The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

0.45 μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane

Manufactured by GE Healthcare

The 0.45-μm-pore-size nitrocellulose membrane is a filtration product designed for laboratory applications. It features a pore size of 0.45 microns, making it suitable for the filtration and separation of particles, macromolecules, and other materials within liquid samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using 0.45 μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane

1

Quantifying Tight Junction Proteins in Caco-2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caco-2 cells were
carefully removed from the membranes with 100 μL of protein
extraction buffer (0.1% Triton-X) by repeatedly pipetting up and down.
The cell suspension was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, 4 °C
for 10 min, and the lysate was transferred to a clean new tube. The
protein concentration in each sample lysate was measured using a NanoDrop
UV–vis spectrophotometer at 280 nm. The same amount of each
sample was removed, mixed with 6× loading buffer, and denatured
at 100 °C for 5 min before applying to a gradient (10–15%)
SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were then transferred to a 0.45 μm pore
size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) before blotting for different
tight junction proteins. The SignalFire ECL reagent (Cell Signaling
Technology) was used to detect the protein bands, and the bands were
visualized with the Amersham Imager (GE Life Sciences). Anti-E-cadherin,
anticlaudin-2, antitricellulin, and antibeta-actin (Cell Signaling
Technology) antibodies were used to detect the respective proteins.
All antibodies were purchased from Life Technologies unless otherwise
stated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein and LPS Analysis of Bacterial OMVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated OMVs or whole cells were mixed with sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970 (link)), and samples were boiled for 5 min. For analysis of LPS, whole-cell lysates were treated with 50 µg/mL of proteinase K (ThermoFisher) for 1 h at 65 °C before electrophoresis. Protein patterns and LPS were analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 14% acrylamide. After electrophoresis, proteins and LPS were stained with Bradford reagent (Bos et al., 2015 (link)) and silver (Tsai and Frasch, 1982 (link)), respectively. Alternatively, proteins were transferred to a 0.45-μm pore-size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare). Membranes were then incubated with primary antisera directed against BrkA, FauA, OmpP, or FtsH (de Jonge et al., 2021 (link)), and subsequently with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG antisera (ThermoFisher). Antibody binding was visualized by using Clarity Western ECL Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting Analysis of AphA-V5 Fusion Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were grown to mid-exponential phase (OD650 ∼0.5) and samples containing an equivalent number of cells were resuspended in Laemmli SDS sample buffer (64 (link)). Samples were resolved by electrophoresis through 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and the proteins were visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining or immunoblotting. The proteins for immunoblotting were transferred to a 0.45-μm-pore-size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). The AphA-V5 fusion protein was immunodetected by mouse monoclonal anti-V5 antibodies (diluted 1:10,000) (Sigma-Aldrich, number V8012). To visualize the protein, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (diluted 1:10,000) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was used. To ensure equal loading, the relative densities of the immunoblotted samples were assessed by Coomassie staining of a duplicate gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Protocol for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were lysed in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, a protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Roche)] and centrifuged for 15 min 20,000×g at 4 °C to obtain the cell lysates. Next, the cell lysate concentration was quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). The total protein sample was prepared using 5× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and heated at 99 °C for 10 min. Proteins were separated on a 10% SDS–polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel and transferred to a 0.45-μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Life Science). The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies in TBS-T [150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), and 0.05% Tween-20] containing 3% BSA, followed by secondary antibody incubation using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (Fab) (Enzo Life Sciences) in 5% skim milk dissolved in TBS-T at 26 °C for 2 h. Proteins were visualized with an ECL western blotting reagent (BioNote) and analyzed on a Fusion Solo-S image analyzer (Vilber). Protein band intensities were quantified and analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblot analysis of OmpT, OmpU, and ToxR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures from a single colony were diluted 1:100 into T medium with or without NRES. Cultures were grown to mid-log phase (OD650 of approximately 0.6), and samples containing an equivalent number of cells were resuspended in Laemmli SDS sample buffer (58 (link)). Samples were resolved by electrophoresis through 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the proteins were visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining or immunoblotting. On the Coomassie gels, the positions of the OmpT and OmpU proteins were determined by comparisons with previous studies of the wild-type strain performed with ompT and ompU mutant strains (59 (link)). The proteins for immunoblotting were transferred to a 0.45 μm-pore-size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare). ToxR was detected using rabbit polyclonal anti-ToxR antiserum (a gift from R. K. Taylor) (diluted 1:1,000). V5 fusion proteins were immunodetected by the use of mouse monoclonal anti-V5 antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich; catalog no. V8012) (diluted 1:10,000). To visualize the proteins, either horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG or HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad Laboratories) (diluted 1:10,000) was used. To ensure equal levels of loading, the relative densities of the immunoblotted samples were assessed by Coomassie staining of a duplicate gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Membrane Protein Separation and Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inner and outer membranes were isolated by membrane fractionation as described above and resuspended in Laemmli SDS sample buffer (5% β-mercaptoethanol, 3% [wt/vol] SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 63 mM Tris-Cl [pH 6.8]) (69 (link)), and boiled for 5 min. Samples were electrophoresed in quadruplicate (10%) SDS-polyacrylamide gels for separation. Proteins from three gels were transferred to a 0.45-μm-pore-size nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) and incubated with either rabbit polyclonal anti-IcsA antibody (Edwin Oaks, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research) diluted 1:10,000, rabbit polyclonal anti-SecA antibody (Donald Oliver, Wesleyan University) diluted 1:10,000, or rabbit polyclonal anti-OmpA antibody (Donald Oliver, Wesleyan University) diluted 1:5,000. Proteins were detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (diluted 1:5,000). Signal was detected by developing the blot with Pierce ECL detection kit (Thermo Fisher). Proteins from the fourth gel were visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining and used to assess equal loading of samples for immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!