The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mixed cellulose ester membrane filter

Manufactured by Advantec
Sourced in Japan

The mixed cellulose ester membrane filter is a versatile laboratory filtration product. It is composed of a combination of cellulose esters, providing a durable and reliable filtration medium. The membrane filter is designed to efficiently separate and retain particulates, microorganisms, and other suspended matter from liquid samples during various analytical and purification processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using mixed cellulose ester membrane filter

1

Virus Extraction from Clinical and Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each clinical specimen, phosphate-buffered saline was added to obtain a 10% (w/v) suspension, which was centrifuged at 4000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant fluid was used to extract viral nucleic acid.
For each water sample (800 ml), MgCl 2 was added to a final concentration of 0•05 M, and pH was adjusted to 3•5 by HCl. Then, water samples were filtered through a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (pore size 0•45 µm, Advantec, Japan). Ten millilitres of 3% beef extract solution (pH 9•0) was used to elute viruses from the membranes by ultrasonication for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Conjugation Transfer Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Filter mating assays were carried out employing a donor to recipient ratio equal to 1∶10. Stationary phase cultures of the donor (S. Enteritidis ROD21::aph, S. Typhimurium ROD21::aph trg::mudQ pSLT+ or S. Typhimurium ROD21::aph trg::mudQ pSLT) and recipient (S. Enteritidis ΔROD21 putAP::cat, S. Typhimurium 14028s putAP::cat, S. Typhimurium phoN::dhfr pSLT+, S. Typhimurium phoN::dhfr pSLT, E. coli H10407 putAP::cat, E. coli EDL933 putAP::cat or E. coli DH5α NalR) bacteria were mixed in LB medium (0.5 mL of the donor and 4.5 mL of the recipient) and then collected on a 0.2 µm pore size mixed cellulose/ester membrane filter (Advantec). The filter was placed with bacteria side down on a LB agar plate and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Bacterial cells were harvested from the filter and resuspended to a final volume of 1 mL in LB and seeded on LB agar plates containing the respective antibiotics for selection. Transconjugants were selected with kanamycin and chloramphenicol or kanamycin and nalidixic acid. Transfer frequency measurements were obtained by dividing the number of transconjugants by the viable counts of donor cells in the mating mixture, determined at the end of the mating assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optical Properties of CNF Composite Sheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of miscibility and porosity of the sheet on the optical properties of the composite, the dried sheets were prepared using the U-CNF, and solvent-exchanged wet sheets were prepared using both the U-CNF and CM-CNF suspensions, respectively. For the dried CNF sheet, 0.5% CNF suspension was de-watered on a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (Advantec, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) by vacuum filtration. After filtration, the sheet was pressed under a pressure of 30 bar for 5 min and hot-pressed at 105 °C and 25 bar for 15 min. For solvent-exchanged sheets, 0.5% suspension was filtrated by vacuum, and the wet sheet was pressed at 30 bar for 10 s. The sheet was then immersed in an ethanol solvent for more than 12 h. The solvent-exchanged sheet was pressed for 10 s, and then used for composite preparation without drying. To investigate the effect of sheet grammage on the properties of the composite, solvent-exchanged CM-CNF (550 μmol/g) sheets were prepared with grammage values of 20, 30, and 40 g/m2, respectively, by adjusting the amount of CM-CNF suspension.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Waterborne Pathogen Monitoring in West Lake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the period between June and October, which was the high-occurrence season for waterborne cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis26 (link),27 (link),47 ,48 , water samples were collected from 4 sampling sties (as shown in Fig. 1) at ten-day intervals and a total of 52 samples were obtained. The sampling site 1# is close to the zoo in the south of the West lake and site 4# in the north, site 2# is located in the swimming area in the East lake and site 3# is near the cruise ship terminal. Each sample was collected using a 20-L plastic container. After collection, the samples were transported on ice to the laboratory immediately and parasitic pathogens in the samples were concentrated by a membrane filter dissolution method described previously49 (link). Briefly, water samples were filtered and then the mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (diameter, 142 mm; pore size, 1 μM; Advantec MFS, Inc. Japan) was dissolved in acetone solutions, followed by centrifugation at 1,050 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The packed pellets were resuspended in a suitable volume (2–10 mL) of distilled water. Half of the resuspension from each sample was used for protozoan enumeration and the other half for DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sewage Virus Concentration Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sewage samples were concentrated 80-fold via the membrane adsorption and elution
method as described previously14 (link)15 (link)16 (link). Briefly,
800 ml of the sewage was centrifuged at
3200 × g for 30 min
at 4 °C. MgCl2 solution (2.5 M)
was added to the supernatant to a final concentration of 0.05 M, and
the pH was adjusted to 3.5 with hydrochloric acid (0.5 M). The
solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm mixed cellulose
ester membrane filter (ADVANTEC). Subsequently, the membrane was cut into small
pieces and absorbents on the membrane were eluted with addition of
