The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axs d8 advance diffractometer

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany, United States

The AXS D8 Advance is a versatile X-ray diffractometer designed for a wide range of applications. It features a modular architecture, allowing for customization to suit specific research and analytical needs. The core function of the AXS D8 Advance is to perform X-ray diffraction analysis, providing detailed information about the structural properties of materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

48 protocols using axs d8 advance diffractometer

1

Characterization of Al-Ga-Cr Metal Nitrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were obtained from commercial suppliers at analytical grade and used as received without further purification. Al(NO3)3 ∙ 9H2O, Ga(NO3)3 ∙ xH2O, Cr(NO3)3 ∙ 9H2O, aqueous HF, melamine, 1,10-phenanthroline, sulfur powder were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., LTD. 1,4-benzene dicarboxylic acid was obtained from TCI Shanghai. Nafion solution was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Power X-ray diffractions (PXRD) patterns of the samples were collected on a D8-Advance Bruker AXS diffractometer with Cu kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation at room temperature. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) measurements were carried on NexION 300 (PerkinElmer). The samples' morphologies were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi, S-4800). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded on Tecnai F20 microscope. The aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM measurements were taken on a JEM-ARM200F instrument at 200 keV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed by using a thermo ESCALAB 250 high-performance electron spectrometer using monochromatized Al Ka (hν = 1486.6 eV) as the excitation source. Al K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was conducted at beamline 02B02 of the SiP·ME2 platform at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural studies were carried out at an XRD D8-Advance Bruker AXS diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). The Debye–Scherrer formula (Equation 1) was used to calculate the average crystallite size of NPs from the XRD peak of the (311) plane [30 (link)]:
where D is the average crystallite size, K = 0.94, λ = 1.54 Å is the X-ray wavelength, β represents the full width at half maximum (FWHM), and θ represents the Bragg's diffraction angle.
The surface morphology and major elemental composition were obtained by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (JEM 2100F) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (TESCAN-VEGA3), respectively. The magnetic behavior was determined by using a physical property measurement system (Quantum Design, USA). The colloidal stability and hydrodynamic size of NPs were studied by using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, 69 UK) and the uniform size distribution by gel electrophoresis (GE BIORAD). Drug attachment and drug release analyses were performed by using UV–vis spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific Evo 220).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Crystal Structure Determination via X-Ray Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tiny single crystals of each new compound were selected and studied at room temperature using X8 4 circles diffractometer equipped with a 2D CCD 4K detector and an Ag micro-source for (1) and ( 3) and an APEX DUO diffractometer equipped with a 2D CCD 4K detector using a Mo-Kα source and an optical fiber acting as collimator for (2). JANA2006 26 program was used to solve the crystal structure using the Charge Flipping algorithm and then to refine it. Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected at room temperature in the range of 2θ = 5 -120°, with 0.02 o step, 5 s counting time and using a D8 Advance Bruker AXS diffractometer in Bragg Brentano geometry equipped with a 1D LynxEye detector. Rietveld refinements were performed using TOPAS 27 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction was performed using a D8 ADVANCE Bruker AXS diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) in θ-θ geometry with a position sensitive LynxEye detector and a variable divergence slit. The samples were investigated with a scan speed of 1 s and an increment of 0.02°per step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Powder X-ray Diffraction of Crushed Single Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The grown single crystals were crushed using an agate mortar and then used for the powder X-ray diffraction analysis performed at room temperature in the 2θ range of 10-60°with a scan step width of 0.02°using a D8 Advance Bruker AXS diffractometer (CuKα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å). Difference of the XRD peak intensities between two patterns implies preferred orientation along [00l] as the XRD pattern was collected using crushed single crystals on a silicon crystal sample holder. A good coincidence between experimental and theoretical powder XRD patterns for the title compound is shown in Fig. 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Analysis of Magnetic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XRD analysis was performed by Bruker D8 Advance AXS Diffractometer, USA using Cu Ka radiation (K = 1.542 A) at speed 1° per min in 2Ɵ range of 7°-80° to study the crystal structure of magnetic nanoparticles of Fe3O4 and hydroxyapatite (HA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Nanocomposite Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical bonding that took place during the synthesis was characterized using a Bruker Tensor 27 Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer employing the KBr pellet method. A MIRA TESCANE scanning electron microscope operating at 15 kV was used for taking field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images. A Bruker D8 Advance AXS diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54 Å) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA in the 2Θ range of 10–80° at a scan rate of 0.05 degrees per second was used to record the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the nanocomposites. The XRD pattern of PGO was characterized using a D500 Siemens diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 0.154 nm) over a 2Θ range of 4–70°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural Analysis of NiFe-LDH@EBP Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NiFe-LDH, EBP, and NiFe LDH@EBP were recorded on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.541874 Å). A field emission transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100F) was used to characterize the morphologies of NiFe-LDH, EBP, and NiFe LDH@EBP. Raman spectra of NiFe-LDH, EBP, and NiFe LDH@EBP were collected on a Lab RAM HR800 Raman spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin Yvon, France). The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of NiFe-LDH, EBP, and NiFe LDH@EBP were obtained using a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi XPS using Al Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating Discarded Chewing Gum Impact on Asphalt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further illuminate the effect of discarded chewing gum (DCG) with its possible existing fillers on the microcrystalline phase of base AP-5 asphalt, X-ray diffraction was carried out using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance Diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH D8 Advance, Karlsruhe, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54005 Å, 40 kV and 40 mA) at ambient temperature (ca. 25 °C). The diffraction (2θ) was monitored from 10° to 90° at a 1°/min scan rate with a 0.05 step size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural Characterization of Titanium Phosphate Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were collected using an AXS D8 Advance
diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation; receiving slit, 0.2 mm;
scintillation counter, 40 mA; 40 kV) from Bruker Inc. The
morphology and structure of samples were analysed by a Hitachi S-4800 field
emission SEM and an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 TEM at an accelerating voltage of
200 kV. Thermal gravimetric analysis was performed on a Pyris Diamond
thermogravimetric/differential thermal analyser (Perkin-Elmer) to analyse the
cabon content in carbon-coated TiP2O7 and
NaTi2(PO4)3. X-ray photoelectron spectra
(XPS) were collected by a Shimadzu/Kratos AXIS Ultra XPS spectrometer. All
binding energies were referenced to the F 1s peak (from polyvinylidene
fluoride) of 688.2 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!