The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using sodium chloride solution

1

Antibiotic Treatment in Horses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 14 gauge 5.25 inch (13 cm) polyurethane catheter (Mila International, Erlanger, KY, USA) was aseptically inserted in the jugular vein of each horse for antibiotic administration. Blood was drawn from each horse for complete blood count and serum chemistry analysis before treatment and at the end of the treatment period. Horses were administered enrofloxacin (Baytril, Bayer Animal Health, Shawnee, KS, USA; 7.5 mg/kg, IV, q24h [AM] and 30 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, IV, q24h [PM]), ceftiofur sodium (Naxcel; Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ, USA; 2.2 mg/kg, IV, q12h), oxytetracycline (Oxytetracycline Injection 200, Norbrook Inc., Lanexa, KS, USA; 6.6 mg/kg, IV, q24h and 30 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, IV, q24h [PM]) and 0.9% sodium chloride solution (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA; 30 mL, IV, q12h) for 5 days. Physical examinations (heart rate, respiratory rate, mucous membrane appearance, capillary refill time, digital pulses, abdominal auscultation and rectal temperature) and evaluation of fecal output and consistency were performed twice daily. Antimicrobial drugs were administered after fecal samples were obtained. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum of each horse via a sterile rectal sleeve every morning, frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at −80 °C until processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Evaluation of Zwitterionic Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zwitterionic starch (AL-Z) was synthesized following the methodology reported in the previous article [26 (link)]. Polyethylene glycol (PEG, Mw~1000) was purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Polycaprolactone diol (PCL-diol, Mw~2000), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), N, N-Dimethylformamide (anhydrous, 99.8%) (DMF), and potato starch (soluble) (AL-N) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit and Triton® X-100 were obtained from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). A CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit was provided by Promega (Woods Hollow Road, Madison, WI, USA) and a Human Thrombin-Antithrombin Complex ELISA Kit (TAT) by Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), ethanol absolute, calcium chloride anhydrous (CaCl2), and bovine albumin serum (BSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A 0.9% sodium chloride solution was acquired from Baxter (Deerfield, Illinois, USA). Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was obtained from VWR® (Radnor, PA, USA). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), human aortic smooth muscle cells (AoSMC), an EGM BulletKit, and an SmGM-2 BulletKit were purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Infusate Composition and Controls

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The infusate vehicle (saline) control consisted of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution (Baxter Healthcare Corporation; Deerfield, IL) stored at room temperature. Solutions of HBOC-201 (13 g/dL) in saline were prepared by Biopure® (Cambridge, MA). A 13% solution of human serum albumin (HSA) in saline (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.; Kalamazoo, MI) was used as a control for protein content. To control for colloidal composition, a 6% solution of hetastarch in saline (DuPont®; Wilmington, DE) with colloidal properties similar to HBOC-201 was used. An additional control for hemoglobin content was performed using purified bovine hemoglobin (PBH; 13 g/dL) in isotonic saline in Tris/Acetate buffer, pH 7.8 (Biopure®). Aseptic techniques were applied to fill the syringes for infusion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Earthworm Immune Response to Stimulants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult (clitellate) earthworms (0.55–0.75 g body weight) of Eienia andrei (Sav.) were collected from the stockbreeding maintained in the Institute of Zoology of the Jagiellonian University, kept in controlled laboratory conditions (21 ± 1 °C; 12:12 LD) in a commercial soil (PPUH Biovita, Poland). On the experimental day, each earthworm was washed with water, and then injected with 20 µl of stimulant solution into the coelomic cavity (1 cm behind the clitellum). The stimulants were prepared in sodium chloride solution 0.9 % (Baxter Terpol, Poland) and the following compounds were used: phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-PMA (PMA, 0.1 µg/ml), lipopolysaccharide from E. coli 0111:B4 (LPS, 1 mg/ml), zymosan A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Z, 1 mg/ml) or Micrococcus luteus (Ml, 1 mg/ml). All stimulants were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo., USA). LPS was used, rather than live E. coli, as it is the strongest compound/stimulating agent of all Gram bacteria. After injection, earthworms were placed individually in 15 ml vials filled with filter paper that was soaked with water (Homa et al. 2013 (link), modified). Subsequently, coelomocytes were collected 24 or 72 h later for analyses. Control (CTR) animals were injected by sodium chloride solution (0.9 % NaCl). In addition, some control animals were kept in a commercial soil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LPS Exposure in Ferrets: Nebulization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LPS derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Sigma) was solubilized in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (Baxter) to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml. A total of 7 doses (1 mg/ml, 15 ml each) were administered to ferrets via a nebulizer, each dose delivered for 1 h daily for 7 days (Figure 1b). LPS was delivered to conscious ferrets using Allied Schuco® S5000 Nebulizer (Allied) in a tightly sealed chamber supplied with O2, (4 L/min) (Figure 1c). Daily animal monitoring for adverse events included observations of food/water intake, bowel movement, animal activity, and signs of pain.
A total of 15 ml of saline was administered to ferrets via a nebulizer in control groups. Lung function measurements were performed at baseline and day 7 post LPS or saline delivery. BAL samples were collected on day 7 post LPS or saline administration. Baseline PFTs were performed 1 day before the first exposure to LPS.
Ferrets were closely monitored pre‐, intra‐, and post‐nebulization for any signs of erythema/swelling of the sclera and conjunctiva. We also watched for tearing and blepharospasm (blinking/winking). None of these signs were observed in any animal. We used a damp towel to wipe down the pelage of each animal post‐nebulization with the intent to minimize skin exposure. This also mitigated the risk of the animal getting LPS from its coat onto its mucous membranes as well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!