10 ml 3% beef extract solution followed by ultrasonication for
3 min. After centrifuge at 3
000 × g for 30 min,
the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter
and was ready for RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Concentration of Sewage Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sewage samples were concentrated by adsorption-elution method as described previously20 (link). Briefly, the raw sewage was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. MgCl2 was added to the 800 ml of the supernatant to a final concentration of 0.05 M, and the pH value was adjusted to 3.5 by hydrochloric acid. Then the supernatant was filtered through a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (pore size of 0.45 μm, ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan). The membranes were eluted with 10 ml 3% beef extract solution (pH value, 9.0) by ultrasonication for 5 min. The eluted solution was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (PALL, Ann Arbor, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Inhibiting Acid-Fast Bacteria Contamination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm whether incubation with EB can inhibit acid-fast bacteria contamination on membrane filters, we used GVPC agar plates supplemented with EB. GVPC agar plates containing 100 µg/mL of EB were prepared. Bathwater samples were examined; 50 mL of acid-phosphate buffer was added to 50 mL of bathwater. After 10 min, the bathwater-acid-phosphate buffer sample was filtered through a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm (ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan) . After filtering the were filtered through a cellulose acetate membrane filter with pore size of 0.2 µm for sterilization. ETH was dissolved in ethanol. et al., 2004 ) at a concentration of 30 mg/mL (as ethambutol dihydrochloride) . Cell suspensions of L. pneumophila (10 3 CFU/mL) and Mycobacterium spp. (10 6 CFU/ mL) were mixed, and an equal volume of EB-acid-phosphate buffer was added. After 5 min, 0.2 mL of the mixture was inoculated on a GVPC agar plate (where the final concentration of EB in the agar plates was approximately 160 µg/mL) and incubated at 36℃ for 6 d. The agar plates were visually observed for the growth of Mycobacterium spp. and L. pneumophila, and the colonies were enumerated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Concentrating Viruses from Sewage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An adsorption-elution method was used to concentrate viruses from sewage samples as described previously [14 (link)]. Briefly, sewage sample (1 L) was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. MgCl2 (2.5 mol l−1) was added to the supernatant to a final concentration of 0.05 mol l−1, and the pH was adjusted to 3.5 by hydrochloric acid (0.5 mol l−1). After filtered through a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (0.45 μm, ADVANTEC, Tokyo, Japan), the membranes were cut into pieces. The viruses were eluted from the membranes, using 10 ml of a 3 % beef extract solution (pH = 9), followed by ultrasonication for 5 min. The eluted solution was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (PALL, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) prior to RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Trace Lithium Analysis in Aqueous Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of trace lithium in the aqueous solutions were performed using a Micro Emission (Japan) Model MH-5000 liquid-electrode-plasma atomic-emission-spectrometer (LEP-AES) equipped with a LepiCuve-02 cuvette or using a Hitachi (Japan) Model Z-5010 polarized Zeeman GF-AAS with a pyro cuvette. The instrumental conditions for LEP-AES were as follows: analytical wavelength, 670 nm; injection volume, 40 μL; applied voltage, 950 V; pulse duration, 3 ms; pulse interval, 2 ms; and 10 integrations. The instrumental conditions for GF-AAS were as follows: analytical wavelength, 670.8 nm; sample Centrifugation was performed using a Kubota (Japan) centrifuge (Type 5420) or a Kokusan (Japan) centrifuge (Type H-80R). UV spectra were measured using a spectrophotometer by Shimadzu (Japan), Model UV-2450, with a 1 cm quartz cell.
Seawater was filtered using a mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (0.45 μm pore size) from Advantec Toyo (Japan). For the entire sample-preparation process, a 50 mL plastic centrifuge tube (As One, Japan) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Water Quality Characterization through Multiparameter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentration of the dissolved oxygen was measured using the method of Winkler as described previously [94 ]. Organic matter, total P and total N were determined in unfiltered water. Si, PO43−, NO3, NO2 and NH4+ were analysed in water samples filtered through mixed cellulose ester membrane filters (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan), with a pore diameter 0.45 μm. Concentration of the nutrients was determined using a spectrophotometer UNICO-2100 (Dayton, NJ, USA) according to [138 ]: PO43− was identified by the Denigès–Atkins method in modification with tin chloride, NH4+ was detected by the indophenol method [139 (link)] and silica with a method based on measuring the intensity of the yellow colour accompanying the formation of the silicomolybdic acid complex. NO3 and NO2 concentration was measured by high performance liquid chromatography (EcoNova, Novosibirsk, Russia) with UV detection on an inverse-phase column modified with octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide [94 ,95 (link)]. Total N and P were measured spectrophotometrically after oxidation with persulfate. Permanganate oxidation index [140 ] and bichromate oxidation demand were used to assess organic substances content [141 (link)]. Chlorophyll a concentration was determined as described previously [66 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!