The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

63 protocols using depex

1

Immunohistochemical Staining of Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues from patients were embedded in paraffin, and 2-µm sections were prepared for immunohistochemical staining. After paraffin removal, the slides were pretreated in 0.01 M citric acid buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes. After blocking with peroxidase blocking solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA), slides were incubated with primary anti-CA9, anti-vimentin, and anti-pan-keratin antibodies as described for immunofluorescence in 5% BSA (1:100) at 4℃ overnight. After washing in Tris-HCl buffer, the specific immunoreaction was detected using a secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:200; Dako). After washing in Tris-HCl buffer, 3-3-diaminbenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB+; Dako) was used for visualization. Sections were counter stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, mounted with DePeX (Serva), and examined with a microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hematoxylin and Eosin Histology Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H&E histology was performed to analyze tissue morphology. Microscopy slides with tissue sections were washed 6 times for 5 min in PBS to remove OCT. Tissue was then briefly rinsed in MilliQ H2O before staining with hematoxylin (Sigma) for 1.5 min. Slides were then rinsed under running tap water and differentiated in 1% acid alcohol (HCl in 70% EtOH) for 30 sec. Slides were rinsed once more in running tap water and subsequently blued in 0.1% sodium bicarbonate (in MilliQ H2O). Slides were stained with eosin Y (Sigma) for 1 min, rinsed in running tap water, kept in MilliQ for 10 min, and rinsed once more under running tap water. Slides were dehydrated in (30%, 70%, and 96%, and 100%) EtOH, cleared in Xylene, and mounted in Depex (Serva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluoro-Jade B Staining for Neuronal Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate neuronal degeneration, Fluoro-Jade B staining was used [60 (link)]. Briefly, sections mounted in gelatin-coated slides were immersed in 100 % alcohol, followed by 70 % alcohol and distilled water containing permanganate. Slides were then incubated with 0.001 Fluoro-Jade B dye (Chemicon, Temecula, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. After staining, sections were washed with distilled water and mounted with DePeX (Serva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Tracing of Neural Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animals were perfused transcardially with 30 ml of saline, followed by 100 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde (diluted in 0.1 M PB, pH 7.4). Brains were removed from the skull and postfixed overnight at 4°C in the same solution. Subsequently, brains were cryoprotected by embedding in 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PB, at 4°C, for 48 h. In the BDA axonal labeling experiments, brains were freeze-sectioned in the coronal plane at 50 μm, and sections were collected in two parallel series. In the first series, after peroxidase activity blocking by incubation in H2O2 0.66% (w/v) in 0.1 M PB for 15 min, sections were incubated for 2 h in avidin-biotin-peroxidase (1:100; Vectastain Elite, Vector Laboraries, Newark, CA, USA) diluted in 0.1 M PB. After washing, peroxidase was visualized using the glucose oxidase-3-3′diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich Química, Madrid, Spain) nickel sulfate-enhanced method (Shu et al., 1988 (link)). For labeling localization, the same sections were then counterstained using cytochrome C-oxidase (CyO) histochemistry (Wong-Riley et al., 1978 (link)) and finally mounted and coverslipped with DePeX (Serva Electrophoresis GMbH, Heidelberg, Germany). A second series was kept in antifreeze solution at −20°C as a backup.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunohistochemical procedures are described in detail in Protocol S9. Briefly, specimens were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated. Then, antigen retrieval was performed with a microwave step and the corresponding buffer, as listed in Table 2. Afterwards, endogenous peroxidases were inhibited with 3 % H2O2 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) followed by the blocking of non-specific binding sites with 5 % normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA). According to Table 2, primary antibodies were diluted and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, specimens were incubated with secondary antibodies (see Table 2) and ABC-HRP kit (Vectastain Elite, Newark, CA, USA). Visualization was performed by adding 3,3′-diaminobenzidine–tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Sigma Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 7 min. After stopping the reaction in tap water, counterstaining with hematoxylin was performed for less than 10 s. Specimens were then dehydrated, mounted in DePeX (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), and coverslipped. Negative controls were performed for each reaction while omitting the primary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunostaining of Spinal Cord Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For light microscopy, sections were briefly immersed in chromium gelatine [0.5% chromium (III) potassium sulfate dodecahydrate; Sigma-Aldrich] and mounted onto slides. After complete drying (approximately 60 min), slides were sequentially washed in Xylol I and II for 10 min each, covered with DePeX (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and coverslipped. MGL-immunostaining was analysed with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with a Nikon DS-U2 digital camera using NIS-Elements Br software (Nikon Instruments). Digital images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). Images of sections from MGL+/+ and MGL−/− spinal cords incubated within the same well and mounted onto the same slide were merged into a single file. All post hoc image processing was performed simultaneously and identically for MGL+/+ and MGL−/− images, and no part of an image was modified separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Liver Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver samples were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized tissue sections were stained with H&E using standard procedures and images were obtained using a high-resolution Leica DC200 digital camera mounted on an Olympus DMLB microscope. Immunohistochemistry of the macrophage marker F4/80, a kind gift of Dr. Antonio Castrillo, was performed on 4 μm deparaffinized-rehydrated sections with 1:100 antibody dilution. Antigen retrieval was carried out with citrate buffer and endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited with 3% H2O2. Samples were blocked and incubated overnight with the antibody, and signal was amplified with the ABC Kit (Vectastin). Slides were revealed with DAB (Vector), counterstained with Hematoxylin and mounted with DePeX (Serva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Break Detection by TdT-Mediated Biotin Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect DNA breaks, we developed a method based in dUTP incorporation by TdT and posterior detection by immunocytochemistry. Cells were fixed with 2% PFA for 10 min and then permeabilized with permeabilization buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium citrate. After washing with PBS for 5 min, they were incubated overnight at 37°C with a 50-µl reaction mixture containing 15 U of the TdT enzyme (Promega) and 200 µM dUTP-11-biotin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were washed again and then incubated for 20 min with 1% PBS-BSA and 1 h at RT with antibiotin HRP-conjugated antibody (Table S1) diluted in 1% PBS-BSA. Revealing was performed following specifications of the DAB Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories). Nuclei were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red (Sigma-Aldrich), and preparations were mounted with mounting medium (DePeX; Serva). Micrographs were taken with a microscope (E90i; Nikon) with a camera (DS-Fi1) and NES Elements software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Situ Chromogenic Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rehydrated paraffin sections were incubated in a solution of 5-bromo-4-chloro-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP) and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT, KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) salt for 45 min in a moist chamber at 37°C. After thoroughly washing in aqua dest., sections were counterstained with nuclear fast red, dehydrated, and coverslipped with DePex (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Prussian Blue Staining of IONPs in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the internalization of IONPs in U251 cells or hMSC by DI or CMI, the cells were washed twice with PBS (AMRESCO, Ohio, USA) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 30 minutes at room temperature. Again, cells were washed twice with PBS, and then were incubated with a 1:1 mixture of 4% potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 4% hydrochloric acid (Sigma-Aldrich) (Prussian blue staining solution) for 15 minutes at room temperature and washed with distilled water three times. The counterstaining was done for cytoplasm with neutral red 0.5% (Panreac Química S.L.U) for 2 minutes at room temperature. After drying the cells, a cover slip was mounted by using the mounting medium DePeX (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH) and finally, the cells were observed using light microscopy (Leica DMI3000B, Leica Microsystems, Germany). All experiments were carried out in triplicate. A table with the total number of cells considered for all experiments are available in Supplementary Section 2 (Suppl. Table S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!