The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using iplex assay

1

Genomic DNA Extraction and SNP Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood samples using a nucleic acid isolation kit (magnetic beads) (DaAn Gene Co., Guangzhou, China). SNP genotyping was performed on the MassArray platform (Agena Bioscience) combined with the iPlex assay (Sequenom, Inc., Hamburg, Germany) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Ten nanograms of genomic DNA of each sample was standardized for genotyping. The DNA samples were amplified by multiplex PCR and treated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase, and then the products were subjected to a specific multiplex single-base extension PCR. The extension products were desalted using clean resin (MassArray clean resin, 28 g) and then transferred onto a SpectroChip array (Sequenom, Inc., Hamburg, Germany), where they were crystalized with a prespotted MALDI matrix. The alleles were distinguished by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Data were processed and analyzed automatically using Typer software (MassArray Typer 4.1.0.83).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping with Sequenom iPLEX Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed at the Children’s Hospital Boston using a custom Sequenom iPLEX assay in conjunction with the Mass ARRAY platform (Sequenom Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). One panel of SNP markers was designed using SEQUENOM ASSAY DESIGN 3.2 software (Sequenom Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mutation Analysis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides prepared from FFPE tissue were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist (E.V.) to ensure adequate tumor content (>50%). Tumors with excessive necrosis were excluded from analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from colorectal liver metastasis tissue using the QIAmp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and was subjected to whole genome amplification using the Repli-G Midi kit (Qiagen). The quality of whole genome-amplified DNA was verified by polymerase chain reactions using 2 control amplicons. The mass array-based iPLEX assay (Sequenom, San Diego, Calif) was used to detect mutations in KRAS (codons 12, 13, 22, 61, 117, and 146), NRAS (codons 12, 13, and 61), BRAF (codon 600), and PIK3CA (codons 345, 420, 542, 545, 546, 1043, and 1047), as previously described.12 (link),13 (link) All mutations were confirmed by repeat iPLEX assay or Sanger sequencing. TP53 mutations were assessed by routine Sanger sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex SNP Genotyping Using MassARRAY

