The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Scancoat six

Manufactured by Edwards Lifesciences
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Scancoat Six is a laboratory equipment used for applying thin coatings onto various substrates. It is designed to provide uniform and controlled coating deposition. The core function of the Scancoat Six is to enable the application of thin films or coatings onto samples for various research and development purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using scancoat six

1

Gold Sputtering for SEM Observation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were directly mounted on stubs and then gold-sputtered (Scancoat Six, Edwards). Observation was carried out with a conventional SEM operating at 15kV (Cambridge Stereoscan S260).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Native Mass Spectrometry of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human CAs were buffer-exchanged into 20 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.8) by gel filtration columns (Zeba® spin desalting column, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nanoscale nanoelectrospray ionization emitters with tip inner diameters of ~680 nm were fabricated using a Flaming/Brown-type microcapillary puller (P-97, Sutter Instrument Company, Novato, CA, USA) and coated with a mixture of gold and palladium by a sputter coater (Scancoat six, EDWARDS, Eastbourne, UK) as previously described [48 (link)]. Native mass spectra of 5 µM hCA and sulphonamide inhibitors ranging from 3 µM to 10 µM were acquired on a hybrid linear ion trap-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (LTQ Orbitrap XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a voltage of +0.8 to 1.2 kV applied to the nanospray ionization emitters relative to the capillary entrance to the mass spectrometer. Voltages of 160 V and 5 V were applied to the tube lens and capillary (heated to 100 °C), respectively. The integrated abundances of the bound and unbound protein ion charge states (9+, 10+ and 11+) were used to obtain the dissociation constant from the native mass spectra, as reported previously [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparing Samples for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For visualization in SEM, cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and dehydrated with graded series of ethanol (from 50% to 100%, every 10%), each incubation lasted 5 min. Dry preparations were coated with gold particles using a 300-s program (Edwards, Scancoat six). Cultures were analyzed using an SE1 detector with a 10 kV filament tension (SEM, Evo LS 15; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and 1000× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biofilm Characterization on Diverse Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological properties of the biofilms on the PVC and PS plates were examined with confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and SEM but it was then impossible to conduct similar analysis on the biofilms developed on Al plates. Biofilms for CLSM were first stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated concanavalin A (Sigma, United States) at 1 mg/mL and then visualized under a CLSM (LSM7 DUO 710, Carl Zeiss, United States) at 40× magnification. For each biofilm, 3 replicates were used for taking Z-stack images. The stacked CLSM images were then analyzed for microbial cell density, biovolume, mean thickness, roughness, and coverage using the image quantification tool PHLIP34 (link). For SEM, biofilm samples were dehydrated in serial concentrations of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100%; 15 min each), critical-point dried (CPD-2, Pelco, United States), and sputter coated with gold (Scancoat Six, Edwards, United Kingdom) prior to examination under a SEM (JSM-6700F, JEOL, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of the biofilms on the surface of the wooden shelves was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the FEI ESEM Quanta 200 apparatus (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA) at the Department of Engineering of University of Palermo (Italy). The splinters were dehydrated (82 ) and dried (10 (link)) before being mounted on an aluminum holder. All the samples were sputter coated with a thin layer of gold (83 (link)) under argon atmosphere for 90 s (Scancoat Six; Edwards, Crawley, United Kingdom) in order to avoid electrostatic charging under the electron beam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Analysis of Biofilms on Copper Strips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for SEM analysis were prepared as previously described with slight modification (Kong et al., 2018 (link); Boudjemaa et al., 2019 (link)). Preformed biofilms on a copper strip surface were treated with elasnin (5 μg/ml) or TSBG for 6 h followed by overnight fixation with 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde under 4°C. Thereafter, biofilms were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30, 50, 70 and 90% v/v with distilled water and thrice with 100% ethanol for 10 min each step), followed by air drying. Samples were then gold-coated using a gold coater Scancoat Six (Edwards, Irvine, CA, United States) and observed using SEM (JSM-6390, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of T-Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was performed on T-lymphocytes (1.50 × 105) incubated for 20 min at room temperature on slides precoated with 0.02% poly-l-lysine alone or followed by incubation with anti-CD3 (OKT3 clone; 16-0037-85, eBioscience) and anti-CD28 (LEAF purified anti-human CD28; BLE302923, Biolegend) at 10 μg/ml overnight at 4°C. The cells were then washed in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (PB), fixed overnight at 4°C in PB plus 2% glutaraldehyde, and finally washed in PB. Samples were then dehydrated by passage through a graded series of ethanol solutions, dried by the CO2 critical-point method (CPD75; Quorum Technologies, Sacramento, CA), and coated by sputtering with a 20- to 40-nm gold thin layer using a Scancoat Six (Edwards, Crawley, England). Acquisitions were performed using a GeminiSEM 500 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), except for the cell spreading experiments, for which acquisitions were performed using a Cambridge Stereoscan 260.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of C. watsonii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. watsonii cells were harvested in exponential phase, 2 hours after the beginning of the dark period, onto 0.4 µm polycarbonate membranes, and incubated overnight into a fixative with adjusted osmolarity (3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate pH 7.4, NaCl 1.75%). Membranes were then washed, post-fixed for 1 h with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1M cacodylate buffer with 1.75% NaCl, and then dehydrated with graded increasing concentrations of ethanol (50, 70, 96, 100%) and critical point dried (CPD 7501, Quorum Technologies). Finally, membranes were mounted on stubs, gold-sputtered (Scancoat Six, Edwards) and observed with a conventional SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope, Cambridge Stereoscan S260). Pictures were analysed with ImageJ software [41] (link) in order to determine cell diameters and biovolumes. Due to experimental constraints, cell diameters and biovolumes were determined on four cultures (dFe = 3.3, 13.3, 43.3 and 403.3 nM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Imaging of Brain Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy, brain embryos were dissected in PBS and fixed in 2% PFA/2.5% glutaraldehyde. Fixed samples were treated with 2% osmium and washed several times in ultrapure water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol concentrations and prepared for scanning electron microscopy using the critical point procedure (CPD7501, Polaron). Their surfaces were coated with a 20 nm gold layer using a gold spattering device (Scancoat Six, Edwards). Samples were observed under a Cambridge S260 scanning electron microscope at 15 keV.
For transmission electron microscopy, dorsal E12.5 telencephalons were dissected in PBS then fixed in a 2% PFA/1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 3 h. After rinsing in PBS, the tissue was postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 min on ice, protected from light, with shaking. The tissue blocks were then dehydrated in 50% and 70% ethanol baths for 7 min each then stained in 1% uranyl acetate in methanol. After the final dehydration, the samples were immersed for 40 min in a graded series of ethanol/Epon solutions (2:1, 1:1, 1:2 ratios), then in pure Epon. The samples were mounted in Epon blocks for 48 h at 60°C to ensure polymerization. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut sagittally on an ultra-microtome (Ultracut E; Leica) and analyzed with a transmission electron microscope (Technai 12, Philips).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flax Fibre Bundle Surface Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Jeol JSM 6460 L V scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the surface of the fibre bundles corresponding to the different degrees of retting. After being cut into 5 mm pieces, the flax fibre bundles were glued to a sample holder using a conductive adhesive. They were then metallized with a thin layer of gold using an Edwards Scancoat Six device during 180 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!