The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

52 protocols using elecsys anti sars cov 2 assay

1

Immunological Profiling of COVID-19 Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between May 11, 2020, and July 2, 2020, 109 patients diagnosed with COVID‐19 disease 10 weeks previously (71.2 ± 16.5 days) were enrolled into this study. The 109 patients had rtPCR‐confirmed (n = 92, 84.4%) and/or SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody‐confirmed (Elecsys® Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 assay Roche) (n = 108 tested, n = 107 positive, 99.1%) COVID‐19 disease.34 In parallel, 98 healthy control subjects, who were reportedly asymptomatic for the last 10 weeks and who were SARS‐CoV‐2 negative by certified SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody test (Elecsys® Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 assay Roche) and had a negative rtPCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2 at the time of venipuncture, were enrolled into the study. Similar to the COVID‐19‐infected patients also the HC collective had different co‐morbidities as specified in Table 1. All patients gave their written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK No.: 1302/2020). Venous blood was drawn from all subjects and was either EDTA‐anticoagulated (for flow cytometric analyses and determination of lymphocyte emigration rates from thymus using TREC and bone marrow using KREC technology), heparin‐anticoagulated (for cryopreservation of PBMC), or silicon dioxide coagulated (to obtain serum for determining specific antibodies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All serological tests were performed using both the Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA), an automated two-step immunoassay using SARS-CoV-2 antigen-coated paramagnetic microparticles, and the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Roche Diagnostics GmbH – Mannheim, Germany), an electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay that quantifies total SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin (19 (link)). The Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay specifically measures anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies whereas the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assay measures total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, resulting in ~35-fold higher antibody titers in the Roche assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serological Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1) protein receptor-binding domain (S1-AB) encompassing all immunoglobulin classes (panIg) were determined using chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) on a COBAS 8000 analyzer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as prescribed by the manufacturer. Samples were measured at 10-fold dilution (Roche Cobas Universal Diluent) and re-measured at 400-fold dilution when exceeding the upper detection limit (250 U/mL). Results ≥0.80 U/mL are considered positive. PanIg antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen (N-AB) were similarly determined with ECLIA (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using a cut-off index based on positive and negative calibrators normalized to WHO standards [10 ]. Results presenting a ratio of signal/cut-off ≥1.0 are considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antibody Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum was collected using standard sampling tubes or tubes containing separating gel. Neutralizing antibody IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit (S1) was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay, Roche Diagnostics, NJ, USA). The assay uses a recombinant protein representing the nucleocapsid (N) antigen in a double-antigen sandwich assay format, which favors the detection of high-affinity antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. In addition, Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 detects antibody titers, which have been shown to correlate positively with neutralizing antibodies in neutralization assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative determination of antibody levels (IgG and IgA) in plasma against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral spike S protein RBD were measured using a national validated in-house ELISA-based assay, as described before10 (link). A detailed description of the assay can be found in the Supplementary Information. Detection of total antibodies against the N protein was performed using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Diagnostics) on the COBAS 8000 platform (e801 module) following the manufacturer’s instructions. N protein antibody detection was used as a proxy to determine previous SARS-CoV-2 infections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Investigating COVID-19 Vaccine Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our cohort, based in British Columbia (BC), Canada, has been described previously [20 (link)]. Here, we studied the 69 healthcare workers (HCWs) and 47 older adults (OAs) who remained COVID-19 naive until at least 1 month post-third COVID-19 vaccine dose (Table 1). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections were identified through self-reported polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test results and/or the presence of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Diagnostics). No participants received monoclonal antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 treatment or prevention.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of total anti-spike RBD/S1 Ig was performed in serum by the quantitative electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche, Germany) assay approved by FDA and CE. After internal verification according to ISO 15189, the analysis was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were presented in U/mL and considered positive if ≥0.8 U/mL. SARS-CoV-2 anti-N Ig were detected by the qualitative Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche, Germany) approved by FDA and CE. Values with a cut-off index (COI) ≥ 1.0 were considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Serological Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tests for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 N and RBD/S1 were run on all of the serum samples. The tests were performed as previously described (Haselmann et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, the total anti-N Ig was analyzed using the Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche, Germany), a qualitative electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) that is FDA approved and CE marked. The total anti-RBD/S1 Ig was analyzed using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche, Germany), a quantitative FDA-approved, CE-marked ECLIA. The results were reported as a cut-off index (COI) for anti-N and in U/ml for anti-RBD/S1, with values above 1.0 and 0.8 considered to be positive, respectively. The tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and after internal verification in an accredited laboratory, in accordance with ISO 15189.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: Assays and Conversion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies were measured using two commercial chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) kits. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) measures the total antibodies, while the SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) measures the level of IgG antibodies. All assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Binding antibodies were measured as units per mL (U/mL), and SARS-CoV-2 binding antibody units per mL (BAU/mL) were calculated according to the WHO international standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin using conversion factors (Roche 1.028, Abbott 0.142) (11 (link)–13 (link)). The cut-off value of 0.8 U/mL was applied for the Roche total antibody assay, while 50 AU/mL was provided as a cut-off for the Abbott IgG binding antibody assay. To define cases of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection, we further performed a Roche assay detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NC) antibodies in samples obtained at 6 months after the 3rd dose. If the sample was anti-NC antibody positive, we performed the same analysis using all samples previously collected from the same participant to determine the timing of breakthrough infection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Maternal-Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Transfer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody studies were performed from time of delivery using both the discarded clinical maternal peripheral blood samples and the corresponding discarded clinical neonatal umbilical cord blood samples.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were assayed using a fluorescence-based reporting system which allows for semi-quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies using the clinical testing Pylon 3D platform (ET HealthCare, Palo Alto, CA). This platform utilizes a fluorescence-based reporting system which allows for semi-quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with a specificity of 98.8%. Anti-Nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibodies were also measured with the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) to assess evidence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection. IgG levels were plotted as log2 + 116 (link),39 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!