The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vivoquant 2020

Manufactured by Invicro
Sourced in United States

VivoQuant 2020 is a software platform designed for the analysis and visualization of small animal imaging data. It provides multi-modality image registration, segmentation, and quantification capabilities for various preclinical imaging techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using vivoquant 2020

1

Radiolabeled Tracer Imaging of Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After incubation of the infections (3 days for rabbit myositis, 7 days for rabbit joint infection), the rabbits were anesthetized and injected intravenously with 370 MBq 11C-PABA through the lateral ear vein. PET was acquired 30–60 minutes after tracer injection using the NanoScan PET/CT (Mediso) followed by a CT for attenuation correction and anatomical coregistration. For 18F-FDG and 18F-FDS PET, animals were injected intravenously with 18.5 MBq of the tracer and imaged 45 or 120 minutes after injection, respectively (14 (link), 35 (link)). For rat experiments, on day 4 after infection, the rats were injected intravenously with 30 MBq 11C-PABA and imaged under isoflurane anesthesia on a Siemens Inveon microPET/CT system (Siemens) from 0 to 40 minutes with PET followed by CT. Image analysis was performed by drawing VOIs based on the CT with AMIDE 1.0.4. VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro) was used for data visualization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Bone Infection Dynamics with 11C-Rifampin PET/CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
11C-Rifampin PET/CT were visualized using Mirada XD 3.6 (Mirada Medical) or VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro) for human and mice, respectively. 3D spherical VOIs were manually drawn using CT as a guide and applied to the dynamic PET data (38 (link), 39 (link)). VOIs are shown in fig. S3. PET signal in blood (left ventricle; corrected to plasma using the individual hematocrit values from each patient or using a 50% hematocrit value in mice), infected bone (visualized on magnetic resonance imaging or CT in human subjects or 25% distal femur in mice), and contralateral uninfected region (e.g., contralateral tibia or foot in humans and contralateral 25% of distal femur in mice) as well as other uninfected bones (humerus head, humerus shaft, and cervical and lumbar spine) was measured. PMOD 4.1 (PMOD Technologies) and VivoQuant 2020, for human and mice, respectively, were used to generate TACs. Tissue density [Hounsfield unit (HU) obtained by CT] was used to convert the PET data to per mass of tissue. The implants (identified on the basis of radiodensity >5000 HUs) were excluded from the image analysis in all studies. Heat map overlays were implemented using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multi-Atlas Lung Segmentation for SARS-CoV-2 Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A multi-atlas lung segmentation (MALS) algorithm was used to create the whole lung volumes of interest (VOI) [16 , 17 ]. A reference library was generated from a selection of study images that included SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters in various stages of lung disease. A bounding box for the lung VOI was generated using a combination of rigid and affine transformations followed by a high-dimensional deformable registration technique inside this bounding box to efficiently refine the linear mapping accuracy [18 ]. The propagated labels were merged using a weighted voting-based label fusion technique [19 (link)]. A local search algorithm was also used to improve robustness against registration errors [20 (link)]. Pulmonary lesions were defined using a global Hounsfield units (HU) threshold ≥ 0 [21 (link)]. The data are represented as CT score [(pulmonary lesions volume/whole lung volume) × 100]. The investigators analyzing the CT were blinded to the group assignments.
VivoQuant™ 2020 (Invicro, Boston, MA, USA) was used for visualization and quantification. Scatter and attenuation corrections were applied to the PET data and multiple VOIs were manually drawn per animal using the CT as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PET/CT Image Analysis of Pharmacokinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET/CT images were analyzed using VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro) or PMOD (3.402) for animal and human studies, respectively. In humans, the brain segmentation tool (Hammers N30R83) was used to draw VOIs and OsiriX MD 11.0 DICOM Viewer (Pixmeo SARL) was used to create 3D MIP images. Data for blood were obtained by placing a VOI in the left heart ventricle and then correcting to plasma using individual subject hematocrit values or standard hematocrit47 (link) and red blood cell partition coefficient of pretomanid48 (link) (Table S5). PET data were adjusted for mass using the density of each organ obtained from the CT (Hounsfield units). Data are expressed as %ID/g or standard uptake values (SUV) in animal or human studies, respectively. Heatmap overlays were created using RStudio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Imaging of Myeloid Cell Targeting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPECT/CT was performed at 24, 48 and 72 h post-i.v. injection of 177Lu-Lumi804-αCD11b (100 µg, 7.4 MBq; molar activity: 11.1 GBq/μmol). 177LuCl3 (3.7 MBq) was used for SPECT scanner signal calibration. For PET/CT imaging, mice were injected i.v. with 89Zr-Lumi804-αCD11b (50 µg, 3.7 MBq; molar activity: 11.1 GBq/μmol). For blocking studies, 89Zr-Lumi804-αCD11b was co-injected with 500 μg of αCD11b antibody (unlabelled) to reduce molar activity 10-fold (1.1 GBq/μmol). 89Zr-Lumi804-αCD11b uptake is expressed as SUVmean.
Biodistribution studies of 89Zr-Lumi804-αCD11b and 177Lu-Lumi804-αCD11b were performed immediately after the 72h imaging. Mice were euthanized, major organs were collected, weighed, and the tissue-associated radioactivity was assessed in a gamma counter and expressed as % ID/g. The biodistribution of 89Zr-Lumi804-αCD11b was also compared with that of 89Zr-DFO-αCD11b at 216 h post injection. To determine the biodistribution of 89Zr-DFO-αCD11b, serial PET imaging studies were performed at 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Regions of interest were drawn around the tumour and within the contralateral brain, along with muscle, liver, and heart as a surrogate for blood. The SUVmean values were calculated (VivoQuant 2020, Invicro) and plotted against time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Longitudinal PET Imaging of Lung FDG Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six RHZ- or RHZ+ISRIB-treated mice were sequentially imaged after 0, 2, 4, and 6 months of treatment (32 (link), 33 (link), 51 (link)). Each animal was fasted, intravenously injected with 6.9 ± 0.69 MBq of 18F-FDG, and subjected to a 15-minute PET acquisition and subsequent CT scan (nanoScan PET/CT; Mediso, Arlington, VA). Regions of interest were manually selected using CT as a guide and applied to the PET data set using VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro, Boston, MA). Mean lung 18F-FDG PET activity per mouse was calculated as the average activity normalized by injected dose (% ID/mL). Full details are in Text S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PET Data Visualization and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PET data were visualized using OsiriX MD 11.0 DICOM Viewer (Pixmeo SARL). VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro) was used for animal data. VOIs were manually drawn using CT as a guide and applied to the PET dataset (44 , 46 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET/CT Image Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human images were analyzed using Mirada XD 3.6.8 (Mirada Medical) and PMOD version 3.402 (PMOD Technologies LLC) while the animal images were analyzed using VivoQuant 2020 (Invicro). Three-dimensional volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn using the CT as a reference and the PET data extracted as time-activity curves (TACs), which were used to calculate tissue AUCs and represented as AUCtissue/plasma ratios7 (link),8 (link). PET activity was converted from tissue volume to tissue mass using tissue density from the Hounsfield units (CT). Heatmap overlays were created using AMIRA 5.2.1 (Visage Imaging, Inc.) and AMIDE 1.0.6 (Andreas Loening).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!