclusion time of 45 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Peptide Identification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BioID2 samples were resuspended with 20 µL 0.1% formic acid, 1 mL out of 20 mL was injected for LC-MS/MS analysis. Liquid chromatography was conducted using a home-made trap-column (5 cm × 200 mm inner diameter) and a home-made analytical column (50 cm × 50 mm inner diameter) packed with Reprosil-Pur 120 C18-AQ 5 µm particles (Dr Maisch), running a 3-hreversed-phase gradient at 70 nL/min on a Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 RSLCNano UPLC system coupled to a Thermo QExactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A parent ion scan was performed using a resolving power of 120,000 and then up to the 30 most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS (minimum ion counts of 1000 for activation), using higher energy collision-induced dissociation fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion was activated such that MS/MS of the same m/z (within a range of 10 ppm; exclusion list size = 500) detected twice within 5 s were excluded from analysis for 50 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Resolution Nano-LC-MS Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano UPLC system coupled to the nanospray ion source containing a capillary column (75 μm ID, 15 cm length, 10 μm orifice) created by hand packing a commercially available fused-silica emitter (New Objective, Woburn, MA) with XBridge BEH C18 (5 μm particle size, 130 Å pore size) stationary phase (Waters, Milford, MA). The LC solvents were: (A) 0.05% CH3COOH in H2O and (B) CH3CN. Three μL injections were performed and the initial flow rate and composition of 5% B and 600nl/min was held for 10 min to push sample out of the 5 μL autosampler loop, followed by switching the injection valve from the inject to load position to take the loop out of the flow path, and a decrease of the flow rate to 300 nL/min over the course of 1 min. This was followed by a linear gradient of the B composition over 6.5 min to 61.5% B at which point the flow rate was decreased to 150 nL/min and held at 61.5% B for 2 min. The column was re-equilibrated between injections at the initial conditions for 9 min. To assure maximum capture of the 3 μL injection from the 3 μL sample volume, the sampler sample height was set to 0.0 mm in the Xcalibur method and the sample container height offset was set to 0.0 mm in the DCMSLink Chromeleon Xpress UPLC control software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SILAC-based Quantitative Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One forward and two reverse SILAC (stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) experiments were conducted [12 (link)]. The lysates of heavy-labeled ALKBH4-knockout cells and light-labeled parental HEK293T cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio (by mass, based on quantification using the Bradford assay) in the forward labeling experiment. The reverse labeling experiment was performed in the opposite way. The lysate mixtures were subsequently loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and ran at 80 V for 2 h. The gel lanes were cut into 10 slices based on apparent molecular weights of proteins, and these gel slices were cut into ~1 mm3 cubes. Proteins were digested in-gel, at 37°C overnight, with MS-grade trypsin (Pierce) at an enzyme/substrate ratio of 1:100 in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate in H2O/CH3CN (9/1 v/v) [13 (link)]. After elution from the gel, the peptide fractions were dried in a Speed-vac and desalted with OMIX C18 Tips (Agilent Technologies). The samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS in a DDA mode on a Q Exactive Plus hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, CA) coupled with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano UPLC system. Maxquant, Version 1.5.2.834, was utilized to identify the light- and heavy-labeled peptides and quantify their intensity ratios, and UniProt database (UP000005640) was used for the database search.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Analysis of Desulfitobacterium reducens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each SAX fraction was resuspended in 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% FA for LC-MS/MS injections and then loaded on the same pre-column and separated on the same C18 tip-capillary column as for the protoplast formation samples. MS/MS data was acquired in data-dependent mode (over a 4 h acetonitrile 2–42% gradient) on an Orbitrap Q exactive Mass spectrometer equipped with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano UPLC system and custom made nanoESI source. Acquired RAW files were processed using MaxQuant version 1.3.0.5 (Cox et al., 2009 (link)) and its internal search engine Andromeda (Cox et al., 2011 (link)). MS/MS spectra were searched against the predicted D. reducens proteome. MaxQuant default identification settings were used in combination with dimethyl-labeling parameters. Search results were filtered with a false-discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01. Known contaminants and reverse hits were removed before statistical analysis. Relative quantification between different conditions was obtained by calculating the significance B-values for each of the identified proteins using Perseus (Table SI-1) (Cox et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Analysis by Nano-UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were resuspended in 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% FA and analysed on a Lumos Fusion Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer online connected to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano UPLC system. A capillary precolumn (Acclaim Pepmap C18, 3 μm 100 Å, 2 cm × 75 μm inner diameter) was used for sample trapping and cleaning. Analytical separations were performed at 250 nl min−1 over 150-min biphasic gradients on a 50-cm-long in-house packed capillary column (75 μm inner diameter, ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ 1.9 μm silica beads, Dr. Maisch). Acquisitions were performed through the top speed data-dependent acquisition mode using a 3 s cycle time. First MS scans were acquired at a resolution of 120,000 (at 200 m/z) and the most intense parent ions were selected and fragmented by high energy collision dissociation (HCD) with a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 37.5% using an isolation window of 0.7 m/z. Fragmented ion scans were acquired with a resolution of 50,000 (at 200 m/z) and selected ions were then excluded for the following 120s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!