The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using fei talos f200

1

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallinity of samples was detected using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractometer (Bruker D8 Advance, Karlsruhe, Germany), equipped with a mono Cu Kα (λ = 1.541874 Å). And the version of measurement software was V6.5.0 (32 Bit) (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). Moreover, a UV-vis-NIR spectrometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the samples. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Nexsa, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the chemical compositions and the valence potential of the as-prepared samples. The morphologies of the samples were measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-700F, JEOL, Akishima, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM; FEI Talos F200s, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM; FEI Talos F200s, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The elements were confirmed through energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS; FEI Talos F200s, USA). The existence of free radicals was tested through an electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometer (Bruker A300, Bruker, Munich, Germany)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Carbon Dots-Based Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a SmartLab (Rigaku) laboratory diffractometer with a Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ range of 10–80° at 298 K. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum was observed with a Nicolet NEXUS spectrometer (Madison, WI, USA). The morphology of the CDs-MIPs was visualized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS Merlin, Germany) and Transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Talos F200S, Thermo Scientific, USA). Raman spectroscopy was observed with Thermo Scientific DXR 2Xi (USA). The fluorescent lifetimes and quantum yield were performed on FLS 1000-STM steady/transient fluorescence spectra instrument. X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed with a Thermo Fisher Scientific K-Alpha electron spectrometer. The UV spectrum was collected by UV-2600 spectrometer (Shimadzu instrument, Suzhou, China). Fluorescence determination was carried out on an F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). A pHs-3C digital pH meter (Shanghai Lei Ci Device Works, Shanghai, China) was used for the pH adjustments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liposome Characterization by TEM and Zetasizer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of liposomes was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Talos F200S, Thermo Fisher Science, USA). The size distribution and Zeta potential of the liposomes were determined by Zetasizer (Zetasizer Nano ZS ZEN3600, Malvern, UK). The loading rate and encapsulation rate of TPP‐C4, LND, and TPP‐LND were determined by the high‐performance liquid chromatography (Agilent1260, USA) and UV–vis spectrometer (Lambda 25, PerkinElmer, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Aerogel Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An X-ray diffractometer (XRD), D8 Advance (Bruker, Bremen, Germany), was used for the physical phase analysis of the composite aerogel materials. A Fourier transform infrared absorption spectrometer (FT-IR), Nicolet iS5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), was used to determine the infrared spectra of the aerogel materials. An X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS), ESCALAB 250XI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), was used to analyze the composition of the aerogel materials. A scanning electron microscope model (SEM), Sigma 500 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), was used to observe the morphology and structure of the aerogel materials. A transmission electron microscope model (TEM), FEI Talos F200S (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), was used to analyze the microscopic morphology and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of the aerogel materials. A specific surface area analyzer, V-Sorb 2800P (Gold APP Instruments Co., Beijing, China), was used to determine the specific surface area and pore structure distribution of the aerogel materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Halloysite Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS Merlin), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and energy dispersive analysis of X-rays (EDS) of FEI Talos F200S from Thermo Fisher were used for observing the morphology of the HNT and HNT@PA-2. In addition, the specific surface area (BET), pore size and pore volume of HNT@PA-2 were determined by a pore size analyzer (ASAP 2020 V4.03, Micromeritics, USA). The crystal structure of HNT, HNT@PA-2, HNT@PA-1 and HNT@PA-0.5 was obtained by Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) from Bruker D8 of Germany with a Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ range of 10–80°. Functional group structure information of HNT, HNT@PA-2, HNT@PA-1 and HNT@PA-0.5 was recorded by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet iS50, Thermo Scientific, USA). X-ray photo-electron spectrometer (XPS, K-Alpha) was used for collecting XPS spectrum of HNT and HNT@PA-2 by Thermo Scientific. The absorbance before and after adsorption was obtained by UV-2600 ultraviolet absorption spectrometer of Shimadzu (Suzhou).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of AuNPs and AuNP-immersed Paper

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the AuNPs and AuNP-immersed paper were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM; FEI Verios 460, Thermo Fisher, Hillsboro, CA, USA) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM; FEI Talos F200S, Thermo Fisher, Hillsboro, CA, USA). The UV–VIS absorption spectrum of the synthesized AuNPs were obtained using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (UV-5500PC, Shanghai Yuanxi Instrument Ltd., Shanghai, China). The results of the pesticides within the apple tissues were acquired by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent 1290B, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Physicochemical Characterization of Photosensitive Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size distribution and zeta potential analyses of free Ce6, blank NH2-PEG-PCL nanoparticles (PP), blank G-PEG-PCL nanoparticles (GP), CPP, and CGP were conducted using a Malvern particle size analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS-90, Malvern Panalytical). The morphologies of CPP and CGP were visualized through a transmission electron microscope (FEI Talos F200S, Thermo Fisher). The absorption and emission spectra of free Ce6, CPP, and CGP were determined using an ultraviolet‒visible photometer (Ultrospec 7000, Biochrom) and a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-2710, Hitachi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XRD patterns were gained via a Bruker D8. The SEM images were acquired using a Hitachi S-4800 instrument operating at 5 kV. The TEM photographs were gained from JEOL JEM 1400F (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 120 kV, and high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) photographs were acquired from FEI Talos F200S (Thermo Fisher Scientific, New York, NY, USA). The SSA of samples was determined using a Tristar II 3020 surface area and porosity analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum was obtained by a PuXi TU-1901 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Puxi, Beijing, China), with BaSO4 as the reference. XPS patterns were tested using a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo Fisher Scientific, New York, NY, USA) with a monochromatic Al-Kα line source, where the standard C1s peak centered at 284.8 eV was used as the reference. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) patterns were obtained via a Bruker EMX-nano (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Pt/NiFe-LDH Hybrid Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were conducted to analyze the morphological and crystallographic characteristics using Gremini 300 (ZEISS, Germany). The distribution and abundance of platinum nanoparticles (Pt NPs) on the Pt/NiFe-LDH hybrids were quantified using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using FEI Talos F200s (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern was acquired utilizing a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, USA). The measurements were conducted at 60 kV and 80 mA utilizing copper K-alpha emission and a ceramic X-ray tube. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra between 200 and 800 nm were collected using UV1900 (Shimadzu Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded on a powder sample using ESCALAB 250xi (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) with Al Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Catalyst Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four types of catalysts (Au/CaSO4/γ-Al2O3, CaSO4/γ-Al2O3, Au/γ-Al2O3, and γ-Al2O3) were prepared using methods described in the Supporting Information. These obtained catalysts
were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM; FEI
Talos F200s, ThermoFisher), NH3-TPD (BelCata II, MicrotracBEL),
and O2-TPD. The distributions of major elements were determined
using EDS. XPS (Nexsa, ThermoFisher) was employed to investigate the
chemical properties of the catalyst surfaces. In addition, the Raman
spectrum (Raman, LabRAM HR800, Horiba Jobin Yvon) was used to analyze
the state and properties of the graphite microstructure surface. The
obtained characterization results are presented in the Supporting
Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!