The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cell strainer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

A cell strainer is a laboratory tool used to separate cell suspensions. It consists of a fine mesh screen that filters out larger particles, allowing smaller cells to pass through. The core function of a cell strainer is to facilitate the isolation and purification of specific cell types from complex mixtures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

77 protocols using cell strainer

1

Isolation of Thymus, Liver, and Skin Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thymocytes were prepared by complement lyses (LowTox-M Rabbit Complement, Cedarlane Laboratories) with anti-CD8 IgM (RL1.72), anti-CD4 IgM (M31) and 300μg DNAseI (Roche). CD4CD8 thymocytes were separated by density gradient using Lympholyte M (Cedarlane laboratories). For the isolation of liver lymphocytes the organs were perfused to remove residual blood. The whole organs were cut into pieces and digested with 0.5mg/ml Collagenase D and 0.025mg/ml DNAseI. Digest was stopped by adding EDTA to a final concentration of 20mM. Digested organs were meshed through a 40μm Cellstrainer (Fisher Scientific). For isolation of lymphocytes from skin, mice were killed and backs of mice were shaved and subsequently treated with depilatory cream (Veet) to remove residual fur. Skin was cut into small pieces and incubated in RPMI supplemented with 1mg/ml Liberase (Roche) and 0,125mg/ml DNAseI for 60min at 37°C, shaking. During the last 15min, EDTA was added to a final concentration of 60mM. Digested skin was meshed through a 100μM Cellstrainer (Fisher Scientific). Liver and skin lymphocytes were separated by density gradient centrifugation using Percoll-gradients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Encapsulation of Islets with AD-MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Encapsulation of islets coated with AD-MSCs was performed by suspending the cell pellet in a sodium alginate solution (2 wt.%, Sigma Aldrich, USA) containing mannose (1 wt.%, Sigma Aldrich, USA) in 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; 10 mM, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). The solution was transferred to a cell strainer (70 μm, Fischer Scientific, USA) to collect the encapsulated islets. The cell strainer was then inverted in order to spray these encapsulated cells into a CaCl2 (150 mM, Sigma Aldrich, USA) solution which contained a surfactant—pluronic F-127 (0.04 wt.%, Sigma Aldrich, USA) in HEPES (10 mM, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Pressurized ultrapure nitrogen (speed: 2 mm3/s) was then used to spray the encapsulated cells out of the cell strainer. The synthesized alginate capsules were then characterized (see Supplemental Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cell Isolation from Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scissors were used to mechanically dissociate the samples into small pieces, which were placed in a plate supplemented with 2% FBS, collagenase IV (1 mg mL−1, 17104019, Thermo Fisher Scientific), DNase (10 µg mL−1, D5025, Sigma‐Aldrich), Dispase (0.6 mg mL−1, 17105041, Gibco), and CaCl2 (3 × 10−3 m, 21115, Sigma‐Aldrich) in DMEM. The plates were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 60 min. Digestion was terminated by the addition of RPMI containing 10% FBS, filtration of the isolated tissue through a 70 µm cell strainer (08‐771‐1, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and washing with PBS once. The cells were resuspended in 36% Percoll solution (GE Healthcare) and separated using density gradient centrifugation to collect immune cells. The immune cells were blocked using TruStain FcX (anti‐mouse CD16/32 antibody) and then stained for cell surface epitopes on ice. If intracellular epitope staining was required, the cells were fixed and then permeabilized using a fixation/permeabilization solution kit (555028, BD Biosciences), followed by staining of intracellular epitopes. Finally, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using an LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences). These data were analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Pancreatic Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human surgical specimens [10 PNET, eight PDAC, three intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), one metastasis of renal cancer, one gallbladder cancer, one duodenal cancer, six pancreas specimens, and one liver specimen] were obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki Principles and the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center (Tokyo, Japan). To examine the infectivity of each virus, for a flow cytometric analysis, pancreatic tumor tissues were mechanically processed into single cells with a sterile scalpel or scissors, and filtered with 100 μm nylon mesh (Cell Strainer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For the preparation of single cells, fibroblasts were not removed, since major population of cells prior to the analysis was tumor cells, not stromal cells. For immunohistochemical staining, tissues were sliced into small pieces (1–4 mm in diameter) with a sterile scalpel. The prepared cells and tissue slices were cultured in RPMI‐1640 medium with 10% FBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Culture of Murine SCN Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In one series of experiment, eight to 10 newborn (P1–P3) mice were anesthetized on ice and the brains were quickly removed to place in ice-cold Hank’s balanced salt solution (Hank’s solution). The brain was cut coronally at 300 µm thickness with tissue chopper and the SCN region was dissected. Collected SCN tissues were dissociated using papain (13~20 units/ml; Worthington Biochem. Corp.) and DNase I (1 mg/ml) at 37 °C for 20 min. The dissociated cells were washed with 50% horse serum and collected by spin-down at 1,500 rpm for 5 min. The cells were dispersed using pipette in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cell suspension was filtrated with cell strainer (ø 40 µm; Falcon, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The 200 µl of filtrated cell suspension was placed onto the center hole (ø 1.2 mm) of culture dish at a density of 3.5–11.0 × 104 cells/ml (5.8 ± 3.2 × 104 cells/ml). One day before seeding, the dispersed cortical glial cells were pre-cultured in the culture dish. One hour after seeding, the dish was washed with culture medium to remove excessive cells suspended in the dish. Afterward, the culture medium was exchanged twice a week until imaging experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T84 epithelial cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1×106/well) cultured for 48 h and following the experimental treatment, cells were stained with tetramethyl rhodamine-ethyl ester (TMRE: 400 nM, 40 min, 37°C; ThermoFisher) dye for mitochondrial membrane potential. FCCP (10 μM) was used as a positive control for loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. Cells were then washed with PBS, dissociated with accutase (Sigma), and 1 mL PBS (37°C) was added to each well followed by gentle pipetting to increase dissociation. Cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 700 μL phenol red-free culture medium, passed through a 100 µm cell strainer (#22363549; ThermoFisher) and transferred to polystyrene 5 mL flow tubes (Falcon), and stained with DAPI(5 min). prior to assessment. A Becton-Dickson FACS CANTO cytometer supported by the BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was used to measure fluorescence signal intensity from the dyes. The TMRE signal was detected by a PE laser (561-red) and the DAPI signal was detected by a BV421 laser (405-violet). The DAPI signal was used to exclude dead cells and mitochondrial membrane potential was measured as percent of change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of TMRE compared to control cells, where lower MFI indicates increased mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Data were analyzed using Flow-Jo analysis software.36 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Expansion of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H1(WA01), H9 (WA09) and DF19 (iPS DF19-9-7T) were all purchased from the National Stem Cell Bank at www.wicell.org. H1 and H9 were initially expanded in hESCs media composed of 80% DMEM/F12 (cat#11330057, Life Technologies), 20% knockout serum replacer (cat#10828028, Life Technologies), 1% NEAA (cat# 11140050, Life Technologies), 4 ng/ml bFGF (cat# 100-18B, PeproTech), 1 uM L-Glutamine (G8540, Sigma) and 0.07 µM beta-mercaptoethanol (ES-007-E, Millipore) on MEF feeder cells (GSC-6001M, mitomycin inactivated CF-1 cells, GlobalStem), whereas DF19 was expanded in TeSR1 media (5850, Stem Cell Technologies) on matrigel (354234, BD). For culturing on inactivated hMSCs, all cell lines were grown in hESCs media supplemented with different concentrations of bFGF. Cells were long-term passaged using 1 mg/ml collagenase (cat# 17104-019, Life Technologies) and colonies were detached by physical scraping using the tip of a glass pipet after 7 minutes of collagenase incubation. Single cell dissociation was carried out using accutase (cat# A1110501, Life Technologies) by