The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gf f membrane

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United States

The GF/F membrane is a laboratory filtration product designed for the separation and retention of particulate matter. It is a glass fiber-based membrane with high flow rates and outstanding retention capabilities. The GF/F membrane provides efficient filtration without the need for interpretation or extrapolation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using gf f membrane

1

Spatial Distribution of Nitrate in the NSCS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A sampling cruise was carried out in the summer (June) of 2017. Twenty-seven sampling stations were visited in five representative transects (A, B, C, D, and E) to investigate the spatial distribution of NO3- and its dual isotopic composition within the NSCS; the sampling sites are presented in Fig 1. No specific permissions were required for the sampling area, because the sampling area did not belong to the nature reserve and not involve endangered or protected species.
At each site, water samples were collected from various depths (2m, 25m, 50m, 75m, 100m, including surface, middle and bottom water) in the water column in 12 L Niskin bottles with a conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) metre (SBE911, Seabird). Samples for chlorophyll a (Chl-a) were filtered using glass-fibre filters (Whatman, 0.7 μm, GF/F) and stored at -20 °C before analysis. For nutrients and the dual isotopic NO3- analysis, water samples of 500 ml were filtered through pre-combustion (450 °C, 4 h) GF/F membranes (47 mm diameter, Whatman), and the filtrate was placed into an acid-washed polyethylene bottle and stored at -20 °C for home lab analysis. This study did not make any damage to the endangered or protected species. This study was carried out without any ethics problem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Culturing Harmful Algae M. polykrikoides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The algal culture of M. polykrikoides (EAr) was obtained from the Department of Biotechnology at Sangmyung University (Seoul, Korea). The cultures were maintained in f/2 medium at 20 °C ± 1 °C under a light intensity of 65 µmol·Em−2·s−1 on a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. The f/2 medium was prepared as described in [65 (link),66 ]. All seawater at a salinity of 31–33 psu was filtered through GF/F membranes (Whatman, Little Chalfont, UK) and then autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min. Strains were subcultured with fresh f/2 medium at 20 day intervals to maintain healthy cultures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Seawater Nutrients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-liter seawater samples were collected in parallel, filtered through filters (47 mm, Whatman GF/F nominal pore size, Maidstone, United Kingdom), and frozen at −20°C until analysis. The concentrations of total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), NO3, and NH4+ were determined using the Cu–Cd column reduction and indophenol blue color formation methods, respectively (Science et al., 1999 ). The analysis of NO2 was based on the reaction of an aromatic amine with NO2; the reaction product was quantified using spectrophotometric methods (Science et al., 1999 ). PO43– was measured by a modified single-solution method (Murphy and Riley, 2014 ). The amount of total organic carbon (TOC) was measured using the standard methods (Clescerl, 1998 ). Chl a on the filter (47 mm, GF/F membranes, Whatman) from 500 ml of seawater was extracted using 10 ml of 90% (v/v) acetone at 4°C in the dark for 24 h, and the extractions were analyzed using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-4500, Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) after centrifugation, according to the procedure of a previous study (Parsons et al., 1984 (link)). After the frozen samples were thawed, SiO32– concentrations were determined by a nutrient analyzer (Lachat Quickchem 8500, United States) according to the standard manual (Zhou et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Seasonal Zooplankton Sampling in SYS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sampling was carried out by performing three surveys of the SYS (33–36 °N, 120–124 °E) in 2018 onboard R/V KEXUESANHAO for 11, 16, and 16 sampling sites on April 18 to 22 (spring), August 29 to September 6 (summer), and November 19 to 27 (autumn), respectively (Fig. 1).
Zooplankton samples were collected by vertical tows using a WP2 plankton net (mouth area: 0.25 m2, mesh size: 200 μm) from about 3 m above the bottom to the surface. The collected samples were stored in formalin–seawater solution with a final concentration of 5%. Preserved samples were examined by stereoscopic microscope (SZM-LED2, OPTIKA) to identify the zooplankton community morphologically. In situ temperature and salinity were obtained using a shipboard rosette-mounted Conductivity-Temperature-Depth casts (CTD, Sea Bird 911) with the probe of temperature and conductivity, respectively. About 500 ml seawater was collected from surface and bottom layers, respectively, for chlorophyll a (Chl a) measurement. Seawater was filtered through GF/F membrane (Whatman) and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. Chl a concentration was determined in the laboratory using a UV fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-4500, Hitachi, Japan) after extraction with 90% acetone for 24 h under 4 °C (Shi et al. 