The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jmp statistical software package

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Japan

JMP is a statistical software package developed by SAS Institute. It provides tools for data analysis, visualization, and modeling. JMP offers a range of functionalities for handling and exploring data, as well as performing advanced statistical analyses. The software is designed to assist users in making data-driven decisions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

43 protocols using jmp statistical software package

1

Survival Analysis of Surgical Spacer Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MST and OS rates were calculated from the date of diagnosis and surgical spacer placement to the date of the event or last follow-up using Kaplan–Meier methods. Freedom from progression and local control rates were calculated from the date of surgical spacer placement to the date of the event or last follow-up using Kaplan–Meier methods. Differences in the survival rates between the groups were compared using the log-rank test. The unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare the parameters of the dose-volume histograms. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all the analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP statistical software package, version 13 (SAS Institute, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Survival Analysis of Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as the means ± standard deviation. The chi‐square test, Fisher's exact test and the Mann–Whitney U‐test were used as appropriate to evaluate the association between two variables. The Steel‐Dwass multiple comparison test was applied to compare the data of the four groups. The survival correlations are illustrated with Kaplan–Meier curves, and survival analyses were performed using the log‐rank test. We conducted a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to estimate the hazard ratios for positive risk factors for death. A two‐sided p‐value of <0.05 was considered significant. The data analysis was conducted with the JMP statistical software package (version 9.0.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Associations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate to evaluate associations between two variables. Two-sided P-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The data analyses were conducted with the JMP statistical software package (version 12.0.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Brain Metastases in Sarcoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BM‐free survival (BMFS) was defined as the interval from the date of the diagnosis of primary sarcoma to the date of BM, and the post‐BM survival (PBMS) was determined from the date of BM to the date of tumor death or last follow‐up. The duration between initial metastasis and BM was defined from the date of extracranial metastasis to the date of BM. The mean duration was defined as the cut‐off point for the duration between initial metastasis and BM. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier curve for each factor. Differences in survival were assessed by the log‐rank test, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Data analyses were performed using the JMP statistical software package (version 14.0.0; SAS Institute Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating Asthma Diagnosis Using NLP-API

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Performance of NLP-API was assessed for both criterion and construct validity. For criterion validity, we calculated agreement rate, Kappa index, and validation index (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) for concordance in asthma status between NLP-API and manual chart review as gold standard. Using logistic regression models, construct validity was assessed by determining the association of asthma status ascertained by NLP-API with the known risk factors for asthma as NLP-API is expected to be correlated with the known risk factors if NLP algorithm reflects true asthma. The associations were summarized by odds ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were performed using JMP statistical software package (Ver 10; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data, and medians (interquartile range) for data with skewed distributions. The Mann‐Whitney U‐test and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test were used for data analysis. A P‐value <0.05 denoted the presence of a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were carried out using the JMP statistical software package, version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DUSP4 expression impacts proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses in this study were carried out with the JMP statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The effects of re‐expression of DUSP4 on cell proliferation and invasiveness was examined using anova and Student's t‐test. Comparisons of DUSP4 scores in normal epithelium, superficial region, and deep region were evaluated using Fisher's exact probability test. Differences at P ≤ .05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Asthma and Appendicitis Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We summarized characteristics of appendicitis cases and matched controls using descriptive statistics. Association of each characteristic, including history of asthma and asthma status based on current symptoms (i.e., no asthma, inactive asthma, and active asthma), with risk of appendicitis was tested using conditional logistic regression models. Additional multivariable conditional analysis was performed to further assess the association of asthma, controlling for pertinent covariates and confounders having association p-values less than 0.2 from univariate analysis (Greenland criteria).42 Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented for all analysis. All analyses were performed using JMP statistical software package (Ver 10.0.0; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of FACS data such as calculation of absolute cell numbers and comparisons of means/medians of each surface phenotype under different experimental conditions were carried out using FlowJo software (TreeStar). Statistical analyses were performed with the JMP statistical software package (SAS Institute) or with Origin software. Histopathological data were analyzed by ANOVA. Flow cytometry data and ELISA data were evaluated by t-test. The differences between study and control groups were tested by Fisher's Exact test. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Asthma Ascertainment Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We summarized the prevalence of asthma by API and PAC alone. To assess criterion validity of API, we calculated overall agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa index between retrospective API and PAC. To further determine the correlation between API and PAC, we calculated the specific proportionate agreement for positive (2a / (2a+b+c); a (positive for both criteria), b (positive for API only), c (positive for PAC only), d (negative for both criteria)) and the specific proportionate agreement for negative (2d / (2d+b+c)).(29 (link)) To determine the construct validity of each asthma ascertainment method, we assessed the associations of known risk factors for asthma with each asthma criteria by using logistic regression models. The associations were summarized by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All analyses were performed using JMP statistical software package (Ver 9.0.1; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!