The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using evos onstage incubator

1

Intracellular ROS Measurement Using Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) level was measured using an Image-iTTM LIVE Green Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) with a published protocol (Zoico et al., 2019 (link)). Cell sheets cultured in chamber slides were washed with warm HBSS and incubated with 25 μM carboxy-H2DCFDA working solution for 30min at dark. Hoechst 33342 was then added at a final concentration of 1.0 μM to the carboxy-H2DCFDA staining solution. Cells were then washed in HBSS and mounted with the coverslip for observation. Cells were observed in an EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System with EVOS Onstage Incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) photomicroscope. Optical density (OD) assay was performed on 10 randomly chosen areas (20 μm2 draw each) positive for ROS by observing images at 200 × magnification using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Oil Red O Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After washing with phosphate buffer sulphate (PBS) 0.1 M pH 7.4, cell cultures were fixed for ten min with 10% neutral buffered formalin as previously described28 (link),29 (link). Cells were washed with sterile double-distilled water and subsequently stained with a filtered ready to use Oil Red O solution (Bio-Optica, Milano, Italy) for twenty min at room temperature. The cells were then washed with sterile double-distilled water and stained with Mayer's Hematoxylin (Bio-Optica, Milano, Italy) ready-to-use solution for 1 min at room temperature and then washed again with sterile double-distilled water. Slides were treated with Aqueous Mount Quick Medium (Bio-Optica, Milano, Italy). Cells were observed in an EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System with EVOS Onstage Incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) photo microscope, at 200 × and 400 × magnification. The images were analyzed using ImageJ software 1.51n version (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) to count the cells within ten representative fields (200 × magnification, number of cells expressed on mm2) and to calculate the area of fifty randomly chosen cells (200 × magnification; area expressed in μm2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Senescence Detection by SA-β-gal Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Senescent cells were detected by using a Senescence Detection Kit (Abcam, Cambridge) as previously described28 (link). Cells were cultured in a six-well plate directly on a coverslip, and after the end of the specific treatment period, cells were washed once with 2 ml of 1 × PBS and fixed with 1 ml fixative solution for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with 2 ml of 1 × PBS and 1 ml of SA-β-gal staining Solution was added to the plate and incubated for 5 h at 37 °C protected from light. To avoid any effect from the CO2, we put the plate inside a Ziplock resealable bag. Cells were then washed once with 1 ml of 1 × PBS and were counterstained with ready-to-use nuclear fast for forty seconds. Cells were observed in an EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System with EVOS Onstage Incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) photo microscope at 200 × magnification. The images were analyzed using ImageJ software 1.51n (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). SA-β-gal-positive cells were quantified by counting stained and unstained cells on 10 random chosen SA-β-gal-positive fields (200 × magnification) and expressed as the per cent of SA-β-gal positive cells over the total counted35 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scratch Wound Assay for Melanoma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A375P cells were seeded in six-well plates (2 × 105 cells/well) and, upon reaching confluence, the monolayer was scratched with a sterile 200 µL pipette tip. A375DR cells were seeded in six-well plates (4 × 105 cells/well) but their monolayer was scratched with a sterile 10 µL pipette tip when they reached confluence. To remove detached cells, wells were washed with complete medium and afterwards refilled with fresh medium containing 10% FBS. 1 µM ONC was added to this culture and samples were compared with the ONC-free ones. A375P cells were incubated for 17 h (1020 min), while A375DR cells for 54 h (3240 min), and the behavior of both cell subpopulations was monitored with EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System. Cells were kept at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in an EVOS Onstage Incubator (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The A375P cells movement frames were captured every 30 min over the aforementioned 17 h with a 5× magnification, while the A375DR cells frames every 2 h with a 10× magnification over the aforementioned 54 h, to create time-lapse videos. The relative images were quantitatively analyzed with the Image-J computing software and the MRI Wound Healing Tool (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). In the graphics, the mean value relative to each point calculated from four independent experiments is reported ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Migration Tracking Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated on 35-mm µ-Dish culture plates (81156, ibidi, USA Inc., Madison, WI, USA) that were coated with laminin 332 matrix [57 (link)], at a density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2. Images of cells cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 were acquired over a 16-h period, using an EVOS Cell Imaging System equipped with an EVOS onstage incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and capturing a phase-contrast image every 10 min. Image sequences were imported into Fiji software [58 (link)] and the Manual Tracking Plug-in was used to track every cell within each frame. Migration tracks were then analysed using the Chemotaxis and Migration Tool software (ibidi). The migration path of each cell was visually outlined, and the accumulated (total) distance, the euclidean distance (straight linear distance from the initial to the final cell position point) and the average speed of each cell were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measurement of Intracellular pH in Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIA PaCa-2, PANC-1, and hTERT-HPNE cells were treated with the indicated inhibitor or transduced for 4, 6 and 6 days, respectively, after which cells were loaded with pHrodo Red AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Next, cells were washed and incubated for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2 in EBSS without phenol red, to allow for the removal of nonhydrolyzed pHrodo Red AM. Thereafter, EBSS was refreshed and cells were imaged at 37°C and 5% CO2 on the EVOS FL Auto Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with the EVOS Onstage Incubator and a Plan Fluorite 20X/0.45 NA air objective. For pH controls, cells were incubated for 15 min with the Intracellular pH Calibration Buffer Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or calibration buffers (130 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 μM Nigericin, 10 μM Valinomycin, 30 mM MOPS pH 6.5–8.0). Fluorescence intensities were determined using ROI selection of fluorescent cells using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in hiPSC-CMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPSC-cardiomyocytes were seeded as full monolayers (30 K cells per well) onto vitronectin-coated CellCarrier-96 well special optics plates (PerkinElmer) and were treated with 1 μM of the anticancer drugs DOXO, AMR or ACLA 10-12 days after seeding. Images of hPSC-cardiomyocytes were acquired using the high-throughput automated EVOS FL Auto 2 (Thermo Fisher) microscope equipped with a 40x Super-apochromat Olympus objective (NA 0.95) (Thermo Fisher, AMEP4754). Anthracyclines were quantified based on auto-fluorescence using the RFP filter cube (ex531/20nm; em593/40nm, Thermo Fisher, AMEP4652). The cell culture area of the well was scanned by automatically acquiring 55 images per well at indicated timepoints. Cells were maintained during the 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 on the EVOS FL Auto 2 with the EVOS Onstage incubator (Thermo Fisher). For flow cytometry quantification, cardiomyocytes were treated in suspension with the compounds and autofluorescence was quantified (at ex561nm, em586/15) with a MACSQuant VYB flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotech) at the indicated time points. Plots were analyzed with FlowLogic software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Wound Healing Scratch Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conventional wound healing scratch assays were also used to explore cellular migration rates and were undertaken using an EVOS® FL Auto Imaging System (Life Technologies, CA, USA) equipped with an EVOS® Onstage Incubator (Life Technologies, CA, USA). Cells were prepared in a 24-well plate and grown to form a monolayer before inducing a wound by scratching a 200 µl pipette tip through the monolayer. Following induction of the wound, the monolayer was washed, fresh medium added and cells allowed to recover for 10 minutes before placing the plate in an EVOS® Onstage Incubator pre-set to 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 80% humidity. Image captures were programmed to three separate areas of each wound and each location was imaged at 1 hour intervals, for up to 20 hours. Wound healing scratch assay experiments involving treatments were undertaken using conventional image capture methodologies using an inverted microscope over 2 hour time points for an 8 hour period. Images of the scratch wound were taken at the same area over the time course and multiple regions of wound closure were quantified within this area. For both methodologies, the distance between the two wound edges was measured using Image J, in pixels, and the distance change at every time interval was calculated through subtraction of the distance between each wound edge at each time point from the wound edge distance at time zero.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Time-lapse Monitoring of Neuron-like Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C-MSCs were seeded in 96-well plates, after replacement of the growth medium with an induction medium, cells were placed in an EVOS® Onstage Incubator (Life Technologies) at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 and 20% O 2 under an EVOS-FL auto microscope (Life Technologies) for time lapse acquisition to monitor cell morphological changes. Images were taken with the high-sensitivity interline CCD monochrome (grayscale) camera in phase-contrast with a 10x Objective, fluorite, LWD, phase-contrast (Olympus AMEP 4681) every hour up to 6 days. The time lag of the neuron-like phase was determined for each cell in a number of representative fields (6 random fields at 10x, for each of triplicate well for each experiment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!