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chlorophyll a Determination in Phytoplankton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Withdrawn cell suspensions (5 mL) were filtered through a Whatman GF/F membrane. Pigments were extracted in a 10 mL tube with 80% chilled acetone and kept in darkness for 12 h. Then, the tubes were centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min at 6000× g. The optical densities of the extracts at 646, 663 and 750 nm were determined using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (UV-1700, Shimadzu). The concentration of Chl a was calculated according to the method from Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chlorophyll a Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Triplicate samples of 200–300 mL were filtered through 20 (nylon, Millipore), 2 (polycarbonate, Whatman) and 0.2 (polycarbonate, Whatman) μm aperture sized membranes in time series, and total Chl a concentrations were calculated by combining size-separated Chl a concentrations for the 20 L incubation systems, and 100–150 mL were filtered through a GF/F membrane (Whatman) to measure total Chl a for the 2 L incubation systems. The pigments on the membranes were extracted with 90% acetone at -20 °C for 20 h in the dark. The extract was used for measuring Chl a using a 7200-000 Trilogy fluorometer (Turner Designs)47 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenol Degradation in Algal Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of dissolved phenol was determined every two days after filtration (using GF/F membrane, Whatman) based on the standard method [26 (link)]. Phenol concentrations were measured via a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2450, Japan) after chloroform extraction. The absorbance of the colored complex of phenol with 4- amino antipyrine was detected at 460 nm [26 (link)]. Moreover, to detect the abiotic degradation of phenol during the experiment, a blank control (BG11 medium with phenol and without algal cells) was designed to measure the concentration of phenol every two days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Coastal Mesocosm Carbon Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TOC and DOC were determined using a Shimadzu TOC-L analyzer (Xu et al., 2011b (link)). For POC analysis, water sample was filtered through a pre-combusted GF/F membrane (0.7 μm, Whatman, United States), and then quantified using a Perkin Elmer Series II CHNS 2400 analyzer, after HCl-fuming to remove the carbonates. Acetanilide (71.09%) was used as the analytical standard (Xu et al., 2011a (link)). Samples from the offshore mesocosm were limited, therefore only samples from the coastal mesocosm were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolic Profiling of Microalgae under Oil Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Dunaliella tertiolecta culture was exposed to Control (f/2 medium) and WAF at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells · mL−1 in batch culture for a period of 48 h in triplicates. The role of Kreb's cycle on metabolism during oil exposure was confirmed through determination of respiration rates after 48 h time point. Respiration rates were measured using a Clark‐type oxygen electrode (Hansatech, Norfolk, UK), as per methods described in Kamalanathan et al. (2015 , 2021a (link)). Further confirmation of the upregulation of Kreb's/tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle was confirmed by measuring the concentration of cycle metabolites and rates of respiration. Briefly, cells of D. tertiolecta were collected after 48 h incubation in the Control and WAF treatment. For measuring the concentration of metabolites in the cells, 400 mL of cultures were filtered through GF/F membrane (0.7 μm, Whatman, United States) and 0.5 ppm of 13C‐citrate was added to the tubes as an internal standard and the metabolites were extracted using chilled 100% methanol. The methanol extract was then analyzed on LC–MS/MS for organic acid analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Viral RNA Extraction from Aquatic Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples were treated with methods described by Maunula et al. (2012) with some modifications. In general, 5 l of the seawater samples were prefiltered through a Waterra ® filter (FHT-700) (Powell et al. 2000) , but in some cases, only 1 or 3 l could pass through the filter. Filtering was continued through a GF/F membrane (Whatman International). Virus particles were eluted from the Waterra filter using 50 ml of 50 mM glycine-3% beef extract (pH 9.5) and from the GF/F membrane with 1 ml AVL lysis buffer (Qiagen) after shaking for 10 min at room temperature. Both eluates were subjected to RNA extraction with a Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). Aquarium water from the infection trials and the liquid waste samples were not filtered. For determining the presence of VHSV, 140 µl of each sample were collected for RNA extraction with a Qiagen Viral RNA Mini Kit. Sediment samples were diluted by taking 5 g of each sample and adding 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. Suspensions were briefly stirred, and 200 µl of the liquid were taken for RNA extraction, which was performed using a Nu clisens magnetic extraction kit (Biomérieux). RNA was analysed using qRT-PCR both undiluted and in 1:10 dilution (RNase-free water).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!