The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using microflex maldi tof ms system

1

Identification of S. anginosus by MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The S. anginosus sputum isolate from sample 009–1 was identified by MALDI-TOF MS as described previously [32]. In brief, the isolate was cultured on blood agar at 37°C and 5% CO2. Individual colonies were transferred in duplicate onto a stainless-steel MALDI target using a toothpick. Upon drying at room temperature, 1 μl of a matrix solution, composed of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/2.5% trifluoro-acetic acid (HCCA), was added to the first spot. For so-called on-target extraction, the second spot was overlaid with 1 μl of 70% formic acid prior to the addition of 1 μl HCCA matrix. The samples were then analyzed with a Bruker microflex MALDI-TOF MS system using the Biotyper 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strains were identified by VITEK-2 Compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) or Microflex™ MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany).
Broth microdilution method with Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid, unipath, UK) was used for AST according to the CLSI 2018 guidelines [22 ]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for fosfomycin was determined by agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 25 μg/mL glucose-6-phosphate. The susceptibility profiles were analyzed according to the CLSI guidelines, and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints (EUCAST, www.eucast.org) for polymyxin B and tigecycline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Identification via MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One of the above-mentioned bacterial suspensions was pelleted after centrifugation (10,000 × g for 2 min) and the supernatant was discarded. The remaining bacterial cell pellet was dissolved in 50 μL of 70% formic acid thorough vortexing, and 50 μL of pure acetonitrile was added to the solution, vortexed, and centrifuged (10,000 × g for 2 min). One microliter of the supernatant was spotted onto a steel target plate and air-dried, which was immediately overlaid with 1 μL of HCCA matrix solution (Bruker Daltonics) (Chen et al., 2013 (link)). Identifications were performed by the Bruker microflex MALDI-TOF MS system using the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 RTC database (Bruker Daltonics) as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MALDI-TOF MS Analysis of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were diluted to 0.5 mg/mL in DI water. A saturated solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) matrix solution was prepared in a 50% v/v mixture of acetonitrile (99.9%) and trifluoroacetic acid (0.1%). 1 μL of the mixture (i.e. matrix and protein solution) was deposited on a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) plate and analyzed using a Microflex MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker, Billerica, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MALDI-TOF MS Bacterial Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates were grown on Columbia blood agar plates (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) for 18 h at 37 °C. Then, a single colony was picked and plated on a 96-spot steel target (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) and superimposed by α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany), which was used as an analytical matrix. The spectra were analyzed using a microflex MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) applying the flexControl software 3.1 (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). This method has been described in more detail in a previous publication by our group [16 (link)]. For the MALDI-TOF MS experiments, calibration and positive control were performed with the BRUKER bacterial test standard (BTS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic Analysis of Staphylococcus schleiferi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 165 animal isolates were collected between 2002 and 2021 from dogs (n = 134), cats (n = 3), and a horse (n = 1) at the Veterinary Microbiological Diagnostic Centre of Utrecht University and from humans (n = 27) at the University Medical Centre Utrecht and Certe Medical Microbiology Friesland and Noordoostpolder in the Netherlands. An additional set of isolates (n = 33) were selected from public databases (NCBI and the Sequence Read Archive) and included in the genomic analysis. The complete set of genomes (n = 198) represented 149 isolates from dogs, 35 from humans, and 14 from other animals. Isolates from the current study were identified as S. schleiferi using MALDI TOF-MS with a Bruker Microflex MALDI TOF-MS system, Biotyper software, and MBT-BDAL-5627 MSP library 5267 (Bruker, Germany). S. schleiferi isolates with MALDI identification scores of ≥2.0 were included in the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Direct MALDI-TOF MS Bacterial Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial cell pellet of the second aliquot was dissolved in 50 μL of formic acid 70% by vortexing; then, 50 μL of pure acetonitrile was incorporated into the solution, vortexed, and centrifuged (10,000 g for 2 min) for the following direct MALDI-TOF MS identification assay. In brief, 1 μL supernatant was spotted onto a target plate, and 1 μL of an α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix solution (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) was added and air dried at room temperature. Identifications were performed by the Bruker microflex MALDI-TOF MS system using the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 RTC database (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). According to the manufacturer, a score of ≥2.0 indicates reliable identification at the species level, while a score between 1.7 and 1.99 indicates a reliable identification at the genus level, and a score below 1.7 indicates a NRI. Thus, these were the criteria used when comparing the results of the direct MALDI-TOF MS identification assay with those from the conventional culture-dependent identification for the evaluation of direct identification performance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

MALDI-ToF MS Bacterial Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates were characterized using the Bruker microflex MALDI-ToF MS system and Biotyper 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). Samples were analyzed in duplicate using the direct transfer method as follows: bacterial cells from a single colony were transferred onto a stainless steel target, the spot was air dried at ambient temperature, was overlaid with 1 μl matrix HCCA (α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid) diluted in a solution of 50% acetonitrile and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid, and allowed to air dry a second time at ambient temperature. The target plate was subsequently introduced into the microflex MALDI-ToF mass spectrometer for automated measurement of mass spectra and comparison to the reference database (Biotyper v3.0). Identifications scores ≥2.0 were required for confident species identification; scores <2.0 and ≥1.7 were considered confident genus identification; isolates with scores <1.7 were re-analyzed in duplicate, and if they failed to achieve a score ≥1.7 on the second round, they were classified as unidentified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Identification via MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, the positive blood cultures were subjected to Gram staining to determine the presence of gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria. Based on these results, appropriate agar plates, including blood, Maconkey, chocolate, and anaerobic blood agar, were used for further culturing. The plates were grown in an incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 35°C in a 5% CO2 or anaerobic atmosphere until visible colonies appeared. Identification was then performed with the Bruker microflex MALDI-TOF MS system using the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 Realtime classification (RTC) database (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) as described previously (Chen et al., 2013 (link); Tian et al., 2016 (link); Zhou et al., 2017 (link)). In brief, a pure bacterial colony was smeared onto a steel target plate with a wood toothpick, and 70% formic acid solution was added to lyse the bacterial cells. Once the formic acid solution dried, 1 μL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix (Bruker Daltonics) solution was added for subsequent MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics) identification. The calibration and validation of MALDI-TOF MS was carried out once a week with a bacterial test standard (BTS) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bruker Daltonics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gram-negative Wound Pathogen Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-duplicate gram-negative pathogens from wound samples were collected between 2018 and 2020 in Xiangya hospital, a university-affiliated tertiary teaching hospital with a 3000-bed capacity in Changsha, Hunan province, China. All samples were routinely tested in the microbiology laboratory. The strains were identified by MicroflexTM MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). All the strains were stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!