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was designed using MassARRAY® software (version 4.0; Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). The 138 mutations were assigned to six multiplex assays. PCR primers were designed using Mass ARRAY® Assay Design 4.0 Software (Sequenom) (Table II). PCR was first performed using the following protocol: 4 min at 95°C for activation of Faststart taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland, cat. no. 12032937001) and 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 56°C, 1 min at 72°C for 45 cycles, followed by 5 min at 72°C. The PCR products were subjected to shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) reaction for the degradation of residual dNTPs. The SAP reaction was performed as follows: 40 min at 37°C and 5 min at 85°C. Following this, extension reaction was performed by the following protocol: 30 sec at 94°C, 40 cycles for 5 sec at 94°C, from 5 sec at 52°C to 5 sec at 80°C for 5 cycles, and finally 3 min at 72°C. Then, the products were desalted using resin. The final products were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Mass ARRAY® Typer 4.0.5 Software, Sequenom) to identify the mass. SNP genotyping was performed on SEQUENOM®MassARRAY® platform using the iPLEX assay (Sequenom) (37 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genotyping Comparison for Cats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For a subset of cats, concordance was determined by comparing genotyping data from other assay technologies. The BGA and the EVC SNPs were compared to data generated from 43 to 48 cats, respectively, that were previously genotyped using the GoldenGate arrays (illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) 17. A subset of cats were also genotyped for eight BGA and the EVC SNPs using the iPlex assay (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). In addition, some EVC SNPs were evaluated based on the cat's physical appearance and their expected genotypes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HIRA gene genotyping in sheep breeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The g.71874104G>A and g.71833755T>C loci in the HIRA gene were selected for genotyping in 760 samples from Small Tail Han, Tan, Sunite, Suffolk, Dorper, and Prairie Tibetan sheep. Genotyping was performed using PCR and primer extension and mass spectrometric analysis (iPlex assay, Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) on a Sequenom MassArray according to the manufacturer’s instructions (http://www.sequenom.com). Polymerase chain reactions were carried out in 5 µL containing 1.0 µL 20–50 ng/µL genomic DNA, 0.5 µL 10 × PCR buffer, 0.4 µL 25 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1 µL 25 µmol/L dNTP, 1.0 µL PCR Primer mix, 0.2 µL Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and ddH2O. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Primer extension reactions were carried out in 2 µL containing 0.2 µL iplex Buffer, 0.2 µL Terminator mix, 0.94 µL Extend primer mix, 0.04 µL iplex Enzyme, and ddH2O. Extension conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 5 s, annealing at 52 °C for 5 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Only those samples with a >95% success rate and only those SNPs with a genotype success rate of >95% were included in the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping Protocol for Genetic Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA blood or mouthwash samples using the FlexiGene DNA kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and quantified using Quant‐iT Pico Green dsDNA reagent kit (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Of 492 selected SNPs, 447 passed quality control after genotyping (for 45, success rate was below 95%, seven were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and were selected to be genotyped on the customized GoldenGate assay (Illumina, San Diego, CA) 23. The iPLEX assay (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany) for the MassArray system was used to genotype five SNPs that failed genotyping on the Illumina GoldenGate platform 24. Quality of genotyping was high with concordance of duplicates from Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (Paris, France) and control samples above 98%. The two selected non‐SNP polymorphisms in the TYMS gene were genotyped using fragment analysis and single‐strand conformation polymorphism in the laboratory of Dr. Ulrich at the National Center for Tumor Diseases in Heidelberg, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ancestral Admixture Estimation for UL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was carried in two batches. Most of our samples were genotyped at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA) using a Sequenom iPLEX assay (Sequenom, San Francisco, CA) as previously described (19 (link)). The second batch was genotyped at the Affymetrix laboratory (Santa Clara, CA) on an Axiom custom array. We excluded samples with a calling rate <80%. We used blinded duplicates to assess reproducibility, and HapMap samples to assess concordance. An average reproducibility of 96% was obtained, and mean concordance with HapMap samples was 99%. The analytic dataset combining both batches included 2,301 incident UL cases and 3,005 controls.
We genotyped the top 30 ancestral informative markers (AIMs) from a list of 1,536 validated SNPs to estimate percent European ancestry and adjust for population stratification due to European admixture. These 30 AIMs had allele frequency differences between Africans and Europeans ≥75% (20 (link)). We used a Bayesian approach as implemented in the ADMIXMAP software (21 (link), 22 (link)) to estimate individual admixture proportions. In our cohort, the correlation between percent European admixture determined by the reduced panel of 30 AIMs as compared with the full panel of 1,536 AIMs was significant (r=0.87, P=0.0001), confirming the validity of the reduced panel (23 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping p14ARF/MDM2/TP53 Pathway SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected the patients’ paraffin sections after esophagectomy from the Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital. Genomic DNA was extracted with QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kits (56404; Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) from paraffin sections. Haploview software was used to choose the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the p14ARF/MDM2/TP53 pathway. We chose three key genes (p14ARF, MDM2 and TP53) along the p14ARF/MDM2/TP53 pathway by a candidate gene approach [20 (link)]. All of the SNPs had minor allele frequencies of greater than 20% in the Chinese population based on the HapMap HCB data, and all correlated alleles were captured at r2 > 0.8. We only selected SNPs that were located in the 5′ or 3′-UTR gene region, or were found to be associated with the risk of ESCC by our previous reports, for example rs1042522. SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium with selected SNPs or SNPs that cannot be determined in a well were excluded. Six SNPs were finally selected. For all six SNPs, genotypes were determined using the MassArray system (Sequenom iPLEX assay, San Diego, CA). The sample DNA was amplified by a multiplex PCR reaction, and the PCR products were then used for a locus-specific single-base extension reaction. Finally, the resulting products were desalted and transferred to a 384-element SpectroCHIP array. The alleles were discriminated by mass spectrometry (Sequenom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Except for rs1333040, individual samples were genotyped using Sequenom's (San Diego, USA) iPlex assay (primer extension of multiplex products with detection by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) following manufacturer's protocol and detected in a Sequenom MassArray K2 platform. The primer sequences (S1 Table) were designed using Sequenom's MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 software. Genotyping was performed in the Genomics Unit of the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência.
For rs1333040, individuals were genotyped using the TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay-on-demand C_8766795_10 (Life Technologies, USA), with the TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix on a ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System.
Extensive quality control was performed using eight HapMap (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) controls of diverse ethnic affiliation, sample duplication within and across plates, Mendelian inheritance check in one large pedigree (without IA), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group (P>0.001), and a minimum of 90% sample and 85% SNP call rates. Genotype determinations were performed blinded to affection status.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!