following the provided manufacturer's protocol. Cells were passed through a sterile cell strainer (cat# 08-771-01, Thermofisher Scientific) to achieve single cell homogeneity and counted using the Countess automated cell counter (cat# C10227, Life Technologies), average of 3 chambers/sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Primary Mouse Cortical Neuron Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wildtype mice were mated and at e15 the females were euthanized and the embryos were removed. The females were not further used. The embryos were decapitated and cortex tissue was dissected and used for primary cultures. Culture set-up is previously described in Perland et al. (2016) (link).Briefly, the cortex samples were pooled, washes in PBS-Glucose and dissociated using papain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNAse (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min. Thereafter, mechanical dissociation was performed by pipetting before filtering the cell solution through a cell strainer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cells were diluted in plating media consisting of DMEM:F12 (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMax, 1 mM Na-Pyruvate, 10% FBS and 1% Pen strep, all supplied from Invitrogen, and plated on Poly-L-Lysine (Sigma) coated coverslips (12 mm, #1.5) (Menzel-Gläser, Thermo Fischer Scientific) in 24-well plates (Nonclone delta, Thermo Fischer Scientific) or on Poly-L-Lysine coated 6-well plates (Nunclone delta, Thermo Fischer Scientific). The cell was incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 3 h before media change to NeurobasalA media (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 mM Glutamax, 1 mM Na-Pyruvate, 1 % Pen-strep and 1x B27 Supplement. 75% of the media was changed every third day and the cells allowed to grow for 9 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Culture of Primary Murine Dermal Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary dermal fibroblasts for 3D fibrin gel assays were obtained from 5 to 8 week old C57BL/6 mice (Envigo, UK). This study is compliant with all relevant ethical regulations regarding animal research. All procedures were in accordance with UK Home Office regulation and UK animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 for the care and the use of animals. Mice were sacrificed by a schedule 1 procedure by trained personnel. Mouse hair was removed and skin dissected in Hank’s buffer supplemented with antibiotic and antimycotic solution (Sigma). Fat and excess connective tissues were removed, the dermis was minced with a scalpel and digested in buffer containing 0.25% trypsin without EDTA (Gibco), collagenase IV (4 mg/mL (Worthington) and calcium chloride (0.3 mg/mL, Sigma) for 3 h at 37 °C with agitation during the last hour. After mechanical dissociation, cells were passed through a cell strainer (100 μm, Fischer Scientific). Cells were centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 5 min, resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Sigma), Penicillin (100U/mL), Streptomycin (100 ug/mL) (Gibco) and 1% L-glutamine, and seeded in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks. Medium was changed at 3 h and subsequently changed once a day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Enrichment of Breast Cancer Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse breast cancer 4T1 cells (CRL-2539™, ATCC), EMT6 (CRL-2755™, ATCC), and normal mouse mammary HC11 cells (CRL-3062™, ATCC) were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 (10-040-CV, Corning) with 10% FBS (10082-147, Gibco) and 1% penicillin plus streptomycin supplement (SV30010, Citiva) at 37 °C in a high humidity, 5% CO2 and 95% air incubator. Three-dimensional cancer stem cell (CSC) spheroid culture was performed as previously described [34 (link), 35 (link)]. Briefly, 4T1 cells were cultured using ultralow attachment plates (3471, Corning) in serum free RPMI1640 supplemented with 2% SM1 supplement (5711, StemCell Technologies), 20 ng/mL EGF (78,006, StemCell Technologies), 20 ng/ml FGF (78,003, StemCell Technologies) and 4 µg/ml heparin (7980, StemCell Technologies) for 7 days. Under these conditions, tumor cells with stemness continue to proliferate and grow into spheres, while other cells in the culture are either unable to proliferate or die. At day 7, CSC spheroids, greater than 40 μm, were enriched and collected using a 40 μm cell strainer (50-196-0596, ThermoFisher). CSC spheroids smaller than 40 μm and non-proliferating non-CSCs pass through the strainer and are discarded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!