The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Zyla 4.2 scmos camera

Manufactured by Nikon

The Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera is a high-performance scientific camera designed for advanced imaging applications. It features a 4.2-megapixel sensor with a fast readout speed and low noise, making it suitable for a variety of scientific and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using zyla 4.2 scmos camera

1

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Intracellular Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parasites were inoculated onto coverslips containing HFFs. For AID strains, after 3 h cells were treated with either 50 μM IAA or PBS. At 24 h post-treatment, intracellular parasites were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS. For the CDPK1-HA-U1 population, after 3 h cells were treated with either 50 nM rapamycin or DMSO for 2h. At 24 h post-rapamycin pulse, intracellular parasites were fixed and permeabilized as above. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 or Hoescht 33258 (Santa Cruz) and coverslips were mounted in Prolong Diamond (Thermo Fisher). V5 was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody (R960–25, Invitrogen). CDPK1 was detected using a guinea pig-derived polyclonal antibody diluted 1:10,000 (Covance)106 (link). HA was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 (901501, BioLegend). GAP45 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 (Eurogentec)108 (link). Primary antibodies were stained with anti-guinea pig, anti-mouse, or anti-rabbit Alexa-Fluor-labeled secondary antibodies diluted 1:1000 (Invitrogen). Images were acquired with an Eclipse Ti microscope (Nikon) using the NIS elements imaging software and a Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera. ImageJ was used for image analysis and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopic Imaging of Stress-Induced Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of the above strains were diluted to OD600 of 0.05 in 3 mL of M9 medium supplemented with 0.2% casamino acids, 0.2% maltose, and 25 μM IPTG. Cells were grown at 30°C until the OD600 reached 0.2, at which point the cells were spotted onto filter discs placed on LB agar medium supplemented with 100 μM IPTG, with or without 10 mM DTT. After 6 hours growth at 30°C, cells were suspended in liquid LB medium, fixed, and imaged using phase contrast microscopy. Scale bar, 5 μm. Where indicated, cells were fixed in 2.6% formaldehyde with 0.04% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 1 h, followed by storage at 4°C for 24 hours. Prior to imaging, cells were immobilized on 2% agarose pads and covered with #1.5 coverslips.
Imaging was performed on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope equipped with a 100x Plan Apo 1.4 NA phase contrast objective, Andor Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera, and Nikon motorized stage. Acquisition software was NIS Elements 4.30. The purchase of this microscope was funded in part by grant S10 RR027344–01. Microscopy was performed with the support of Microscopy Resources on the North Quad (MicRoN) at Harvard Medical School. The ImageJ plugin MicrobeJ41 was used segment cells and measure cell dimensions. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microscopic Imaging of Stress-Induced Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of the above strains were diluted to OD600 of 0.05 in 3 mL of M9 medium supplemented with 0.2% casamino acids, 0.2% maltose, and 25 μM IPTG. Cells were grown at 30°C until the OD600 reached 0.2, at which point the cells were spotted onto filter discs placed on LB agar medium supplemented with 100 μM IPTG, with or without 10 mM DTT. After 6 hours growth at 30°C, cells were suspended in liquid LB medium, fixed, and imaged using phase contrast microscopy. Scale bar, 5 μm. Where indicated, cells were fixed in 2.6% formaldehyde with 0.04% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 1 h, followed by storage at 4°C for 24 hours. Prior to imaging, cells were immobilized on 2% agarose pads and covered with #1.5 coverslips.
Imaging was performed on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope equipped with a 100x Plan Apo 1.4 NA phase contrast objective, Andor Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera, and Nikon motorized stage. Acquisition software was NIS Elements 4.30. The purchase of this microscope was funded in part by grant S10 RR027344–01. Microscopy was performed with the support of Microscopy Resources on the North Quad (MicRoN) at Harvard Medical School. The ImageJ plugin MicrobeJ41 was used segment cells and measure cell dimensions. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Intracellular Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parasites were inoculated onto coverslips containing HFFs. For AID strains, after 3 h cells were treated with either 50 μM IAA or PBS. At 24 h post-treatment, intracellular parasites were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS. For the CDPK1-HA-U1 population, after 3 h cells were treated with either 50 nM rapamycin or DMSO for 2h. At 24 h post-rapamycin pulse, intracellular parasites were fixed and permeabilized as above. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 or Hoescht 33258 (Santa Cruz) and coverslips were mounted in Prolong Diamond (Thermo Fisher). V5 was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody (R960–25, Invitrogen). CDPK1 was detected using a guinea pig-derived polyclonal antibody diluted 1:10,000 (Covance)106 (link). HA was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 (901501, BioLegend). GAP45 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 (Eurogentec)108 (link). Primary antibodies were stained with anti-guinea pig, anti-mouse, or anti-rabbit Alexa-Fluor-labeled secondary antibodies diluted 1:1000 (Invitrogen). Images were acquired with an Eclipse Ti microscope (Nikon) using the NIS elements imaging software and a Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera. ImageJ was used for image analysis and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!